---
type: court_doc
id: "court_ctb_404_26"
court: "CTB"
case_no: "22-50073"
doc_number: 404
doc_type: "EXHIBIT"
filed_date: "2022-05-20"
lang: "en"
machine_translated: false
url: "https://mubeitech.com/en/court/court_ctb_404_26"
json_url: "https://mubeitech.com/api/court/court_ctb_404_26"
---
# Guo Wengui / Miles Guo — bankruptcy case · EXHIBIT · ECF #404-26



EXHIBIT PAX 26

Transcript of Craig Jalbert Deposition

1 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 3 BRIDGEPORT DIVISION ------------------------------------------X 4 IN RE: 5 Chapter 11 HO WAN KWOK, 6 Case No. 22-50073(JAM) 7 Debtor. 8 ------------------------------------------X 9 10 DATE: April 8, 2022 11 TIME: 10:17 A.M. 12 13 14 VIDEO-RECORDED DEPOSITION OF CRAIG 15 JALBERT of VERDOLINO & LOWEY, P.C., in the 16 above entitled matter, at the above date 17 and time, held at the offices of O'Melveny 18 & Myers LLP, 7 Times Square, New York, New 19 York 10036, by Lenaya Lynch, a Notary 20 Public and Shorthand Reporter of the State 21 of New York. 22 23 24 25 Page 1 85

1　1

2 A P P E A R A N C E S:　C. JALBERT
3 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP　2
York. My name is Jonathan DiFilippo
Attorneys for PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA　3
4 OPPORTUNITY FUND LLP　from the firm Veritext and I am the
7 Times Square, 30th Floor　4
videographer. The Court Reporter is
5 New York, New York 10036　5
BY: LAURA ARONSSON, ESQ.　Lenaya Lynch from the firm, Veritext.

DAVID HARBACH, ESQ.
MaKENZIE B. RUSSO, ESQ.　6
I'm not authorized to administer an
7　7
oath. I'm not related to any party
8　8
BROWN RUDNICK LLP　in this action nor am I financially
9 Attorneys for HO WAN KWOK　9
interested in the outcome.
7 Times Square　10
10 New York, New York 10036　Counsel and all present in the
BY: KENNETH J. AULET, ESQ.　11
11　room and everyone attending remotely
12　12
will now state their appearances and
PULLMAN & COMLEY LLC　13
13 Attorneys for CREDITOR'S COMMITTEE　affiliations for the record. If
850 Main Street　14
there are any objections to the
14 PO Box 7006　15
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601　proceeding, please state them at the
15 BY: IRVE J. GOLDMAN, ESQ.　16
16　time of your appearance beginning
17 COHN, BIRNBAUM, SHEA P.C.　17
with the noticing attorney.
Attorney for GOLDEN SPRING　18
18 100 Pearl Street, Suite 12　MS. ARONSSON: Laura Aronsson,
New Haven, Connecticut 06103　19
O'Melveny and Myers for Pacific
19 BY: TIMOTHY MILTENBERGER, ESQ. via　20
Teleconference　Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LP.
20　21
21　MR. HARBACH: David Harbach
ALSO PRESENT:　22
with O'Melveny and Myers for the same
22　23
JON DIFILIPPO, Legal Videographer　client.
23　24
MS. RUSSO: Makenzie Russo with

*
*
*
25　25
O'Melveny and Myers for the same
Page 2　Page 4

1　1
C. JALBERT　C. JALBERT
2　2
THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good　client.
3　3
morning. We are going on the record　MR. AULET: Kenneth Aulet of
4　4
at 10:17 a.m. on April 22nd -- I'm　Brown Rudnick, proposed counsel for
5　5
sorry, April 8th, 2022. Please note　the debtor, Ho Wan Kwok.
6　6
that the microphones are sensitive　MR. GOLDMAN: Irve Goldman,
7　7
and may pick up whispering, private　Pullman and Comley, proposed counsel
8　8
conversations and cellular　for the Creditor's Committee.
9　9
interference. Please turn off all　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the
10　10
cell phones or place them away from　Court Reporter please swear in the
11　11
the microphone as they can interfere　Witness?
12　12
with the deposition audio. Audio and　MR. AULET: There's one person
13　13
video recording will continue to take　on the line.
14　14
place unless all parties agree to go　MR. MILTENBERGER: Are we done
15　15
off the record.　with the people in person? Timothy
16　16
This is Media Unit 1 of the　Miltenberger for Golden Spring, NY
17　17
video-recorded deposition of Craig　Limited.
18　18
Jalbert in the matter of re: Ho Wan　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the
19　19
Kwok filed in the United States　Court Reporter please swear in the

20　20
Bankruptcy Court, District of　Witness?
21　21
Connecticut, Bridgeport Division,　C R A I G J A L B E R T, called as a
22　22
Case Number 22-50073.　witness, having been first duly sworn by a
23　23
This deposition is being held　Notary Public of the State of New York, was
24　24
at O'Melveny and Myers LLP, located　examined and testified as follows:
25　25
at Times Square Tower, New York, New　EXAMINATION BY

Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

2 (Pages 2 - 5)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　MS. ARONSSON:　2　A.
Yes.
3　Q.
Please state your name for the　3　Q.
Do you understand that means
4　record.　4　that you're swearing that all of your
5　A.
Craig Jalbert, J-A-L-B-E-R-T.　5　answers are truthful?
6　Q.
What is your address?　6　A.
Yes.
7　A.
Home address? The business　7　Q.
And that you are subject to the
8　address is 124 Washington Street, Suite　8　penalty of perjury?
9　101, Foxboro, Massachusetts 02035.　9　A.
Yes.
10　Q.
Good morning. We previously　10　Q.
The Videographer is recording
11　met off the record. On the record, my name　11　everything on camera and the Court Reporter
12　is Laura Aronsson and I'm an attorney at　12　is preparing a written record of what we
13　O'Melveny and Myers for Pacific Alliance　13　discuss here today and will later produce a
14　Asia Opportunity Fund. Mr. Jalbert, have　14　copy of that transcript. Do you
15　you ever testified in court before?　15　understand?
16　A.
Yes.　16　A.
Yes.
17　Q.
In what case -- or I'll start　17　Q.
Unlike normal conversation, it
18　how many times?　18　is important that we not talk over one
19　A.
50, 60, 70 something.　19　another. Please wait for me to finish my
20　MR. GOLDMAN: Before we get too　20　question before you answer. I'll try to do
21　far into things, can I just ask --　21　the same for you. Do you understand?
22　this is a notice of deposition　22　A.
Yes.
23　relating to what contested matter?　23　Q.
Your answers need to be
24　There are a number of motions before　24　audible. A shake of the head is
25　the Court. The notice of deposition　25　insufficient as are statements like uh-huh.
Page 6　Page 8

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　doesn't indicate which of the matters　2　Do you understand?
3　it relates to.　3　A.
Understood.
4　MS. ARONSSON: Sure. So we　4　Q.
If you do not understand my
5　have -- we served a 30(b)6 notice of　5　question, please ask me to repeat.
6　deposition which I'll mark as an　6　Otherwise, I'll assume that you do
7　exhibit so that we're all on the same　7　understand the question. Is that okay?
8　page but it relates to the retention　8　A.
Yes.
9　of Verdolino and Lowey.　9　Q.
If you need a break, just let
10　MR. GOLDMAN: All right. I　10　me know and we can take one but if there's
11　just wasn't sure because it's not　11　a question pending, please answer it before
12　identified on the notice.　12　we break. Are you represented by Counsel
13　MS. ARONSSON: Thank you.　13　today?
14　Q.
Sorry. You said 50 or 60　14　A.
I think so.
15　times?　15　Q.
Who do you understand to be
16　A.
70, 80, I don't know. I have　16　representing you?
17　not kept -- I've got a list of ten years　17　A.
Ken Aulet.
18　that goes back 40 or 50 and I've been doing　18　Q.
If your attorney objects to a
19　it for 30. So no idea.　19　question, you should still answer it unless
20　Q.
Well, we can talk about some of　20　you don't understand the question or
21　the broad categories of experience you have　21　Counsel instructs you not to answer. Do
22　later but let's start just to go over a few　22　you understand?
23　procedures that I'm sure you're familiar　23　A.
Yes.

25　with. Do you understand that you're
testifying under oath today?　24
25　Q.
Are you suffering from any
condition that would impair your ability to

Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

3 (Pages 6 - 9)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　testify accurately or truthfully?　2　been designated to testify about each topic
3　A.
No.　3　listed here?
4　Q.
Are you taking any medications　4　MR. AULET: Objection.
5　that might interfere with your ability to　5　A.
Yes.
6　give accurate or truthful testimony?　6　MR. AULET: He's been
7　A.
No.　7　designated as per our responses and
8　Q.
Is there any reason why you　8　objections.
9　cannot testify truthfully and accurately　9　MS. ARONSSON: Thank you.
10　today?　10　Q.
Are you familiar with these
11　A.
No.　11　subject areas?
12　MS. ARONSSON: Tab one. The　12　A.
Yes.
13　Court Reporter is going to be marking　13　Q.
Do you understand that you are
14　what will be Jalbert Exhibit 1.　14　required to testify as to Verdolino and
15　(Whereupon, Notice of　15　Lowey's knowledge about these topics, not
16　Deposition was marked as Jalbert　16　just your own?
17　Exhibit 1 for identification as of　17　A.
Yes.
18　this date by the Reporter.)　18　Q.
Do you understand that you were
19　Q.
All right, Mr. Jalbert. Do you　19　required to obtain all of the knowledge and
20　recognize this document?　20　information necessary to allow you to fully
21　A.
I do.　21　and honestly testify concerning each of
22　Q.
What is it?　22　these topics upon Verdolino and Lowey's
23　A.
Pacific Alliance Asia　23　behalf?
24　Opportunity Fund LLP's Notice of Deposition　24　MR. AULET: Same objection as
25　of Verdolino and Lowey PC pursuant to Rule　25　before.
Page 10　Page 12
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil　2　A.
I did the best I could.
3　Procedure.　3　Q.
What, if anything, did you do
4　Q.
Is it your understanding that　4　to prepare for this deposition?
5　you are testifying today in connection with　5　A.
I spoke with attorney Ben
6　in re: Ho Wan Kwok?　6　Silverberg, with Counsel, Ken Aulet, I
7　A.
Yes.　7　spoke with my colleagues, Matthew Flynn and
8　Q.
Can you please turn to Page 6　8　Mary Jo Schindler. I reviewed a
9　--　9　significant amount of documents, some filed
10　A.
Excuse me, I just forgot to get　10　with the Court, some prepared internally.
11　my glasses.　11　Reviewed e-mails. Covered as much as I
12　MS. ARONSSON: Can we go off　12　could.
13　the record for one minute?　13　Q.
Did you collect the documents
14　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is　14　that you prepared or were they provided to
15　10:24 a.m. and we are off the record.　15　you by Counsel?
16　(Whereupon, an off-the-record　16　A.
The documents that -- are you
17　discussion was held.)　17　asking for the documents that we sent to
18　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is　18　O'Melveny?
19　10:24 a.m. and we're back on the　19　Q.
I'm asking -- taking a step
20　record. You may proceed.　20　back, just asking about your preparation
21　Q.
Can you turn to Page 6 to the　21　for today's deposition.
22　heading Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics?　22　A.
I just looked at my own
23　You see that?　23　documents and my own e-mails on the
24　A.
Yes.　24　Verdolino and Lowey server.
25　Q.
Do you understand that you have　25　Q.
Generally, what were the
Page 11　Page 13

4 (Pages 10 - 13)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　subject matters of those e-mails?　2　Q.
Anyone else besides the people
3　A.
It was looking at the -- all of　3　that we've talked about?
4　-- not all of them. Many of my e-mails,　4　A.
Regarding the -- just regarding
5　the SOFA's -- the statement of financial　5　the deposition?
6　affairs -- the schedules, the global notes,　6　Q.
Yes.
7　the global notes and specific notes, most　7　A.
No.
8　of the pleadings to employ professionals,　8　Q.
You haven't spoke to the
9　particularly ours, the motion for the DIP　9　debtor?
10　financing, many of the objections, not all　10　A.
About the deposition?
11　of them. I'm trying to think if there's　11　Q.
About the deposition.
12　anything else. I can't think of anything　12　A.
No.
13　off the top beyond that --　13　Q.
Have you ever met the debtor?
14　Q.
Thank you. That's helpful. So　14　A.
Yes.
15　you mentioned that you spoke to your　15　Q.
When did you meet the debtor?
16　attorneys, Ben and Ken?　16　A.
The continued meeting of 342 --
17　A.
Yes.　17　or 341 meeting which was I think Wednesday,
18　Q.
When did you speak to them?　18　the first time I met him.
19　A.
Well, we were delayed a little　19　Q.
Is that the only time you met
20　bit so I had a few minutes this morning　20　the debtor?
21　with Ken. I spoke with Ben briefly last　21　A.
Yes.
22　night. Again, this morning on -- unrelated　22　Q.
Outside of the 341 proceeding,
23　to the deposition and I had previously　23　did you interact with the debtor?
24　spoken to Ken probably one or two times　24　A.
No.
25　over the last few days, give or take.　25　Q.
I just want to cover a little

Page 14　Page 16
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
Were each of these interactions　2　bit of your background. Can you talk about
3　over the phone?　3　your educational history since high school?
4　A.
Until today, yes.　4　A.
I graduated from Western
5　Q.
About how long did you spend　5　Connecticut High School in 1979. I went to
6　preparing with your attorneys in connection　6　Boston College. Graduated Boston College
7　with your preparation for this deposition?　7　with a bachelor of science and degree in
8　A.
I would have to hazard a guess.　8　accountancy in 1983. I went to work for
9　I don't have my time records in front of　9　Arthur Andersen from June of '83 till
10　me.　10　August 31 of '87. On September 1 of 1987,
11　Q.
Like two hours, ten hours?　11　I started at the precursor of what is now
12　A.
My guess is in the two to four　12　Verdolino and Lowey and I've been there in
13　hour range. No more than that.　13　the 35 years since and during that time, I
14　Q.
Did you speak to anyone else　14　I've gone to many, many, many professional
15　other than the folks that you mentioned at　15　CPE type courses of all sorts of flavors.
16　Verdolino and Lowey and your attorneys　16　Q.
What do you mean by CPE?
17　regarding this deposition?　17　A.
A continuing professional
18　A.
Our IT person, Tim McDonald who　18　education.
19　assisted in the search -- the electronic　19　Q.
Is that a required procedure
20　search of e-mails and records and worked　20　for any type of certification that you
21　with the Brown Rudnick IT person to send　21　have?
22　everything over. Aside from having him try　22　A.
It's -- some of it is required
23　and get the records, we didn't have any　23　for my certification as a certified
24　discussion of the case facts and　24　insolvency restructuring advisor. The rest
25　circumstances or anything.
Page 15　25　are just to maintain my professional

