郭文贵上诉 · 2Cir ECF 26-361_dkt_29

# Case: 26-361 — In re: Tony, Petitioner

> **Court**: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit > **Related Case**: United States v. Kwok, et al., 1:23-cr-00118-AT (SDNY) > **Dkt Entry**: 29.1, Pages 1-15 > **Filed**: 05/23/2026 > **Document Type**: Notice of District Court Record-Preservation Filing / Letter for Record Preservation > **Petitioner**: Tony (pro se)

---

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Case No. 26-361 SDNY No. 1:23-cr-00118(AT) NOTICE OF DISTRICT COURT RECORD-PRESERVATION FILING I, Tony, respectfully submit this notice solely to inform the Court of a recent filing in the district court. On May 23, 2026, I filed: Letter for Record Preservation Concerning Newly Discovered, Material Evidence Bearing on Sentencing and Exhibit A in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in United States v. Ho Wan Kwok, et al., No. 1:23-cr-00118 (AT) The district court filing was submitted for the limited purpose of preserving the record and expressly preserving objections, without seeking substantive relief or requesting any ruling. This notice is provided for informational purposes only. I do not seek any action by this Court in connection with the district court filing. Respectfully submitted, Tony May 23, 2026

Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 1 of 15

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HO WAN KWOK, a/k/a MILES GUO, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT 2nd Circuit Case No: 26-361 Letter for Record Preservation Concerning Newly Discovered, Material Evidence Bearing on Sentencing The Honorable Analisa Torres United States District Judge Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 Dear Judge Torres: I, Tony, respectfully submit this letter to preserve the record and to bring to the Court’s attention newly discovered evidence, identified within a set of files, that may materially affect sentencing determinations, while expressly preserving all objections and without seeking substantive relief at this time. I. Background On April 18, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit docketed my emergency motion to stay sentencing under the original mandamus case number 26-361. Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 2 of 15

---

On April 23, 2026, the District Court issued an order adjourning the sentencing to June 29, 2026, stating that: “Due to the complexity of the outstanding issues raised in the parties’ voluminous sentencing submissions, see ECF Nos. 826, 828, 833 …” On May 1, 2026, the Government filed its opposition to the stay, which was docketed under my case number. On the same day, I submitted my response to the Government’s opposition. On May 15, 2026, the Second Circuit issued an order addressing my petition and those of other pro se petitioners proceeding in tandem, denying the petitions without prejudice to renewal if the district court fails to docket the submissions within a reasonable time. II. Newly Discovered Evidence that Directly Bears on Sentencing Recently discovered materials, uncovered independently while reviewing archived records, provide corroboration of the factual framework previously set forth in both my original mandamus petition and emergency stay motion. These materials are consistent with the Chinese court document described in Exhibit F (pp. 77–88) of my original mandamus, which documented investigative questioning of individuals connected to the financial flows at issue. Taken together, the newly identified evidence independently confirms that investor funds did not move through a direct transfer mechanism, but instead followed a structured, multi-layered intermediary process. Specifically, funds originating from Chinese investors were first deposited into personal accounts, then routed through foreign-trade company accounts for currency conversion, and subsequently transmitted to downstream accounts associated with the broader organizational network described in the record. This routing pattern mirrors the intermediary-mediated flow structure previously described in my filings, in which funds were further redistributed through additional designated accounts under centralized organizational control. Importantly, the newly discovered materials do not merely repeat prior assertions, but independently reinforce the existence of a systematic and recurring transaction architecture consistent with the allegations already before the Court. This corroboration strengthens the reliability of my existing record and Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 3 of 15

