{"id":"qe0397c3a6e61085e861b","batch_id":"batch-000040","seq":381,"speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-09-22T05:31:49.180Z","text":"归纳的很清楚，再加上证据就齐活了","edited":false,"reply_to":"q85db5af956a82abed68b","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0397c3a6e61085e861b","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q85db5af956a82abed68b","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000040","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000040","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0397c3a6e61085e861b","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0397c3a6e61085e861b/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qe0397c3a6e61085e861b","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qd6977ff1590ca1e3baa4","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-09-22T05:23:32.245Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd6977ff1590ca1e3baa4"},{"id":"qe639d23b988f69280289","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-09-22T05:24:49.769Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe639d23b988f69280289"},{"id":"qa990d8e8d4d3536bd9b6","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-09-22T05:25:47.664Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa990d8e8d4d3536bd9b6"},{"id":"qa2119017d0e97be1bf84","speaker":"pz0***","date":"2025-09-22T05:33:37.501Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa2119017d0e97be1bf84"},{"id":"q31e59d9d7f3ce6a1830a","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-09-22T05:34:12.303Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q31e59d9d7f3ce6a1830a"},{"id":"qaddb8004fba710078e4a","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-09-22T05:34:39.403Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qaddb8004fba710078e4a"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q85db5af956a82abed68b","speaker":"wen***","date":"2025-09-22T00:24:43.332Z","text":"1. 檢方的矛盾行為\n   •   指控被告「鼓動債權人登記」= 妨礙司法 / 虛假索賠。\n   •   但破產受托人 Luc 代表的 1600 多名債權人大多數正是這些人。\n   •   檢方卻與 Luc 密切合作，從未反對其身份 → 自相矛盾。\n\n2. Brady 違規（隱瞞有利證據）\n   •   被告在公開視頻中明確反對抗議行為，但檢方忽視這一證據。\n   •   Luc 已接受部分 G 系列投資人，檢方卻將類似投資人視為「虛假索賠」。\n   •   對有利於被告的破產法庭文件，檢方選擇性隱瞞。\n\n3. 選擇性取證\n   •   對不利於被告的言論、文件 → 蒐集完整。\n   •   對有利於被告的證據 → 全部視而不見。\n   •   呈現方式存在嚴重偏頗，構成程序不公。\n\n4. 對受害者的忽視\n   •   合法受害者（包括作者本人）未獲應有保護。\n   •   檢方反而默許甚至支持可疑債權人索賠。\n   •   在受害者補償與資金優先分配上，檢方立場不一致。\n\n5. 結論與指控\n   •   檢方的行為可能構成 系統性的 Brady 違規 與 司法欺詐。\n   •   已對案件造成「不可挽回的司法災難」。\n   •   呼籲檢方正視受害者意見，並公開案件核心問題：\n      •   誰是真正受害者？\n      •   誰是共謀或非法債權人？\n      •   檢方是否履行了披露義務？","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q85db5af956a82abed68b"}}