{"id":"qe0ba77e52f857f01efea","batch_id":"batch-000065","seq":910,"speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-12-24T16:13:21.728Z","text":"不光853，CVRA也一样","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"qa8f3371edc4622518584","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0ba77e52f857f01efea","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa8f3371edc4622518584","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000065/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000065/pages/5","notice":"这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0ba77e52f857f01efea","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe0ba77e52f857f01efea/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qe0ba77e52f857f01efea","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qfa6391860d1fdb2a0a8e","speaker":"beg***","date":"2025-12-24T16:00:12.721Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfa6391860d1fdb2a0a8e"},{"id":"qf276da364b219c4737fb","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-12-24T16:05:22.565Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf276da364b219c4737fb"},{"id":"q482998aca8eb4620333b","speaker":"beg***","date":"2025-12-24T16:07:24.879Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q482998aca8eb4620333b"},{"id":"q9c0f97833d13ff443dde","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-12-24T16:13:56.073Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9c0f97833d13ff443dde"},{"id":"qa0a4491d0093adf0ade2","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-12-24T16:14:25.522Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa0a4491d0093adf0ade2"},{"id":"qf7f543417e1f41d9964a","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-12-24T16:14:45.379Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf7f543417e1f41d9964a"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qa8f3371edc4622518584","speaker":"beg***","date":"2025-12-24T15:59:18.518Z","text":"对于被告及否认自己是被告诈骗受害者来说，Torres法官的782法令是临时性的、表面上的胜利： 83天的延期给了被告争取披露有利证据的时间/机会，也在表面上可有可无的回复了二巡要求其快速处理大量第三方853n自诉人申述的说辞。尽管这是一个临时的表面上的胜利，但是在过去3年中，Torres从来没有做任何真正对被告对受害人有利的事，只有这一次她表面上退了一步。这一表面上的胜利并不是Torres良心发现，是因为”受害人”瑞恩上二巡的强制令起的作用。\n\nTorres并没有做她应该履行的职责：那就是无差别的把第三方853n petition入卷。Torres为什么不入卷大量的第三方文件而是选择性地入了一个过了60天期限的诬陷郭的越南人的？这个越南曾，远在越南，聘请了著名纽约律师事务所前南区检察院检察官担任律师，谁出的律师费？\n\n\nTorres不可能把大量的853n自诉人的petition入卷，因为一旦入卷，整个案件就失控了，精心打造的叙事就垮了，过去的所有操控都被会画问号，所有没回答的问题都要回答：到底谁是受害人？ 受害人是怎么产生的？检方luc的126人是怎么回事？ 被告涉案资产是多少？谁控制的？为什么检方美其名曰代表受害人却对luc挥霍其监管的受害人资产不在乎？luc与检方什么关系？\n\n做了853自诉的，还没被入卷的： 1）电邮询问南区为什么不入卷 ；再做个motion to compel docketing 给南区，留下证据给上二巡用 2）上二巡用writ of mandamus 1651 指控南区司法不公/选择性入卷，打压合法权益人","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa8f3371edc4622518584"}}