---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q463fa42d6d2a4011d84f"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000020/pages/5"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "pz0***"
date: "2025-07-30T04:57:33.314Z"
---

# pz0*** 发言 (2025-07-30)

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000020/pages/5)
时间：2025-07-30T04:57:33.314Z
回复：[q0d2264be73178617b60e](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q0d2264be73178617b60e) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> 刑事法庭怎么罚盖尔十万？

## 发言正文

> 美国宪法评注
> ArtIII.S1.4.3 Inherent Powers Over Contempt and Sanctions
> 
> The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that federal courts possess inherent authority to punish contempt—i.e., disobedience of a court order or obstruction of justice—and to impose other sanctions on parties or attorneys who engage in misconduct.