MUBEITECH

reb*** 发言

发言时间:2026-02-16 00:08:28

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论,包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇,并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节,为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据,引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

MarkdownJSON在批次中查看位置↗TG↗FB
发言原文
五、没有找到"必须等sentencing后才能mandamus forfeiture"的支持 Searched extensively for: Cases where circuits held mandamus unavailable before sentencing for § 853(n) issues Found: NONE Rules requiring waiting until sentencing Found: NONE Circuit splits on timing of forfeiture mandamus Found: No evidence of such split 实际找到的: Seventh Circuit in Kaufmann, 985 F.2d 884: Involved forfeiture issues No indication that court waited until sentencing Court reviewed on regular appeal timeline Federal Rules Commentary: Explicitly state ancillary proceedings must be before sentencing Contemplate that third-party issues are resolved before FOF Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 32.2: "Congress apparently assumed that the proceedings under the new provisions would involve simple questions of ownership that could, in the ordinary case, be resolved in 30 days." 30 days ≠ waiting until sentencing!