---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q01e0346bed895a289c5b"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000108/pages/5"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "reb***"
date: "2026-05-05T01:45:32.241Z"
---

# reb*** 发言 (2026-05-05)

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000108/pages/5)
时间：2026-05-05T01:45:32.241Z
回复：[qe1af0154b36c94ee6cd5](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe1af0154b36c94ee6cd5) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> United States v. 92 Buena Vista Ave., 507 U.S. 111, 122 (1993) (criminal judgment does not automatically determine civil ownership for forfeiture purposes).

## 发言正文

> Honeycutt v. United States, 581 U.S. 443 (2017)： 被告不得因其未亲自获得的收益而被判处金钱裁决。