{"id":"qb84b1b69ef0a05f98284","batch_id":"batch-000119","seq":517,"speaker":"him***","date":"2026-06-15T23:50:02.412Z","text":"不一定","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb84b1b69ef0a05f98284","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000119/pages/3","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000119/pages/3","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb84b1b69ef0a05f98284","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb84b1b69ef0a05f98284/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qb84b1b69ef0a05f98284","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q9100356a052da0d28e24","speaker":"ton***","date":"2026-06-15T23:47:50.488Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9100356a052da0d28e24"},{"id":"qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-06-15T23:49:01.770Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0"},{"id":"q156f48efabfd0095554b","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-06-15T23:49:37.353Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q156f48efabfd0095554b"},{"id":"q84b68d6a7ccacb1e8721","speaker":"him***","date":"2026-06-15T23:50:08.454Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q84b68d6a7ccacb1e8721"},{"id":"q24241f9dcb586eba02e1","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-06-15T23:50:27.331Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q24241f9dcb586eba02e1"},{"id":"q5148515aa9fd329016c8","speaker":"him***","date":"2026-06-15T23:50:40.335Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q5148515aa9fd329016c8"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-06-15T23:49:01.770Z","text":"The\nU.S. Supreme Court has strictly mandated that the corporate fiction may\nonly be cast aside upon a showing that the principal maintained\n\"exclusive dominion and control\" over the assets to the exclusion of\nall separate corporate minds (First National City Bank v. BANCEC, 462\nU.S. 611).","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0"}}