---
canonical_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf9ed76c5edca965abf32"
batch_url: "https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/3"
content_type: discussion_message
speaker: "sar***"
date: "2025-12-08T04:40:30.016Z"
---

# sar*** 发言 (2025-12-08)

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

批次：[查看所在归档批次](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/3)
时间：2025-12-08T04:40:30.016Z
回复：[q923615a5e22bffbef1b8](https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q923615a5e22bffbef1b8) (查看被回复的发言（跨批次）)

被回复发言摘要：
> To prevent further retaliatory doxxing of CVRA victims, the only effective remedy
> under §1651(a) is to vacate all tainted orders and recuse the presiding judge.
> Thus, the SDNY’s retaliatory actions in leaking Dkt. 765 trigger my right to
> 
> 3. In light of the Cronic structural collapse described herein, issue supervisory
> directions to stay or vacate enforcement of the bail denial order, the
> preliminary forfeiture order, the conviction orders and the sentencing
> proceedings as well as any other tainted procedures resulting from these
> procedural defects, pending independent review.

## 发言正文

> 这是哪里出现的话？给二巡又发了新动议？还是以前的一小节？