---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qec418a7f427428f7fca0"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000075"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "yyy***"
date: "2026-01-29T15:17:36.223Z"
---

# yyy*** 发言 (2026-01-29)

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000075)
时间：2026-01-29T15:17:36.223Z
附件说明：原发言含附件，按归档规则不予归档或处理

## 发言正文

> 853N(6)(A)
> 
> (A) the petitioner has a legal right, title, or interest in the property, and such right, title, or interest renders the order of forfeiture invalid in whole or in part because the right, title, or interest was vested in the petitioner rather than the defendant or was superior to any right, title, or interest of the defendant at the time of the commission of the acts which gave rise to the forfeiture of the property under this section; or
> 
> 853(N)(6)(B)
> 
> (B) the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser for value of the right, title, or interest in the property and was at the time of purchase reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section;
> 
> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/853