---

directly bears on sentencing considerations by further clarifying the manner and structure of the underlying financial flows, including the degree of complexity that affects their traceability. In addition, this evidence is consistent with the District Court’s own characterization of the record as involving “the complexity of the outstanding issues raised in the parties’ voluminous sentencing submissions,” and further contextualizes that complexity by illustrating the layered intermediary structure underlying the disputed transactions. III. Factual Details Reflected in Exhibit A ● Exhibit A consists of an accounting record maintained by the Seven-Star Farm during the operation of the G-Series investment in the year of 2020. Although it represents only a small subset of the overall records, it directly illustrates how the funds underlying the Government’s asserted loss figures were composed and processed, thereby providing important context for evaluating the reliability of those loss calculations. The table appearing on the first page through the first half of the second page of Exhibit A contains the following column headers, listed from left to right: “Number,” “Group Number,” “Discord Name,” “Chinese Yuan Wired,” “USD Equivalent (after conversion),” “Wired Date,” “Group Leader,” “Commission Fees,” “Contract Amount (USD),” “Loan Application Number,” and “Notes.” The table appearing in the lower half of the second page of Exhibit A contains the following column headers, listed from left to right: “Number,” “Group Number,” “Discord Name,” “Token Amount (Units),” “USD Equivalent (after conversion),” “Wired Date,” “Group Leader (Haiping #0330),” “Commission Fees (USD),” “Contract Amount (USD),” “Loan Application Number,” and “Notes.” The third page of Exhibit A contains multiple tables arranged across the page. On the left side, the first table includes the following column headers, listed from left to right: “Number,” “Group Number,” “Name,” four repeated Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 4 of 15

---

columns each labeled “Amount Transferred Out,” and “Subtotal.” Immediately adjacent, a second table on the left side contains the column headers: two columns labeled “Amount Already Transferred Out,” followed by “Subtotal.” To the right of these tables, the page reflects an overall “Total” figure summarizing the amounts presented. On the right side of the page, a separate table includes the following column headers: “Group 4,” four columns each labeled “Amount Transferred Out,” and “Subtotal.” Notably, as reflected in Exhibit A, the first page and the first half of the second page record remittances denominated in RMB and U.S. dollars. In contrast, the latter half of the second page and the third page reflect transactions recorded in USDT. This shift in the form of recorded transactions further indicates a change in how the investment funds were processed and documented during the relevant period. ● Exhibit A further corroborates the remittance structure described in my original mandamus petition (SDNY 817 at page 8). As reflected in the records, investors were organized into small groups, each coordinated by a designated group leader. These investors did not transfer funds directly to downstream entities. Instead, each investor transmitted funds to accounts designated through the group leader and provided confirmation (e.g., screenshots) of the transaction to the group leader. Some intermediaries (黄牛) then verified and reconciled these incoming payments. Notably, investors did not have direct contact with these intermediaries. Following this verification process, funds were routed through additional accounts, including those associated with foreign-trade entities used for currency conversion, before ultimately being transmitted to accounts in the United States as designated within the broader network. This structure reflects a layered, intermediary-mediated process in which fund flows were segmented across multiple roles and stages, rather than Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 5 of 15

---

conducted through direct, traceable investor-to-recipient transfers. At no point in this process did any investors have direct contact with the ultimate recipients of the funds, and they were not provided with identifying information regarding those recipients. As set forth in my original mandamus petition (SDNY 817 at page 8), all funds related to Seven Star Farm investments were remitted to accounts designated by the then Secretary-General of the Alliance, known as “Changdao Brother.” These investors did not have direct contact with the ultimate fund recipients; instead, payments were coordinated through designated group leaders, who transmitted funds to the specified accounts. Subsequently, as reflected in Exhibit A (at page 4), all investment activities of Seven Star Farm were abruptly terminated on a specific date, at which point the farm was taken over by an Alliance working group. Following this intervention, all ongoing investment arrangements were canceled. Importantly, the financial accounts and records associated with these transactions were ultimately consolidated and transferred to Rushui (also known as Hao Yumei), who assumed control over the relevant funds and accounting. Rushui (Hao Yumei) maintained control over the financial accounts of all farms. All G-series investment records and transaction details fell within her management and control. For record-preservation purposes, I further note that Exhibit A represents only a small subset of the broader Seven-Star Farm transaction records, yet it alone reflects more than approximately two million dollars in investment-related transfers. Seven-Star Farm was only one of more than ten Himalaya Alliance farms involved in G-Series-related activity, and other farms reportedly handled even larger sums. This raises a series of unresolved questions that bear directly on sentencing reliability: how many Chinese investors in fact transmitted funds into the G-Series structure; how many similar farm- level accounting records, remittance tables, or group-ledger materials exist; and how many such investors were later arrested, prosecuted, or sentenced in China in connection with the same underlying investment activity, thereby creating further cross-sovereign conflict concerning the legal characterization of those funds. Based on the structure reflected in Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 6 of 15