5 (Pages 14 - 17)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　capabilities and stay on top of various　2　responsible for this?
3　issues as the years have gone on.　3　A.
Well, my partner and various
4　Q.
So you mentioned certified　4　staff.
5　insolvency instructor?　5　Q.
What's his name?
6　A.
Certified insolvency　6　A.
Keith Lowey.
7　restructuring advisor. CIRA.　7　Q.
Is that department involved in
8　Q.
So this is a professional　8　this matter before us?
9　certification?　9　A.
No.
10　A.
Yes.　10　Q.
Is Verdolino and Lowey always
11　Q.
Do you hold any other　11　engaged by the debtor in the bankruptcy
12　professional certifications besides the　12　context?
13　CIA?　13　A.
No.
14　A.
CIRA, no.　14　Q.
What other scenarios is
15　Q.
CIRA. I think you said you had　15　Verdolino and Lowey engaged under?
16　a accountant degree from Boston College?　16　A.
We've been engaged by trustees,
17　A.
Yes.　17　post confirmation fiduciaries, whatever
18　Q.
Do you hold any other graduate　18　they may be called; you said debtors,
19　or any graduate degrees?　19　creditors' committee, creditors, secured
20　A.
No.　20　lenders. I think we've probably
21　Q.
Are you currently employed at　21　represented, over the years, most every
22　Verdolino and Lowey?　22　kind of party and interest to a bankruptcy
23　A.
Yes.　23　that there is.
24　Q.
Generally, what services does　24　Q.
Turning to your experience
25　Verdolino and Lowey offer its clients?　25　specifically, what experience do you have

Page 18　Page 20
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　A.
There were three or four -- I　2　in Chapter 11 cases?
3　guess four major buckets. The first and　3　A.
I've been in over 500 Chapter
4　biggest is the insolvency arena,　4　11 cases. We've been committee financial
5　underperforming businesses and individuals.　5　advisor, committee accountants, debtor
6　That includes litigation support and　6　financial advisor, debtor accountants,
7　everything related to it. We have a　7　accountants on behalf of secured lenders,
8　full-time 13 or 14 people I think it is　8　accountants on behalf of individual
9　that work in taxation and we also do what　9　creditors. Trying to think -- I mean
10　I'll call high net worth babysitting. We　10　again, we've done -- we've represented
11　have -- and I don't do any of this work.　11　pretty much every constituency so over
12　My partner and others do it but we have　12　time, I've done -- I've represented every
13　very wealthy clients that don't pay their　13　reasonable constituency in a bankruptcy I
14　own bills, that have multiple residences.　14　can remember.
15　Everything comes to us. We act as a family　15　Q.
What is your title at Verdolino
16　office for a whole -- for a number of　16　and Lowey?
17　people and the last thing we do is federal　17　A.
Principal.
18　election reporting for federal congress　18　Q.
We talked about the four
19　people and senators and presidential.　19　buckets. Generally, what are your
20　Q.
Thank you.　20　responsibilities with respect to Verdolino
21　A.
Did I say we have tax　21　and Lowey services?
22　department -- yes, tax department. That's　22　A.
Just for the most part, the
23　the four.　23　first -- all of my time not spent running
24　Q.
You mentioned the high net　24　my own firm is in the bankruptcy insolvency
25　worth baby sitting. Who, at Verdolino, is
Page 19　25　and the like that spreads over a little bit

6 (Pages 18 - 21)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　to taxation. I don't run the department or　2　generally regarding the engagement?
3　anything but I certainly interact and then　3　A.
There was a little bit with
4　litigation support and the like, you know,　4　Steven Pohl and with -- I believe it was
5　the types of things you would do in the　5　Ben Silverberg.
6　context of a bankruptcy.　6　Q.
Anyone else at Brown Rudnick?
7　Q.
What is meant by litigation　7　A.
I don't remember.
8　support, generally?　8　Q.
Besides Brown Rudnick, did you
9　A.
Well, it can be pretty broad　9　speak to anyone else regarding the
10　but for us, it's -- whether it be business　10　potential engagement?
11　litigation or bankruptcy litigation, to the　11　A.
I probably mentioned something
12　extent that there are areas that whoever　12　to my -- my own staff to clear conflicts
13　the law firm -- we've also been appointed　13　and I think I had someone help me prepare
14　by judges, anyone that's looking or　14　some -- I shouldn't say prepare, they're
15　interested in obtaining financial　15　already prepared. Send some individual
16　information in a form that they're looking　16　information about myself and the firm.
17　for, which could be anything, we would　17　Q.
Did Verdolino and Lowey speak
18　provide it. That would include doing　18　to anyone else besides Brown Rudnick in
19　expert reports, expert testimony and work　19　connection with the engagement?
20　at just advising lawyers as they approach　20　MR. AULET: Objection. You can
21　areas in accounting and auditing and the　21　answer.
22　like.　22　A.
At the time we're being
23　Q.
You mentioned here that you're　23　engaged?
24　a principal at Verdolino and Lowey?　24　Q.
Yes.
25　A.
Yes.　25　A.
No.
Page 22　Page 24
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
What other roles have you held?　2　Q.
Who are the main points of
3　A.
I've been a principal since I　3　contact between -- who are the main
4　started.　4　contacts for -- strike that. Who do you
5　Q.
Turning to the engagement here,　5　generally speak to regarding this

