---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9e981898f7dcea927e06"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/5"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "rui***"
date: "2025-12-09T11:10:25.682Z"
---

# rui*** 发言 (2025-12-09)

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/5)
时间：2025-12-09T11:10:25.682Z

## 发言正文

> Petitioner, pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to cease
>       suppressing his future filings, docket his submitted but undocketed motions, and rule on his
>       pending Rule 60(d)(3) motion. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the
>       mandamus petition is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that his right to the writ
>       is clear and indisputable, and that granting the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. See
>       Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004).