---

the present record, it appears that key transaction details, investor identities, and farm-level accounting materials were maintained or controlled by Hao Yumei (also known as Rushui), the former Alliance Secretary-General Xia Qidong, the court identified as the co-conspirator in SDNY Dkt. 382, 388, also known as “Changdao Brother,” and the current Secretary-General, a Government registered victim, known as “Qingteng.” I do not ask the Court to resolve those broader factual questions on this submission alone. I preserve the narrower but important point that the currently visible record may reflect only a fraction of the underlying investor population, transaction data, and cross-sovereign complications, and that sentencing should not proceed on the assumption that the existing victim-and-loss picture is complete. IV. Serious Procedural Impact on Sentencing The newly identified materials reflected in Exhibit A raise serious procedural concerns bearing directly on the reliability of any sentencing determination, particularly with respect to victim composition, loss calculations, and the factual integrity of the record on which sentencing is expected to proceed.

1. Exhibit A corroborates that the Government’s visible victim presentation reflects only a limited subset of the affected investor population, and that the nonappearance of Chinese investors does not mean they do not exist. The structure reflected in Exhibit A is consistent with the concern raised by Chunk Chyi in Second Circuit No. 26-77, Dkt. 18: namely, that the victim population visible in the criminal proceedings appears to represent only a partial subset of the broader investor body. As reflected in various recent § 853(n)- related mandamus proceedings and district-court filings, including SDNY Dkts. 838, 844, and 845, increasing numbers of Chinese investors have surfaced only through third-party and appellate processes rather than through the Government’s own presentation of victim interests. Exhibit A independently reinforces that point. It demonstrates that the absence of Chinese investors from Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 7 of 15

---

the visible trial record does not mean they were nonexistent, uninvolved, or unaffected. Rather, the record suggests that a substantial portion of the investor population—particularly mainland Chinese investors—was simply not meaningfully reflected in the Government’s courtroom presentation. To the extent the sentencing framework relies on an assumed victim picture that does not adequately account for this broader population, that framework may be materially incomplete. 2. Exhibit A reveals severe fund-mixing and intermediary-layering problems that directly undermine the reliability of loss calculations. Exhibit A does not reflect a simple one-investor-to-one-recipient transfer model. Instead, it reflects a segmented and intermediary-mediated architecture involving group leaders, verification by intermediaries, foreign-trade company accounts, currency conversion, and subsequent routing through further designated accounts. This structure raises serious questions regarding whether the Government’s asserted loss model has been adequately tested against the actual underlying fund flows. In particular, it raises the possibility of mismatch between nominal transferors and true beneficial investors, fragmentation of what may be a single economic loss across multiple visible names or transactions, and the risk that the same underlying funds may be represented or counted in more than one way. In a sentencing context, these features are highly significant. A loss model that relies on simplified inflow figures without adequately accounting for the intermediary structure reflected in Exhibit A may be materially distorted. 3. The newly identified materials also reinforce the cross-sovereign contamination problem previously preserved in my original mandamus petition. As described in my original mandamus petition, the Guo-related investment cases in China were treated as matters subject to “centralized handling.” That Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 8 of 15

---

context strongly suggests that the arrest, prosecution, coercion, and punishment of investors connected to the same investment flows were not isolated or exceptional occurrences, but part of a broader and recurring pattern. Indeed, as previously preserved, some investors connected to the same transactions have reportedly been arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced in China; it has even been reported that at least some such individuals suffered catastrophic consequences while in detention. Whether or not each such report can be individually resolved in this proceeding, the narrower point is clear: a substantial portion of the funds at issue may have originated from persons whose participation in the same investments was already criminalized by Chinese authorities before those funds were fully translated into the Government’s American victim-and-loss framework. In that sense, the source population itself was legally and politically burdened before the funds even reached the United States. That reality further destabilizes any simplified sentencing assumption that the relevant funds can be cleanly mapped onto a uniform, uncomplicated victim class.

