{"id":"qb7811a0f2d8776dcbb58","batch_id":"batch-000126","seq":196,"speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:44:07.525Z","text":"原审法院在 855 号命令中，面对高达数亿美元、涉及跨国穿透审计错配的巨大事实争议，竟然公然宣称‘不需要举行事实听证会’。这不仅是对《美国联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32 条和 United States v. Fatico 判例的断章取义，更是对第二巡回上诉法院长期以来确立的‘正当程序与完整事实审记录原则’的公然挑衅与践踏。\n如果任由下级法院以此种独断专行（arbitrary and capricious）的方式‘闭眼胡判’，第二巡回上诉法院在司法管辖区内的法律权威将荡然无存。”","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":null,"reply_status":"none","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb7811a0f2d8776dcbb58","reply_url":null,"reply_label":"","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000126","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000126","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb7811a0f2d8776dcbb58","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb7811a0f2d8776dcbb58/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qb7811a0f2d8776dcbb58","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q11749bf98c3654ee8308","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:43:23.519Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q11749bf98c3654ee8308"},{"id":"q2ff5dcb8ead010f80bc3","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:43:33.979Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2ff5dcb8ead010f80bc3"},{"id":"q688d39e45e428ca8f905","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:43:47.397Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q688d39e45e428ca8f905"},{"id":"qf5e6e0826c861324a798","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:44:18.520Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf5e6e0826c861324a798"},{"id":"q15aa564590896cd08bf7","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:44:28.993Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q15aa564590896cd08bf7"},{"id":"q959bc50a1c5fede378a6","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T02:44:49.068Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q959bc50a1c5fede378a6"}],"parent_message":null}