{"id":"qed99a5929016a2f39e31","batch_id":"batch-000068","seq":869,"speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-01-12T04:17:18.989Z","text":"这是模版拒绝","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q4e44c3b5378e614b8d2e","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qed99a5929016a2f39e31","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q4e44c3b5378e614b8d2e","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000068/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000068/pages/5","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qed99a5929016a2f39e31","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qed99a5929016a2f39e31/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qed99a5929016a2f39e31","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q61a44e7dcfddee072b73","speaker":"sar***","date":"2026-01-12T03:15:46.629Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q61a44e7dcfddee072b73"},{"id":"q1a6a90b7ddc672063262","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-01-12T03:16:54.537Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1a6a90b7ddc672063262"},{"id":"q4e44c3b5378e614b8d2e","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-01-12T04:15:54.873Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q4e44c3b5378e614b8d2e"},{"id":"q988bae901952a3e40c6f","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-01-12T04:18:12.967Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q988bae901952a3e40c6f"},{"id":"qdd128875ba653d435dbd","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-01-12T04:19:54.867Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qdd128875ba653d435dbd"},{"id":"q6780ef18867ad678b057","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-01-12T04:20:42.535Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q6780ef18867ad678b057"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q4e44c3b5378e614b8d2e","speaker":"beg***","date":"2026-01-12T04:15:54.873Z","text":"大家再讨论一下关于二巡拒绝853n的 writ问题：\n\n”A review of the district court docket in United States of America v. Kwok 23-cr-118, indicates\nyou have not filed a motion for relief under the CVRA statute in the district court.”\n\n\n现在正在准备再去二巡的材料。 上面的那段话是二巡拒绝的理由。二巡是不是说我首先要先去南区 声称CVRA， 之后才能做writ？ \n我知道以前讨论过这个问题","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q4e44c3b5378e614b8d2e"}}