4. When Exhibit A is read together with my prior record-preservation submission in Second Circuit No. 26-361, Dkt. 22, and the Government’s own filing in SDNY Dkt. 716-4, it raises a serious question whether the Government knowingly proceeded on a materially simplified financial narrative.

As preserved in my response to the Government in Second Circuit No. 26-361, Dkt. 22, at page 3, the Government’s own filing in SDNY Dkt. 716-4 indicates that federal investigators had already examined aspects of the Chinese-investor structure as early as 2022. Yet at trial, the Government’s presentation, including the testimony of FBI Special Agent Kimberly Espinoza (SDNY Dkt. 425 at p. 129) and expert Paul Hinton (SDNY Dkt. 441), appears to have rested on a Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 9 of 15

---

significantly simplified “money-in/money-out” fraud model. Exhibit A now provides concrete documentary support that the relevant fund flows were materially more layered, intermediary-driven, and identity-distorting than such a simplified model would suggest. If the Government possessed substantially greater knowledge of the actual upstream Chinese-investor structure, yet presented only a flattened endpoint version of those transactions, that raises a serious record-integrity concern. At minimum, it suggests that the Court should not proceed to sentencing without first determining whether the current victim and loss framework rests on a sufficiently complete and reliable account of the underlying financial flows. In sum, Exhibit A materially strengthens the concerns already preserved in my prior filings. It suggests that the current sentencing record may rest on a victim framework that reflects only a partial subset of the true investor population, and on a loss model that has not been adequately tested against the actual intermediary structure of the underlying transactions. Under these circumstances, careful scrutiny of the reliability of the sentencing record is warranted. V. Preservation of Objections to Proceeding to Sentencing Without Resolution of the Above Issues In SDNY Dkt. 837, this Court adjourned sentencing to June 29, 2026, expressly stating that the adjournment was warranted “[d]ue to the complexity of the outstanding issues raised in the parties’ voluminous sentencing submissions.” In addition, the Second Circuit, in its May 15, 2026 order, denied certain mandamus relief without prejudice to renewal if the district court fails to docket the Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 10 of 15

---

submissions within a reasonable time. The present submission is made in part to assist the Court in its ongoing handling of these issues and, if necessary, to clarify the basis for any renewed mandamus relief sought before June 29, 2026. In light of the Court’s own acknowledgment of unresolved complexity, and in light of the Second Circuit’s express recognition that continued non-docketing may warrant renewal, I respectfully preserve my objection to any sentencing proceeding that moves forward before the above-described issues are meaningfully addressed. More specifically, I preserve my objection to proceeding to sentencing on a record that remains materially burdened by unresolved disputes concerning victim composition, loss calculations, intermediary fund- routing, cross-sovereign investor status, and the reliability of submissions or frameworks derived from potentially compromised sources. To the extent those issues remain unresolved, sentencing on the present record would risk reliance on a materially incomplete or unreliable factual foundation. Respectfully submitted. Tony May 20, 2026. Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 11 of 15

