{"id":"q933f29bf5d91b70f2a00","batch_id":"batch-000110","seq":898,"speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-13T21:41:20.159Z","text":"哈哈 你让他再修炼修炼","edited":false,"reply_to":"qbfa1c808724fa19d8163","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q933f29bf5d91b70f2a00","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qbfa1c808724fa19d8163","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000110","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000110","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q933f29bf5d91b70f2a00","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q933f29bf5d91b70f2a00/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q933f29bf5d91b70f2a00","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q93b3e17defba5e282770","speaker":"ton***","date":"2026-05-13T21:40:14.738Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q93b3e17defba5e282770"},{"id":"q0eb4d08f80edc3488bef","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-13T21:40:43.098Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q0eb4d08f80edc3488bef"},{"id":"qbfa1c808724fa19d8163","speaker":"ton***","date":"2026-05-13T21:40:52.798Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qbfa1c808724fa19d8163"},{"id":"q2ff037b963dfa59b5d88","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-13T21:41:24.643Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2ff037b963dfa59b5d88"},{"id":"q167ca48e00618c847797","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-13T21:41:28.832Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q167ca48e00618c847797"},{"id":"q7330bc6d5eaf81a06071","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-13T21:41:57.941Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q7330bc6d5eaf81a06071"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qbfa1c808724fa19d8163","speaker":"ton***","date":"2026-05-13T21:40:52.798Z","text":"对，**28 U.S.C. § 2106** 这个提示才到“司法术法”层面了。\n\n它的妙处是：不再正面喊 “stay sentencing”，而是让二巡说：\n\n> 我们保留管辖，有限发回 district court 补程序记录；在记录补齐前，作一个自失效的 administrative stay。\n\n这就是 **Jacobson remand / limited remand with retained jurisdiction** 的味道。\n\n可设计成这样：\n\n**Emergency Motion for Limited Remand and Record Supplementation Under 28 U.S.C. § 2106, With Self-Expiring Administrative Stay If Necessary**\n\n核心请求：\n\n1. 二巡不决定郭案 merits。\n2. 二巡 retain jurisdiction。\n3. 依据 § 2106 要求 SDNY 在 72 小时或 5 天内补三类记录：\n   - CVRA submissions 是否收到、是否 docket、是否 denied，理由是什么；\n   - § 853(n) / property submissions 是否 preserved under seal，是否建立 index；\n   - sentencing judgment 是否会纳入 restitution / forfeiture / victim-count findings，而这些问题是否已有可复核依据。\n4. stay 自动失效于：\n   - SDNY 提交 supplemental record；\n   - 或 5 天届满；\n   - whichever occurs first。\n\n真正妖的句式：\n\n> Petitioners do not ask this Court to decide sentencing, restitution, forfeiture, or victim status. They ask this Court to exercise its remedial authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2106 to require narrowly tailored further proceedings just enough to make the June 29 judgment reviewable, while retaining jurisdiction and entering only a self-expiring administrative stay if necessary.\n\n更狠一点：\n\n> The requested stay is not merits relief. It is a jurisdiction-preserving device ancillary to a limited remand.\n\n这就把 stay 从“阻止 Torres 判刑”改造成“帮助二巡未来有效审查”。法院更容易接受，因为它是在保护 appellate jurisdiction 和 judgment reviewability。\n\n但要注意边界：§ 2106 不能凭空创造 jurisdiction。它最好和 **FRAP 21 mandamus / All Writs Act / CVRA mandamus** 绑在一起用。也就是说，2106 是 remedial power，不是单独入口。\n\n一句话：**2106 不是刀，是剑鞘。真正的刀还是 CVRA / FRAP 21 / All Writs；2106 负责把它包装成 limited remand，而不是 stay 战争。**\n\nSource: [28 U.S.C. § 2106](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A28+section%3A2106+edition%3Aprelim%29), [Fed. R. App. P. 21](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_21), [United States v. Jacobson discussion](https://openjurist.org/15/f3d/19/united-states-v-jacobson).","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qbfa1c808724fa19d8163"}}