who contacted Verdolino and Lowey about　6　engagement besides internal folks at
7　this engagement?　7　Verdolino and Lowey?
8　A.
Well, it was contacted me　8　A.
Mostly the attorneys at Brown
9　personally and it was an attorney, Steven　9　Rudnick.
10　Pohl at Brown Rudnick.　10　Q.
Do you speak to anyone else?
11　Q.
Sorry, I missed what you said.　11　A.
I've been on phone calls with
12　MR. HARBACH: Spell that name.　12　other lawyers but I've not initiated
13　Q.
Can you spell that name,　13　anything.
14　please?　14　Q.
Which other lawyers have you
15　A.
The name was Steven Pohl. Last　15　been on phone calls with?
16　name P-O-H-L at Brown Rudnick.　16　A.
The other debtor lawyers that
17　Q.
Mr. Pohl reached out to who at　17　I'm aware of are an Aaron Mitchell and a
18　Verdolino and Lowey?　18　Melissa Francis.
19　A.
Me.　19　Q.
Who do you understand Aaron
20　Q.
You. Do you recall when that　20　Mitchell to be?
21　was?　21　A.
Counsel to Mr. Kwok, the
22　A.
Somewhere around March 1, 2 or　22　debtor.
23　3.　23　Q.
You mentioned Melissa Francis?

25　Q.
After Steven Pohl reached out,
who did Verdolino and Lowey speak to　24
25　A.
Also counsel to Mr. Kwok.
Q.
Besides Aaron Mitchell and

Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

7 (Pages 22 - 25)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Melissa Francis, do you speak to anyone　2　Q.
So I'll just go on record to
3　else outside of Verdolino and Lowey　3　say that we dispute that contention.
4　regarding this engagement?　4　MR. GOLDMAN: As do we. Who
5　A.
And outside of Brown Rudnick?　5　are you -- who do you fear harassment
6　Q.
Outside of Brown Rudnick, yes.　6　from? Do you fear harassment from?
7　A.
No one.　7　MR. AULET: So Mr. -- Golden
8　Q.
What about -- what about do you　8　Spring's attorney is on the phone and
9　communicate via e-mail with anyone besides　9　that question is probably best
10　Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Brown　10　directed to Golden Springs but my
11　Rudnick regarding this engagement?　11　understanding is that -- please, he
12　A.
I've been on -- I've been CC'd　12　would like to answer.
13　on an e-mail and authored one e-mail to　13　MR. MILTENBERGER: Tim
14　someone outside that group.　14　Miltenberger from Golden Springs.
15　Q.
Who is that person?　15　I'm assuming what the Witness is
16　MR. AULET: Objection. This is　16　testifying to is the identity of a
17　the person that we have stated their　17　Golden Spring employee which isn't
18　identity won't be revealed per Golden　18　clear to me from the record but
19　Springs request.　19　apparently the people at the
20　MS. ARONSSON: Are you　20　deposition reached that conclusion.
21　instructing the Witness not to　21　We don't see any relevance in
22　answer?　22　revealing the name of the employees
23　MR. AULET: I am instructing　23　of Golden Spring based on the
24　him not to answer.　24　objection that's filed to the DIP
25　MS. ARONSSON: Can you just　25　financing motion and we think that
Page 26　Page 28

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　state --　2　the privacy rights of our employees
3　MR. GOLDMAN: Can you repeat　3　are paramount to any information that
4　the question?　4　might be gathered from knowing the
5　(Whereupon, the referred-to　5　name of -- rank and file employees of
6　question was read back by the　6　Golden Spring and we oppose
7　Reporter.)　7　disclosing that information.
8　THE WITNESS: That should have　8　MR. GOLDMAN: That's up to the
9　been e-mails. I authored one but I　9　Judge. It's a totally inappropriate
10　was CC'd on e-mails.　10　instruction to direct the Witness not
11　Q.
I understand Mr. Aulet is　11　to answer. The Witness can answer
12　instructing you not to answer.　12　and you can get a ruling from the
13　MS. ARONSSON: Mr. Aulet, do　13　Judge as to whether the answer should
14　you mind just providing a more　14　be stricken or protected or subject
15　detailed objection?　15　to a protective order. It's totally
16　MR. AULET: Sure. Based on my　16　inappropriate to direct the Witness