---

Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 12 of 15 序号 团号 DISCORD名字 汇款人民币折成美元(美汇款日期团长 手续费 合同金额(美)借款申购编{说明 1 13 久久#2468 140105 20015 11.27今晚打老虎 15 20000US1200 2 13 滔滔江水#1942 120099 17157 11.27今晚打老虎 15 17142US1201 3 13 末路狂奔#6936 70105 10015 11. 27 今晚打老虎 15 10000 US1202 4 13 与魔共舞#2818 70105 10015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 10000 US1203 5 13 二蛋蛋#2071 70105 10015 11. 27 今晚打老虎 15 10000US1204 6 13 文云#5816 70105 10015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 10000US1205 7 13 GTD#1318 99505 14215 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 14200US1206 小计 640129 91447 8 14 青烟鸟鸟#2153 70105 10015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 10000 US1207 9 14 文天#6589 77105 11015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 11000 US1208 10 14 喜马人#1271 28105 4015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 4000 US1209 11 14 叶孤吹雪#8847 28015 4002. 15 11.27今晚打老虎 15 3987. 15US1210 12 14 |windlady#9254 70105 10015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 10000US1211 13 14 互粉sding#5097 70105 10015 11. 27今晚打老虎 15 10000 US1212 小计 343540 49077. 15 14 5 世纪之光#1526 193200 27600 11. 25今晚打老虎 15 150040 US1213 15 5 kuk-Li#6117 95200 13600 11. 25今晚打老虎 15 50055 US1214 16 5 粤战粤勇#5276 235200 33600 11. 25今晚打老虎 15 50070 US1215 17 5 今晚打老虎#8594 39200 5600 11.25今晚打老虎 15 20070 US1216 小计 562800 80400 5 世纪之光#1526 86547. 75 12500 11. 23 今晚打老虎 15 5 kuk-Li#6117 114547. 85 16500 11. 23今晚打老虎 15 5 粤战粤勇#5276 114547. 75 16500 11.23今晚打老虎 15 5 今晚打老虎#8594 100547. 75 14500 11. 23今晚打老虎 15 小计 416191. 1 60000 18 7 0kay巨海#5350 72100 10300 11. 25 Okay巨海 15 10285 US1217 19 7 tie铁铁#8905 70700 10100 11. 25Okay巨海 15 10085US1218 20 7 WHAO#1743 70700 10100 11.25 Okay巨海 15 10085US1219 21 7 云水禅心#7328 71400 10200 11. 25 Okay巨海 15 10185 US1220 22 7 光明行#2657 70630 10090 11. 25 Okay巨海 15 10075 US1221 23 7 煎饼小虾#4332 71400 10200 11. 25 Okay巨海 15 10185US1222 24 7 飞鸽传书#0309 71400 10200 11. 25 Okay巨海 15 24170 US1223 小计 498330 71190 25 8 汇林#8781 77000 11000 11. 25六道 15 10985 US1224 26 8 自由的Justice#144 140000 20000 11. 25 六道 15 19985US1225 27 8 老费#3886 140000 20000 11. 25 六道 15 19985 US1226 28 8 小龙#0693 350000 50000 11. 25六道 15 49985US1227 29 8 Devin (德伟) #064 70000 10000 11. 25 六道 15 9985US1228 30 8 六道#7789 70000 10000 11. 25 六道 15 9985 US1229 31 6 gavin#8479 70000 10000 11. 25黎明的曙光88 15 9985 US1230 32 6 truth#4700 84000 12000 11. 