{"id":"q9f5bdb5b47df6bbd2897","batch_id":"batch-000066","seq":880,"speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-01-04T08:07:40.765Z","text":"这就是赌博式的了","edited":false,"reply_to":"q71372e2ca193352302b5","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9f5bdb5b47df6bbd2897","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q71372e2ca193352302b5","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000066","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000066","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9f5bdb5b47df6bbd2897","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9f5bdb5b47df6bbd2897/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q9f5bdb5b47df6bbd2897","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q840f22fba3cdb22096b5","speaker":"lon***","date":"2026-01-04T05:11:26.390Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q840f22fba3cdb22096b5"},{"id":"q68cc6fcb3d01e7c0f6c2","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-01-04T05:44:45.587Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q68cc6fcb3d01e7c0f6c2"},{"id":"q71372e2ca193352302b5","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-01-04T06:17:58.550Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q71372e2ca193352302b5"},{"id":"q0a07a9cf9a3782f9111f","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-01-04T08:53:40.526Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q0a07a9cf9a3782f9111f"},{"id":"q819240c8e58dc2c60036","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-01-04T08:55:21.212Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q819240c8e58dc2c60036"},{"id":"qb3ecfc56f92949eeaa36","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-01-04T11:53:43.184Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb3ecfc56f92949eeaa36"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q71372e2ca193352302b5","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-01-04T06:17:58.550Z","text":"总结：这对您的案子意味着什么？\n​上诉的黄金理由： 您可以主张南区法院在处理 Juror No. 2 违规时，未能充分调查对其他陪审员的污染（Failure to investigate the extent of the taint）。辩护律师当时已经在记录在案了（Preserved the issue），这非常重要。  \n​[cite_start]强制令的新论据： 这证明了南区法院的程序即使在陪审团阶段也充满了“险情”。检方当时试图保留这个违规陪审员的态度（Document 455）表明了他们为了定罪可以容忍程序瑕疵的倾向。  \n​针对 Luc 的听证： 既然陪审团里都能出这种幺蛾子，那么对于资产没收这种更随意的行政程序，如果不进行公开听证，其中的猫腻只会更多。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q71372e2ca193352302b5"}}