{"id":"qa804516a84284d2c4daa","batch_id":"batch-000114","seq":589,"speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-31T08:13:22.710Z","text":"[删节：隐私信息]","edited":true,"reply_to":"q3a4c7db7e6dba22cd287","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa804516a84284d2c4daa","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3a4c7db7e6dba22cd287","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000114","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000114","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa804516a84284d2c4daa","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa804516a84284d2c4daa/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qa804516a84284d2c4daa","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qe058088a7cfd67796ced","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-05-31T08:12:57.443Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe058088a7cfd67796ced"},{"id":"qa529b33c2dba20109a0c","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-31T08:13:11.983Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa529b33c2dba20109a0c"},{"id":"q3a4c7db7e6dba22cd287","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-31T08:13:17.160Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3a4c7db7e6dba22cd287"},{"id":"q47a4e4d45a92c7165718","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-05-31T08:15:00.509Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q47a4e4d45a92c7165718"},{"id":"qe0bf0c0758b8d1ae9d1a","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-05-31T08:15:06.530Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0bf0c0758b8d1ae9d1a"},{"id":"qdc3fac316f5e191b6d5b","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-05-31T08:15:34.592Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qdc3fac316f5e191b6d5b"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q3a4c7db7e6dba22cd287","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-05-31T08:13:17.160Z","text":"The SDNY is deliberately risking severe procedural violations to suppress these 18\nfilings because they contain fatal, physical evidence that destroys the legitimacy of\nthe Government’s $1.4 billion forfeiture action. Specifically, Petitioner’s unlawfully\nsuppressed “Emergency Motion for a Mandatory Rule 104 Hearing” (submitted May\n4, 2026) exposes the following coordinated Fraud on the Court:\n\n  1. AUSA Ryan Finkel’s Receipt of Manufactured Perjury: The suppressed ex-\n\n                                          2\n               Case: 26-1296, 05/11/2026, DktEntry: 7.1, Page 3 of 65\n      Case 1:23-cr-00118-AT Document 848 Filed 05/11/26 Page 3 of 65\n\n\n\n\n     hibits provide incontrovertible written proof that an extrajudicial RICO syndi-\n     cate (known as the ”Alliance/Qingteng”) established a perjury-manufacturing\n     assembly line. This syndicate pre-filled ”victim” remission forms and coerced\n     thousands of investors internationally to mail these fabricated claims directly\n     to Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Ryan Finkel. The Government’s re-\n     liance on this fruit of the poisonous tree constitutes systemic prosecutorial\n     misconduct.","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3a4c7db7e6dba22cd287"}}