{"id":"qa9239781a7aca2c7bc20","batch_id":"batch-000120","seq":946,"speaker":"sar***","date":"2026-06-17T22:20:23.217Z","text":"Based on the provided court records, the claimant \"Doe\" who filed the motion in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) district court and the Petitioner \"Doe\" who filed the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals are indeed the same individual.  \nHere is the step-by-step verification from the documents proving their identity matches:\n Identical Claim and Investment Amounts: In both filings, Doe explicitly asserts an interest in a $50,880 Phoenix Farm loan investment.  \n Identical Transaction History: The SDNY motion itemizes four exact wire transfers totaling $50,880:  \n 09/17/2020: $10,000 to Medical Supply Systems INTL LLC  \n 10/13/2020: $10,000 to Maywind Trading LLC  \n 10/14/2020: $10,040 to Maywind Trading LLC  \n 11/17/2020: $20,840 to Maywind Trading LLC  \nThe Second Circuit document incorporates these exact same figures, noting the specific $10,000 wire to Medical Supply Systems and the remaining $40,880 wired to Maywind Trading LLC.  \n The Procedural Connection: The Second Circuit petition (Case 26-364) was filed because the SDNY District Court allegedly refused to formally docket Doe's original pro se third-party petition. Page 1 of the SDNY motion even explicitly lists the reference text: \"Hold Evidentiary Hearing By Doe (Second Circuit Case 26-364)\".  \n Identical Exhibits: Both actions rely on the exact same attached evidence: the public Twitter statement where Xia Qidong (@changdaobrother) states, \"If I disagree, you will not get a penny back...\" alongside Arizona Court Documents 156 and 157.  \nBecause both sets of documents detail the exact same unique personal financial losses, legal arguments, and specific exhibits under the pseudonymous name \"Doe,\" they represent the same person.","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"qab07f15ea06050b1b8bc","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa9239781a7aca2c7bc20","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qab07f15ea06050b1b8bc","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000120/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000120/pages/5","notice":"这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa9239781a7aca2c7bc20","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa9239781a7aca2c7bc20/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qa9239781a7aca2c7bc20","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q7e9de28452ca9cf7489e","speaker":"him***","date":"2026-06-17T21:59:56.153Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q7e9de28452ca9cf7489e"},{"id":"q3124994718cc8aaa5cc4","speaker":"him***","date":"2026-06-17T22:00:24.753Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3124994718cc8aaa5cc4"},{"id":"qab07f15ea06050b1b8bc","speaker":"sar***","date":"2026-06-17T22:15:55.379Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qab07f15ea06050b1b8bc"},{"id":"qf692fd46324000218e88","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-06-17T22:47:28.438Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf692fd46324000218e88"},{"id":"q4c12eaadbb13e0500050","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-06-17T22:55:48.426Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q4c12eaadbb13e0500050"},{"id":"q60ab60fe6ebd66492c09","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-06-17T23:01:28.297Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q60ab60fe6ebd66492c09"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qab07f15ea06050b1b8bc","speaker":"sar***","date":"2026-06-17T22:15:55.379Z","text":"26-1178 的Doe 跟 26-364的Doe 是不是同一个人呀？","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qab07f15ea06050b1b8bc"}}