---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q504b8442fdae1a6d8bf6"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000074"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "reb***"
date: "2026-01-28T14:21:13.207Z"
---

# reb*** 发言 (2026-01-28)

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000074)
时间：2026-01-28T14:21:13.207Z
回复：[qf9b19e2fc137c72eef27](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf9b19e2fc137c72eef27) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> 你切尼入口怎么写的

## 发言正文

> PART II — LEGAL BASIS
> Mandamus standard (Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367)
> Petitioner must show:
> 1.    No adequate alternative remedy
> ✔ SDNY blocks docketing, no hearing, no rulings
> 2.    Clear & indisputable right
> ✔ §853(n) guarantees hearing before property may be forfeited
> 3.    Issuance appropriate under circumstances
> ✔ Asset dissipation + 3-year seizure + no judicial review
>  
> PART III — WHY CIRCUIT INTERVENTION IS REQUIRED NOW
> Because:
> •    Every month = irreversible loss of restrained property
> •    §853 hearing is mandatory, not discretionary
> •    SDNY has frozen due process itself, not assets
> •    DOJ both controls & spends assets → conflict of interest
> •    Delay appears systemic, not accidental
> •    Court does not need to rule ownership — only force SDNY to act