25黎明的曙光88 15 11985 US1231 33 6 壹贰叁肆伍(文壹) 70000 10000 11. 25黎明的曙光88 15 9985 US1232 34 6 幸运星#3225 140000 20000 11. 25 黎明的曙光88 15 19985 US1233 35 6 黎明的曙光88#2655 140000 20000 11.25 黎明的曙光88 15 19985US1234 36 6 文也#9048 532000 76000 11.25 黎明的曙光88 15 90970 US1235 37 6六六#6874 42000 6000 11. 25黎明的曙光88 15 5985 US1236 38 4 红袄绿裤#7917 280000. 18 40000 11. 23红袄绿裤 15 39985US1237 39 4 大树#0375 210002. 16 30000 11. 23红袄绿裤 15 29985US1238 40 4 感恩的心(文煜)#210000. 18 30000 11. 23红袄绿裤 15 29985 US1239 41 4 军队国家政治民主#280000. 28 40000 11. 23红袄绿裤 15 39985 US1240 42 4 痛并快乐着#0090 140000. 18 20000 11. 23 红袄绿裤 15 19985 US1241 43 4 210000. 38 30000 11.23红袄绿裤 15 29985 US1242 44 4 god7believe#5290210000. 68 30000 11. 23红袄绿裤 15 39970 US1243 45 1 文政#8088 147000 21000 11.23一粒麦子 15 20985US1244 46 1 TT蚂蚁#9395 133000 19000 11. 23一粒麦子 15 18985US1245 47 1 一粒麦子#3623 112000 16000 11.23一粒麦子 15 15985US1246 48 1 飞鸽传书#0309 98000 14000 11.23一粒麦子 15 49 1 骑着蜗牛等天明#24 70000 10000 11. 23一粒麦子 15 9985US1247 50 1Amanda 11#2469 70000 10000 11.23一粒麦子 15 9985US1248 51 1 鸡翻身#7615 70000 10000 11. 23一粒麦子 15 9985 US1249 小计 700000 100000 52 10 Keven#5482 70000 10000 11.28 文也 15 9985 US1250 53 10 櫻桃#8926 70000 10000 11. 28|文也 15 9985 US1251 54 10子弹飞飞飞#8305 70000 10000 11. 28文也 15 9985US1252 55 10 橘子#3879 70105 10015 11. 28文也 15 10000 US1253 56 10 sailbirds#6447 70000 10000 11. 28 文也 15 9985US1254 57 10 文也#9048 105000 15000 11.28文也 15 58 10 为你而来#9230 84000 12000 11.28 文也 15 11985US1255 59 10草莓战营#5996 70000 10000 11. 28文也 15 9985US1256 小计 609105 87015 60 11 挺郭大黄峰#7925 70000 10000 11.27 海萍#0330 15 9985US1257 61 11 一田#9396 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985US1258 62 11 逐梦自由人#1900 140000 20000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 19985US1259 63 11 九九贵一#6565 70000 10000 11.27 海萍#0330 15 9985US1260 64 11 xz98#6647 77105 11015 11.27 海萍#0330 15 11000US1261 65 11 |dksnova#4234 70000 10000 11. 27 海萍#0330 15 9985 US1262 66 11文雁#8863 210000 30000 11.27 海萍#0330 15 29985 US1263 67 11|海萍#0330 140000 20000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 39970US1264 小计 847105 121015 68 12 大根#8529 70000 10000 11. 27 海萍#0330 15 9985 US1265 69 12 見贤思齐#1545 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985US1266 70 12 水蜜桃#1110 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985 US1267 小计 847000 121000 小计 1078000 154000 小计 1540004. 0220000 ddm#3969 Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 12 of 15

