---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb84b1b69ef0a05f98284"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000119/pages/3"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "him***"
date: "2026-06-15T23:50:02.412Z"
---

# him*** 发言 (2026-06-15)

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000119/pages/3)
时间：2026-06-15T23:50:02.412Z
回复：[qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe5c92ef123a7f0c43ae0) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> The
> U.S. Supreme Court has strictly mandated that the corporate fiction may
> only be cast aside upon a showing that the principal maintained
> "exclusive dominion and control" over the assets to the exclusion of
> all separate corporate minds (First National City Bank v. BANCEC, 462
> U.S. 611).

## 发言正文

> 不一定