---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe57c549ebec20fee921a"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000048"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "reb***"
date: "2025-10-19T05:34:31.366Z"
---

# reb*** 发言 (2025-10-19)

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000048)
时间：2025-10-19T05:34:31.366Z
回复：[qb4934ccfc058e23dbc3e](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb4934ccfc058e23dbc3e) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> CVRA权利简述您的地位：作为G-series投资者，您是“crime victim”（诈骗受害者），有权在量刑程序中表达观点，包括支持被告减轻量刑（e.g., “被告无辜，检方陷害加重了我们的损失”）。
> 权限：CVRA允许受害者在“sentencing or any parole proceeding”被听取，不限反对——支持性陈述合法（判例如United States v. Madoff, S.D.N.Y. 2009，受害者提交支持被告的声明影响量刑）。
> 
> 操作步骤：如何提交支持性陈述准备陈述：写简短声明（1-3页），用英文（或中英双语，附翻译）。焦点：您的受害者身份、支持被告减轻量刑的理由（e.g., “检方陷害被告，演员共谋加重了我们投资者的损失；减轻量刑能让真相浮出”）。签名/日期。
> 提交方式：直接向法院：通过Pro Se Intake Unit email（ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov）或邮寄（500 Pearl St., NY 10007），标题“Victim Impact Statement in Support of Leniency for Defendant Ho Wan Kwok in Related Proceeding for Yvette Wang (Case No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT)”。
> 抄送：检方/辩方律师（从docket获取email），王雁平辩护律师（提供支持）。
> 时间：听证前至少7-14天提交（§ 3771(a)(2)通知权），或程序中口头发言（请求remote via Zoom，国际pro se友好）。
> 
> 强制法院听取：如果不回应，提交“Motion to Enforce Victims' Rights under CVRA § 3771(d)(5)”，要求“forthwith hearing”。

## 发言正文

> 支持性陈述模板（英文，直接复制用，填个人信息）Subject: Victim Impact Statement in Support of Leniency for Defendant Ho Wan Kwok at SentencingDear Judge Analisa Torres,I am [Your Full Name], a victim of the alleged fraud in this case as an investor in the G-series entities. As a crime victim under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(4), I respectfully submit this statement for the sentencing of defendant Ho Wan Kwok, urging significant leniency.My investment in the G-series was destroyed not by Mr. Kwok, but by the Government's malicious overreach: unlawful seizure of assets by the bankruptcy trustee Luc A. Despins (Bankr. Dkt. 523, lacking due process), selective evidence manipulation to deny bail (Dkt. 733, Attachment A), and refusal to execute the forfeiture order (Dkt. 750), allowing over $60 million to be dissipated (Dkt. 724; Bankr. Dkt. 4691). This pattern of misconduct—evidentiary butchery and prosecutorial defiance—has trapped Mr. Kwok in a frame-up, exacerbating our losses as investors while the true perpetrators continue unchecked.Leniency for Mr. Kwok is essential for justice: his freedom could expose the fraud on the court, recover our stolen funds, and restore market order. Harsh sentencing would only perpetuate the injustice, burying the truth and our restitution hopes. I request the Court consider this and allow me to speak at the hearing (remote participation due to international location).Respectfully,
> [Your Full Name]
> [Your Address/Country]
> [Phone/Email]
> [Date]
> /s/ [Your Full Name]