---

71 12aliang49 Case: 26 361. 05/23/2026 DitEntry: 29151, Page 132 Of 15 72 12 星空#5104 210000 30000 11.27 海萍#0330 15 985 US1269 73 12 love333(斌斌)#28 105000 15000 11.27 海萍#0330 15 14985 US1270 74 12 文峰#7402 105105 15015 11. 27 海萍#0330 15 15000 US1271 75加急团 所罗门#6973 70000 10000 11.27 海萍#0330 15 9985 US1272 76 加急团 薄荷#6571 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985 US1273 77 加急团 快要亮了#0038 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985US1274 78 加急团 盐和光#8398 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985 US1275 79 加急团 小郭#9466 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985 US1276 80 加急团 七哥八弟#8798 70000 10000 11. 27海萍#0330 15 9985 US1277 不知道 82 kuk-Li#6117 139718 20000 11. 18 单独汇 15 83 god7believe#5290 69854 10000 11. 18 单独汇 15 84 世纪之光#1526 340000 5000011. 20号 单独汇 15 世纪之光#1526 403666 60000 11. 23 单独汇 15 85 萝卜头#5467 103076 14647 11. 15 单独汇 15 14632 US1278 86 渡舟(文毅) #2577 345500 50000 11. 25 单独汇 15 149970 US1279 渡舟(文毅) #2577 701610 100000 11. 27 单独汇 15 87 丽莎贝拉111#0735 40467 5820 11. 18 单独汇 15 31297 US1280 丽莎贝拉111#0735 33940 4850 11. 20号 单独汇 15 丽莎贝拉111#0735 140718. 6 20672 11. 24 单独汇 15 88 艾木三#4032 : 18400 11. 25单独汇 15 38370US1281 89 魔王终结者#8647 68186 9970 11. 17 单独汇 15 9955 US1282 小计 2386735. 6 364359 单独汇 不知道 90 9 none#5346 70500 10071 11. 25 none#5346 15 10056 US1283 91 9 Jonathan乔纳森#20 119350 17959 11. 25 |none#5346 15 17944 US1284 92 Felix/H#9605 73850 10550 11. 25|none#5346 15 10535 US1285 93 9 可可里#1132 70350 10050 11. 25 none#5346 15 10035 US1286 94 9 郭先生家的snow#26 140350 20050 11. 25none#5346 15 20035US1287 小计 474400 68680 95 2 美好的初夏#0491 137754 20050 截止11.2美好的初夏#04 50 20000 US1288 团长说每人 汇2次,每 人手续费50 96 2 跟随战神#9300 207754 30050 截止11.2美好的初夏#04 50 30000 US1289 每人汇2 次,每人手 续费50 97 2 长岛开心#1862 104052 15050 截止11.2美好的初夏#04 50 15000US1290 每人汇2 次,每人手 续费50 98 2 去看GTV#6875 69051. 88 10050 截止11.2美好的初夏#04 50 10000 US1291 每人汇2 次,每人手 续费50 99 2 文晓#8884 69052 10050 截止11.2美好的初夏#04 50 10000 US1292 每人汇2 次,每人手 续费50 100 2 Casey#0086 69052 10050 截止11.2美好的初夏#04 50 10000 US1293 木琴没汇手 续费(暂按 15元扣) 101 2 木琴#8369 33701. 88 5000|截止11.2美好的初夏#04 25 4975US1294 暂按25扣 小计 690417. 76 100300 102 3 中共是毒瘤#4143 140000 20000 11. 23 文武小生(杜 15 19985US1295 103 3 New宝石#2362 140000 20000 11. 23 文武小生(杜 15 19985 US1296 104 3 喜典#8219 175000 25000 11. 23 文武小生(杜) 15 24985 US1297 105 3 文武小生(杜艾倫) 140000 20000 11. 23 文武小生(杜 15 19985 US1298 106 3 海萍#0330 140000 20000 11. 23 文武小生(杜) 15 107 3 艾木三#4032 140000 20000 11. 23 文武小生(杜) 15 108 3 雅典娜三号#2439 210000 30000 11. 23文武小生(杜 15 29985US1299 小计 1085000 155000 总计 13852862. 2005498. 15 1945 2003553. 15 序号 团号 DISCORD名字 币数(个)折成美元(汇款日期团长(海萍#033手续费(美元) 合同金额(美)借款申购编 说明 1 1 2020灭共必胜#6444 9482. 2052 12.3 2 1 meck#2537 3094. 7751 12.3 3 1 方小鱼#8515 9667 12.3 1 枫叶#5723 5435. 5723 12.3 5 1 树儿贝贝#2082 6671 12.3 1 自由飞翔1994#4636 5494 12.3 小计 39844. 552 7 2 TBK大山大海#2157 10015 12. 4 8 2 二爷#5220 5115. 1755 12. 4 9 2 指日可待#1854 5816. 8333 12. 4 10 2 撸自身#6920 9664 12. 4 11 2 日月都笑#0438 5297. 4396 12. 4 12 2 涤生#2775 12. 4 小计 35917. 448 13 3 勇往直前#7066 1199. 5641 12. 4 14 3 喜马拉雅曙光#8650 10870.008 12. 4 15 3 百年幸福#8367 5396. 4011 12. 4 16 3 +0是条鱼#0564 8547 12. 4 17 3 沉默的羔羊(文汐) 5428 12. 4 18 00 老费#3886 10389. 388 12.4 19 3 薄荷#6571 6484. 2843 12. 4 之前参加了人民币借款US 小计 48314. 646 20 4 夏午#4837 5425. 7826 12.4 21 4 爱人民#0403 3572. 2288 12. 4 22 4 蓝色旗帜#1576 9579. 5207 12.4 23 4 跟随战神#9300 13738. 529 12.4 24 4 蓝色街灯#1395 6598. 6171 12.4 25 4 给不屑的惩罚#6398 6040. 4636 12. 4 小计 44955. 142 26 5 Delilah小胖#3295 9699 12. 4 27 5 uu5000#1668 2988 12.4 28 5 一花一世界#4785 5121 12. 4 29 5 天行2020#1448 6985 12. 4 30 GinaLX文陆#997030万人民币 12. 4 小计(不含GinaLX 24793 总计(不含GinaLX 193824. 79 60000小计 420000 81 加急团 Ally. S 11. 27 海萍#0330 小计 714105 102015 +1000 6 Ally. S Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 13 of 15

