---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q383fcd47b8c4a9177dd9"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/5"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "rui***"
date: "2025-12-09T11:11:11.647Z"
---

# rui*** 发言 (2025-12-09)

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/5)
时间：2025-12-09T11:11:11.647Z
回复：[q9e981898f7dcea927e06](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9e981898f7dcea927e06) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> Petitioner, pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to cease
>       suppressing his future filings, docket his submitted but undocketed motions, and rule on his
>       pending Rule 60(d)(3) motion. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the
>       mandamus petition is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that his right to the writ
>       is clear and indisputable, and that granting the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. See
>       Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004).

## 发言正文

> rule60 包含切尼里面