18　conversations with Golden Spring, my
understanding is that Golden Spring　17
18　not to answer.
MS. ARONSSON: I noted our
19　believes that revealing that　19　dispute with Mr. Aulet and I'll just
20　individual's name would potentially　20　note our dispute with Mr.
21　expose them to harassment and based　21　Miltenberger's reasoning behind the
22　on my review of the documents at　22　objection here.
23　issue, the person's identity is not　23　MR. MILTENBERGER: Thank you.
24　relevant to the issues at hand in　24　Q.
Turning back to the folks we
25　this deposition.　25　were just talking about, you mentioned

8 (Pages 26 - 29)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Melissa Francis. Did she represent to you　2　sure I wasn't missing anything.
3　that she was Mr. Kwok's counsel?　3　Q.
Besides the attorneys at Brown
4　A.
No.　4　Rudnick, did you circulate drafts of that
5　Q.
How did you learn about what　5　engagement letter to anyone else?
6　Ms. Melissa Francis -- who Mr. -- strike　6　A.
I don't recall anyone else
7　that. How did you learn who Ms. Francis'　7　being on it but I'm pretty sure they then
8　client was?　8　did circulate it with -- at a minimum, Ms.
9　A.
From Brown Rudnick.　9　Melissa Francis and probably Aaron Mitchell
10　Q.
We've talked about the folks at　10　as well.
11　Verdolino that you communicate with this　11　MS. ARONSSON: Tab 11. The
12　engagement. Do you know of anyone else　12　Court Reporter is going to hand you
13　that Verdolino and Lowey communicates with　13　what is being marked as Jalbert
14　regarding this engagement besides the folks　14　Exhibit 2. This document -- for the
15　that we've talked about?　15　record, this document bears the Bates
16　A.
I don't think there were others　16　Number Kwok 00001646.
17　but it is possible that one of my　17　(Whereupon, E-mail Chain was
18　colleagues met Flynn. Might have had　18　marked as Jalbert Exhibit 2 for
19　e-mail contact. You're aware -- because I　19　identification as of this date by the
20　think you objected to -- there's a large　20　Reporter.)
21　number of ordinary course professionals.　21　Q.
Before we get to the exhibit,
22　We needed to get information about　22　what is a post-petition retainer?
23　liabilities to them for the schedules.　23　A.
My understanding would be a
24　There might have been some information and　24　retainer paid to whoever, after the filing
25　stuff because we needed -- it's possible　25　of a bankruptcy, intended to be a retainer.
Page 30　Page 32
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　that he spoke with them but I think really　2　Q.
Can you please turn to Page 2
3　what he did is he got all the information　3　of this document? Take a minute. At the
4　from Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis. I　4　top of Page 2, Mr. Silverberg says that
5　don't think he went outside of that but　5　there's no post-petition retainer expected.
6　it's possible.　6　Do you see that?
7　Q.
Do you know where Aaron　7　A.
Yes.
8　Mitchell and Melissa Francis retrieved　8　Q.
Do you recall whether you had a
9　their information from?　9　preference about receiving a post-petition
10　A.
No.　10　retainer?
11　Q.
Did you ask them where they　11　A.
Well, every professional would
12　retrieved their information from?　12　rather have a retainer but frankly, under
13　A.
No.　13　the circumstances, it wasn't expected.
14　Q.
Who negotiated -- who, from　14　Q.
Starting with your preference,
15　Verdolino and Lowey, negotiated the　15　why would you prefer to have a
16　engagement letter?　16　post-petition retainer?
17　A.
It would be me. I don't know　17　A.
Security against the payment of
18　that I would call it a negotiation but it　18　the fees.
19　was me that drafted it and prepared it and　19　Q.
Do you know whether you
20　sent it to Brown Rudnick.　20　received a post-petition retainer in
21　Q.
Anyone else involved in　21　connection with this case?
22　drafting that engagement letter?　22　A.
I do.
23　A.
Well, from a QPC perspective,　23　Q.
Did you?

25　I'm sure I had one of my colleagues, Mary
Jo Schindler take a look at it just to make　24
25　A.
No.
Q.
And why not?
Page 31　Page 33

9 (Pages 30 - 33)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　A.
I didn't ask for one.　2　A.
Yep.
3　Q.
Turning back to the e-mail, Mr.　3　Q.
Did you ask for a post-petition
4　Silverberg writes, "big Q is whether it's　4　retainer in connection with this
5　us retaining you or the client. I would　5　engagement?
6　think you're retained by the client as his　6　A.
No.
7　financial advisor". Do you recall that　7　Q.
Do you know if Verdolino and
8　being a question in connection with this　8　Lowey asked for a post-petition retainer in
9　engagement?　9　connection with this engagement?
10　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　10　A.
I do.
11　A.
I don't think I understand your　11　Q.
What's the answer?
12　question. I can read the statement and　12　A.
No.
13　understand but I don't know what you're　13　Q.
You also write, "but I think if
14　asking.　14　we are going to hold the cash, we will need
15　Q.
He says, "big Q", do you　15　to be employed by the debtor". So does
16　understand that to be a big question?　16　that refresh your recollection about
17　A.
I understand it might be a　17　whether it was a question about who was
18　question in his mind. I don't know that he　18　retaining Verdolino and Lowey?
19　intended it to be a question for me or for　19　A.
I don't think I had a question