---

Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 14 of 15 团号 序号团号名字 汇出数 汇出数量 汇出数量 汇出数小计 4团 汇出数量 汇出数 汇出数量 汇出数 小计 1 5 Delilah小胖 9671 16 12 9699 1 4 夏午 5393. 78260 19 13 5425. 2 5 UU5000 1520 1453 15 2988 2 4 我是谁 0 3 5 一花一世界 5097 11 13 5121 3 4 爱人民 3547. 22889 11 14 3572. 4 5 天行2020 6968 9 8 6985 4 4 蓝色旗中 9551. 52079 15 13 9579. 5 5 Momo(文翡) 0 5 4 跟随战 13722. 5294 16 13738 6 5 GinaLX文陆 30万人民币 30万人民币 6 4 蓝色街火 6582. 61716 16 6598. 7 4 给不屑自6023. 46362 17 6040. 合计 24793 合计 44955 1 3 勇往直前 1188. 5 11.0 1199. 564 1 2 TBK大山 10005 10 10015 2 3 喜马拉雅曙 10841. 16.0 13 10870. 0 2 2 君山老人 0 3 3 百年幸福 5356. 4 11.0 17 12 5396. 4 3 2 二爷 5095. 17552 10 10 5115. 4 3 加0是条鱼 8530.0 17.0 8547.0 4 2 指日可待5780.83336 12 11 13 5816. 5 3 沉默的羔羊 5411 17.0 5428.0 5 2 撸自身 9631 17 16 9664 6 3 老费 10366. 23.0 10389. 4 6 2 日月都今 5274. 43962 11 12 5297. 7 3 薄荷 6441.2 17.0 14 12 6484. 284 7 2 涤生 9 9 合计 48314. 646 合计 35917 已汇出 小计 http protonmail. com/spam 1 2020灭共 9472.2 10 9482. 20520 总计 2 meck 3084. 7 10 3094. 77519 193824. 79 3 方小鱼 9657 10 9667. 00000 4 枫叶 5328.5 107 5435. 57230 5 树儿贝贝 6656 15 6671. 00000 6 自由飞翔 5484 10 5494. 00000 合计 39682. 162 39844. 5526 Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 14 of 15

---

Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 15 of 15 09:49 80 99 # 新战友接待室(允许广告) Deleted User 2020/12/22, 00:20 基于纽约七星会准农场(原为子孙爱七哥 农场)运行过程中出现了若干问题,以及农 场服务器操作不规范。 ●即日起由联盟委员会工作小组正式接管: !! 停止接收新战友加入 !! 停止所有G系列投资授权 !! 停止一切代表爆料革命和新中国联邦的活 动 由工作小组调查整顿后上报联盟委员会做 最后决定 谢谢战友们的支持 BS → 楓久 来啦。2020/12/22, 00:25 → 大家快来欢迎 山林小竹! 2020/12/22, 00:25 → 苦甜瓜#4472 出现了! 2020/12/22, 00:31 → 欢迎大驾光临,大宇886。2020/12/22,00:35 原始消息已删除 蓝色生机#4594 2020/12/22, 00:36 謝謝分享 → 欢迎大驾光临,太阳花7。 2020/12/22, 00:37 → 老蚂蚁 出现了! 2020/12/22,00:44 → xiaozhanglaoshi 刚刚滑入服务器中。 2020/12/22, 00:46 跳转到消息 Case: 26-361, 05/23/2026, DktEntry: 29.1, Page 15 of 15