{"id":"qd2d588dc5a24f15b4601","batch_id":"batch-000077","seq":544,"speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-02-11T07:55:00.700Z","text":"就是这意思啊 禁制令 是命门\n撤销 就是怂 但留了司法痕迹","edited":false,"reply_to":"q000d86611c98ab8b91f7","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd2d588dc5a24f15b4601","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q000d86611c98ab8b91f7","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000077","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000077","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd2d588dc5a24f15b4601","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd2d588dc5a24f15b4601/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qd2d588dc5a24f15b4601","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qd154fc388c86f3d2c82c","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-02-11T07:54:41.678Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd154fc388c86f3d2c82c"},{"id":"q18b3085f8c09b2959920","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-02-11T07:54:48.054Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q18b3085f8c09b2959920"},{"id":"qdfd745cdc5590a192c72","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-02-11T07:54:49.305Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qdfd745cdc5590a192c72"},{"id":"q5a299c9ea83b68248b09","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-02-11T07:55:00.780Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q5a299c9ea83b68248b09"},{"id":"q78a4cd03ffa93fbea1d0","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-02-11T07:55:31.394Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q78a4cd03ffa93fbea1d0"},{"id":"qc8cf80f4b6b38a83f230","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-02-11T07:55:48.533Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc8cf80f4b6b38a83f230"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q000d86611c98ab8b91f7","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-02-11T07:53:18.411Z","text":"那个禁制令法庭文件很有作用，从破产案附属对抗程序Case 22-05032里的文件128,133里的内容来看（这个禁制令是文件134），其内容很可能有：禁止债务人发布关于债权人的诽谤和虚假信息（如果确实有这样的内容，可能违反言论自由，这个禁制令本身可能违宪）。被告在23年1月23日的直播中谈了债权人登记的事情，luc在破产法庭指控其违反禁制令，在文件1418里甚至把英文认证翻译都展示出来，意思就是拱卒的债权是真的，被告这是在诽谤债权人，违反禁制令。然后破产庭法官一直没有批准，在文件2274里，luc撤销指控。如果拱卒的债权是真的，被告就是妥妥地违反禁制令，妨碍司法，曼宁就会批准，luc也不会撤销指控。现在这个文件在网络上被雪藏了，这本身就是问题。如果找到这个文件，再把对应的论证记录南区或者二巡，会完美补充司法欺诈的最重要一环。虽然这不能直接证明拱卒债权的虚假，但至少是间接证明。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q000d86611c98ab8b91f7"}}