20　himself and then he answered it.　20　in my mind. I just responded with a
21　MS. ARONSSON: Makenzie, can　21　comment that supported his previous comment
22　you hand me Tab 12?　22　where he said I would think you're retained
23　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Mr. Jalbert,　23　by the client as his financial advisor.
24　would you mind moving the water　24　Q.
Generally, can you explain your
25　bottle? It's coming up in the frame.
Page 34　25　view in connection with the question

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　I apologize. Thank you.　2　Mr. Silverberg poses about who was
3　THE WITNESS: Sorry about that.　3　retaining Verdolino and Lowey?
4　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: I appreciate　4　A.
Well, I was pretty sure when he
5　that.　5　wrote I would think you're going to be
6　MS. ARONSSON: The Court　6　retained by the client as his financial
7　Reporter is going to mark what is　7　advisor, that's -- I made a gratuitous
8　going to be Jalbert Exhibit 3. This　8　comment or not a gratuitous comment. I
9　document is Bates stamped Kwok　9　made an assenting comment basically saying
10　00001649.　10　I think if we're going to hold the cash, we
11　(Whereupon, E-mail Chain was　11　need to be employed by the debtor. So
12　marked as Jalbert Exhibit 3 for　12　concurring with the decision or the thought
13　identification as of this date by the　13　that he had.
14　Reporter.)　14　Q.
What is the basis for the
15　Q.
Please take a look at this　15　understanding that you just explained?
16　document.　16　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
17　A.
Okay.　17　A.
Of what part?
18　Q.
You're responding to Mr.　18　Q.
Where, turning to your e-mail,
19　Silverberg's e-mail that we were just　19　"if we are going to hold the cash, we'll
20　speaking about with the big Q is whether　20　need to be employed by the debtor". What's
21　it's us retaining you or the client.　21　the basis of that statement?
22　A.
Okay.　22　A.
Well, my professional judgment.
23　Q.
Turning to your response, you　23　If me, as a principal of Verdolino and
24　note, "I'd like a post-petition retainer if　24　Lowey, was going to be the signer on a
25　possible". Do you see that?
Page 35　25　debtor in possession bank account, it would

10 (Pages 34 - 37)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　make all the sense in the world that that　2　A.
Well, frequently in matters,
3　debtor in possession was my client. So I'm　3　we -- the firm gets brought in and we do
4　concurring effectively with the　4　whatever work is intended on that
5　determination that Mr. Silverberg made in　5　particular engagement. Frequently, it's
6　the previous e-mail to this chain.　6　litigation support. If it's intended that
7　Q.
Thank you. Just for my own　7　we do an investigation, the lawyer's
8　understanding, what is the difference　8　thinking ahead, look, you're going to do an
9　between being employed by the debtor versus　9　investigation, we think this is what we're
10　Brown Rudnick?　10　going to find. Then we're going to have to
11　A.
Well, if I was employed by　11　get a expert report to file with a
12　Brown Rudnick, I'm not sure I'd go　12　particular court. Then we might need you
13　through -- I'm not sure I would have to go　13　to go through the process of discovery
14　through the employment process for the　14　including records, depositions and the like
15　bankruptcy. Would I file a motion to be　15　and then we might need you to testify. In
16　employed? I don't know. I don't know the　16　those particular cases, as I understand it,
17　answer to that question. It's not　17　there would be privilege up to a certain
18　something that I thought of beyond this.　18　point, up until the time I'm declared an
19　So -- but if I was right and there wouldn't　19　expert but in other instances, we get
20　be an opportunity to file a motion to　20　brought in as -- as financial advisor to
21　employ Verdolino and Lowey on behalf of the　21　the attorneys. They want us to do an
22　debtor, I don't know how we would then　22　investigation. They want us to uncover
23　allow me to be a signatory on the debtor's　23　whatever need to be uncovered, whatever the
24　account.　24　allegations are, whatever the issues are
25　Q.
Thank you. That's helpful.　25　but they might be hiring another firm or

Page 38　Page 40
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Did you rely on Brown Rudnick in connection　2　individual to testify as the expert to keep
3　with that determination of who would be　3　what knowledge we have as privileged. I
4　retaining Verdolino and Lowey?　4　don't know that that's relevant here.
5　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　5　Q.
Thank you. Turning back to
6　A.
Well, Mr. Silverberg writes in　6　Exhibit 2 --
7　his e-mail, "I would think you're retained　7　MR. MILTENBERGER: I'm sorry to
8　by the client as his financial advisor" and　8　interrupt. I'm being called away to
9　the next e-mail, same day, when I got　9　another matter so I'm going to have
10　around to it at 6:49 p.m. -- so five hours　10　to drop off now. The record could
11　had elapsed -- I basically concurred with　11　just note that I'm leaving the
12　his determination. Who made the decision,　12　deposition.
13　I don't know. It's semantics but I think　13　MR. HARBACH: Thank you, Tim.
14　it was clear from this point on, that we　14　You're welcome to rejoin anytime.
15　were going to be retained by the debtor and　15　MR. MILTENBERGER: Will do,
16　not Brown Rudnick.　16　thanks.
17　Q.
Is Verdolino and Lowey ever　17　Q.
I'm interested in your e-mail
18　retained by a law firm in connection with　18　at the top where you write, "my feeling is

