{"id":"qba9d285b4c78e41882fd","batch_id":"batch-000138","seq":290,"speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-22T16:45:53.841Z","text":"这些除了程序性错误，其它都很难打吧，属于有争议的，就好像庭审律师一样，中规中矩，结果没用","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"qbeab8447a01323db4c90","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qba9d285b4c78e41882fd","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qbeab8447a01323db4c90","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000138/pages/2","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000138/pages/2","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qba9d285b4c78e41882fd","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qba9d285b4c78e41882fd/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qba9d285b4c78e41882fd","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qf74ecff21ac8dcda727a","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-22T15:52:07.661Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf74ecff21ac8dcda727a"},{"id":"q840f1ab1c66f89e62cc9","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-22T16:36:12.854Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q840f1ab1c66f89e62cc9"},{"id":"q7db966363ee2aee60a5a","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-07-22T16:36:34.543Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q7db966363ee2aee60a5a"},{"id":"q5b53082b81a8e6f1fb91","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-22T16:46:29.760Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q5b53082b81a8e6f1fb91"},{"id":"q0131174ccae4038485cd","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-22T16:47:26.479Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q0131174ccae4038485cd"},{"id":"qb53b95cd3bbc528fedbd","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-22T16:48:08.832Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb53b95cd3bbc528fedbd"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qbeab8447a01323db4c90","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-07-22T15:42:03.323Z","text":"4. Insufficiency of the Evidence (Rule 29 Challenge)\n\nThe Legal Argument: The defense will move under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, asserting that \"no reasonable jury could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt\" based on the record presented at trial.\n\nHow it applies to dismissal: If the Second Circuit agrees that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient, direct evidence linking Guo personally to the theft or diversion of specific investor pools, it can overturn the guilty verdict on those specific counts.\n\n5. Constitutional & Procedural Prejudices\n\nGovernment Misconduct or Brady/Giglio Violations: Claims that the government failed to disclose exculpatory evidence (evidence favoring the defense, such as internal farm communications or records showing local management control).\n\nJury Instruction Errors: Arguing that the judge gave flawed or misleading instructions to the jury regarding the legal definitions of control, agency, or intent.","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qbeab8447a01323db4c90"}}