{"id":"qa3f4a4d9d1df5208c6c5","batch_id":"batch-000162","seq":272,"speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-10-05T00:10:29.479Z","text":"张在这里，被luc追，和长岛有点类似，但不完全一样\n张是收款方，一项gclub 一项法治基金\n张选择compel，前者因为gclub本身也在对抗alter ego，还没判；后者因为他觉得是个人律师辛苦钱\n张闷钱的大头，是sec公平基金退款，而这个账户，是不在luc的追款范围内，所以他压根不慌","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"qc59826732f437693b24f","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa3f4a4d9d1df5208c6c5","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc59826732f437693b24f","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000162/pages/2","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000162/pages/2","notice":"这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa3f4a4d9d1df5208c6c5","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa3f4a4d9d1df5208c6c5/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qa3f4a4d9d1df5208c6c5","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qd02c7422a3b90da07f25","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-10-04T22:16:01.976Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd02c7422a3b90da07f25"},{"id":"qca3db854634b11c18431","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-10-04T22:43:12.442Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qca3db854634b11c18431"},{"id":"qd33af319a8bebb8633c7","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-10-04T23:02:05.464Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd33af319a8bebb8633c7"},{"id":"q6898ed19a2b896a13887","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-10-05T00:22:02.033Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q6898ed19a2b896a13887"},{"id":"qb32811c23692a7719f90","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-10-05T01:40:40.184Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb32811c23692a7719f90"},{"id":"q9dfa8327d0fc25b620fd","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-10-05T01:41:32.202Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9dfa8327d0fc25b620fd"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qc59826732f437693b24f","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-10-04T19:32:48.901Z","text":"2026年10月2日｜Adv. P. 24-05276，Despins v. ZYB & Associates, LLC / Yongbing Zhang｜Dkt.37｜“Compel”。CourtListener/RECAP 的最新案卷已经确认 Dkt.37 于10月2日提交，文件类型标记为 Compel。目前该PDF尚未进入免费RECAP，所以公开索引还看不到“要求强制谁提供什么材料、是否涉及证言/文件/付款记录”的完整正文；因此我不会把具体 relief 猜出来。查看 ZYB / Yongbing Zhang Dkt.37 案卷⁠\n\n这宗案本身不是普通外围诉讼。Trustee 的原始起诉状主张，根据 Bankruptcy Code §§549、550，要追回两组破产申请之后的未经授权转账：一笔是通过 G Club 向张永兵支付的 $210,000所谓“sweepstakes prize”；另一组是不少于 $47,314.69、通过 Rule of Law Foundation III 转给 Law Offices of Yongbing Zhang 的款项。Trustee 在诉状中的理论是，这些资金属于 estate property，因此应予撤销并追回；这目前只是 Trustee 的主张，并非我说法院已经认定成立。\n\n所以 Dkt.37 的意义在于：张永兵这条 avoidance/recovery 案并没有沉下去，现在明显进入了需要法院强制某种程序义务的阶段。尤其因为起诉状把 G Club → $210,000 → Zhang 和 Rule of Law → Zhang律所直接写进资金链，这个案件后续如果出现 discovery、银行记录、付款依据、张永兵本人证言或关于款项性质的材料，可能会对你研究的 G Club资金到底是谁的、Trustee凭什么称之为estate property产生证据价值。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc59826732f437693b24f"}}