---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q381c79e57fa8d18a8cf9"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000054"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "chu***"
date: "2025-11-03T04:13:41.265Z"
---

# chu*** 发言 (2025-11-03)

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000054)
时间：2025-11-03T04:13:41.265Z

## 发言正文

> The prosecutors amended the indictment, introduced RICO, and removed the most easily established charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice. Why? Was the prosecutor merciful or guilty? These are all my guesses. I will not bear any legal responsibility. You can figure it out for yourself!
> 
> 
> Why did the prosecution's indictment give up the most easily established crime, obstruction of justice?
> The first version of the indictment, the twelfth charge against Guo Wengui, obstruction of justice!
> In Document 7, the prosecution's motion for pre-trial detention of Guo Wengui, regarding the obstruction of justice, Guo's encouragement of his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court is a very core accusation of obstruction of justice.
> When Guo Wengui applied for bail for the first time, one of the reasons for the prosecution's opposition was that Guo Wengui obstructed justice, among which Guo Wengui's encouragement of his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court was accused by the prosecution of obstruction of justice. Judge Torres also quoted the prosecution's statement that