{"id":"qcb092f3c8dd8f4a5de9c","batch_id":"batch-000018","seq":328,"speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-07-24T07:05:28.683Z","text":"郭和g系列无关 首先是债权人非法 给郭解绑","edited":false,"reply_to":"q9ccd563bcb471cd6d429","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qcb092f3c8dd8f4a5de9c","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9ccd563bcb471cd6d429","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000018","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000018","notice":"清洗后的社区讨论原话，按时间分批归档，固定首次采集版本，不随原作者后续编辑或删除更新，不含附件内容。含不同观点、推测与未经核实的主张，不代表本站结论或法院认定。导读仅供定位，请阅读完整发言及回复上下文，并结合一手文书核验。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qcb092f3c8dd8f4a5de9c","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qcb092f3c8dd8f4a5de9c/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qcb092f3c8dd8f4a5de9c","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q9ccd563bcb471cd6d429","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-07-24T06:53:43.991Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9ccd563bcb471cd6d429"},{"id":"qe11d76075c3cc34cb775","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-07-24T07:04:12.690Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe11d76075c3cc34cb775"},{"id":"q5ace2c76845aea2c1548","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-07-24T07:04:48.677Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q5ace2c76845aea2c1548"},{"id":"qa7b6db2d7a98bf5ee07d","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-07-24T07:06:13.489Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa7b6db2d7a98bf5ee07d"},{"id":"q7eddea5dcc5a2c0f05ae","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-07-24T07:06:30.506Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q7eddea5dcc5a2c0f05ae"},{"id":"q714ac0c6a0e128250564","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-07-24T07:06:40.464Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q714ac0c6a0e128250564"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q9ccd563bcb471cd6d429","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-07-24T06:53:43.991Z","text":"这逻辑有点乱了，因为债权人郭被绑到g系列，因为被绑到g系列所以他被起诉诈骗。但是，债权人登记的时候郭跟g系列是无关的，那些人根本不是郭的债权人，所以当时破产庭把郭绑到g系列本身就是错的，现在的一切都是建立在这个当初破产庭错误的结论上的。所以要推翻债权人，还得去证明当时郭跟g系列无关，就跟gtv一样，所以真正的毒树应该是破产庭强行把g系列投资人认作郭的债权人。 是不是这个逻辑？ ［用户 rui***］","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9ccd563bcb471cd6d429"}}