---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q463fa42d6d2a4011d84f"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000020"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "pz0***"
date: "2025-07-30T04:57:33.314Z"
---

# pz0*** 发言 (2025-07-30)

清洗后的社区讨论原话，按时间分批归档，固定首次采集版本，不随原作者后续编辑或删除更新，不含附件内容。含不同观点、推测与未经核实的主张，不代表本站结论或法院认定。导读仅供定位，请阅读完整发言及回复上下文，并结合一手文书核验。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000020)
时间：2025-07-30T04:57:33.314Z
回复：[q0d2264be73178617b60e](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q0d2264be73178617b60e) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> 刑事法庭怎么罚盖尔十万？

## 发言正文

> 美国宪法评注
> ArtIII.S1.4.3 Inherent Powers Over Contempt and Sanctions
> 
> The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that federal courts possess inherent authority to punish contempt—i.e., disobedience of a court order or obstruction of justice—and to impose other sanctions on parties or attorneys who engage in misconduct.