{"id":"qfd306baf3b3761b11576","batch_id":"batch-000066","seq":134,"speaker":"zha***","date":"2025-12-26T19:09:18.275Z","text":"直截了当的挑明了康州破产法院和南区刑事法院的目的是拖延时间和抢夺金钱。\n并且违法不召开第三方自诉人听证会。","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q360fc575aef6ca10c3c3","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfd306baf3b3761b11576","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q360fc575aef6ca10c3c3","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000066","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000066","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfd306baf3b3761b11576","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfd306baf3b3761b11576/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/qfd306baf3b3761b11576","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qa7b425222b03895baaed","speaker":"lon***","date":"2025-12-26T17:06:22.445Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa7b425222b03895baaed"},{"id":"q548cf92b97ad3834b3a8","speaker":"kir***","date":"2025-12-26T17:13:07.124Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q548cf92b97ad3834b3a8"},{"id":"q219de028693ce622a768","speaker":"kir***","date":"2025-12-26T17:13:16.835Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q219de028693ce622a768"},{"id":"q67bf01e5b86ae7c1c61d","speaker":"roy***","date":"2025-12-26T19:10:02.870Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q67bf01e5b86ae7c1c61d"},{"id":"q1e4f0414b64323b153d2","speaker":"yyy***","date":"2025-12-26T19:18:57.336Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1e4f0414b64323b153d2"},{"id":"q82a3e44c211479b769a9","speaker":"beg***","date":"2025-12-27T00:03:35.957Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q82a3e44c211479b769a9"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q360fc575aef6ca10c3c3","speaker":"reb***","date":"2025-12-26T13:20:27.177Z","text":"谷歌翻译：\n七、结论\n\n本案呈现出司法失职的完美风暴：\n\n破产法院对政府指定的受托人予以橡皮图章式的认可，同时禁止债务人发言或质疑虚假索赔；\n\n受托人在三年内挥霍了超过6000万美元的投资者资金，却从未确立对被扣押资产的所有权；\n\n检察官在保释程序中系统性地欺骗法庭，隐瞒无罪证据，如今又公然藐视地方法院的权威；\n\n辩护律师未能传唤关键证人，未能质疑检方的欺诈行为，并且尽管公共记录中已记录了违规行为，却仍然保持沉默；\n\n地方法院通过披露第三方自诉人的个人信息进行报复，然后以“隐私保护”为借口拒绝受理他们的诉讼，同时系统性地无视其根据《破产法》第853(n)条规定“尽快”举行听证会的法定职责。\n\n 这并非正义，而是披着法律外衣的精心策划的掠夺。\n\n申请人并非被告的“受害者”。申请人是一位合法的G系列投资者，其资金被一个政府机构非法扣押，该机构从康涅狄格州的破产法院一直延伸到曼哈顿的刑事法院，其共同目标是：拖延时间，同时掠夺资产。\n\n被告的定罪建立在检方的欺诈行为之上。没收资产也基于这一欺诈性定罪。因此，持续的资产转移是披着法律外衣的盗窃。\n\n国会在制定第853(n)条时就预料到了这种情况。该条款设立了一个安全阀：即使被告被定罪，无辜的第三方也必须获得听证机会来证明其所有权。该听证会必须“尽快”举行——而不是八个月后，不是在所有钱都消失之后，也不是永远不举行。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q360fc575aef6ca10c3c3"}}