20　bankruptcy proceedings?
A.
We're frequently retained by　19
20　that in an individual case, the FA" --
financial advisor -- "duties are markedly
21　lawyers in proceedings. I think even　21　different than of an operating business
22　including in bankruptcy proceedings for the　22　case". Can you explain to me the
23　purposes of the privilege.　23　difference between an individual case
24　Q.
What do you mean by for　24　versus an operating business case?
25　purposes of the privilege?
Page 39　25　A.
So operating business cases

11 (Pages 38 - 41)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　have their various size and shapes. They　2　engagement, no one informed you what needed
3　may have affiliated entities, parents,　3　to be done on this case?
4　siblings. It could be multiple debtors.　4　A.
Well, we had been party to
5　They might have employees in various　5　numerous conversations. This is not my
6　countries, various states. They may have　6　first bankruptcy. It's not my 50th
7　payroll taxes un-filed, sales taxes　7　bankruptcy. It's not my 100th bankruptcy.
8　un-filed, depending on the business, bottle　8　I had a fairly good idea of what the issues
9　deposits un-filed and unkept. They　9　were going to be and I took the first pass.
10　probably need a lot more work on budgeting　10　I don't recall whether there were changes
11　and keeping the business operating. Does　11　made after that or not.
12　it have sufficient cash, what are the 13　12　Q.
Generally, what is the scope of
13　week budgets, the one year budgets. Cash　13　Verdolino and Lowey's work in this case?
14　collateral where it's -- you've got a　14　A.
In this case?
15　secured creditor who is frequently -- maybe　15　Q.
Yes.
16　not against the debtor but maybe not with　16　A.
Well, the retention papers
17　it either. So -- so there's just -- it's a　17　speak for themselves. So if you want to go
18　totally different beast. In this　18　line by line, put that in front of me.
19　particular case, some individuals have　19　Q.
Sure.
20　operating real estate or something like　20　A.
To date, we've been focused
21　that but they rarely have an operating　21　on -- first, my recollection is the SOFA's
22　business that's multi country, multi state　22　and the schedules pretty much
23　with employees and all sorts of reporting　23　simultaneously. I mean they were due the
24　requirements, compliance requirements.　24　same day, same time. So that was first.
25　Q.
Is it fair to say the financial　25　Following -- immediately following that, I
Page 42　Page 44

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　advisor duties in connection with an　2　believe we worked on everybody's engagement
3　operating business case are more　3　papers to get them filed in the Court and
4　complicated than an individual case?　4　then -- probably while the tail end of that
5　A.
In most, yes.　5　was going along, I believe my colleague,
6　Q.
Turning away from the exhibit,　6　Matt Flynn, started preparing the monthly
7　who instructed Verdolino and Lowey on the　7　operating report that was due for the end
8　scope of work in this matter?　8　of February, sometime around March 20, 21,
9　A.
I don't think anyone instructed　9　22, somewhere around there. Trying to
10　us.　10　think if we've done anything -- oh
11　Q.
Because you drafted the　11　assistance in preparing for -- or
12　engagement letter?　12　participation in preparing, to a small
13　A.
I'm sure there were discussions　13　degree, for the debtor to attend the 341
14　with counsel. I don't remember the　14　meeting. We attended the first day 341
15　discussions specifically but this is not　15　meeting by telephone. My colleague, Matt
16　the first time I've drafted a retention --　16　Flynn and I, attended the second day of the
17　at least part of the retention papers.　17　341 hearing which was this past Wednesday
18　Obviously, I'm not a lawyer. I don't know　18　on a -- how do I want to call it -- we
19　all of that goes into retention papers but　19　didn't bill for our time. I went as an
20　as to the duties, typically, I have an　20　observer. We knew we weren't going to be
21　input as to what the duties are. I'm sure　21　participating but we wanted to be around to
22　we took the first stab at it and in review　22　see what took place, meet people and then
23　by Brown Rudnick, they might have made some　23　this deposition.

25　changes. I don't remember how that went.
Q.
In connection with the　24
25　Q.
Thank you. So I think I heard
the SOFA's and schedules were the first

12 (Pages 42 - 45)

Page 46 1 C. JALBERT 2 step. You talked about drafting everyone's 3 engagement papers in connection with this 4 matter. 5 A. Well, drafting our engagement 6 papers. Everyone was focusing on their own 7 and I needed help, because I'm not a 8 lawyer, on mine. 9 Q. Then you talked about Matt 10 Flynn's responsibilities in connection with 11 the monthly operating report. 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Finally, you talked about 14 preparing for the 341 hearing and attending 15 the 341 hearings? 16 A. Meeting, yes. 17 Q. Can you describe a little bit 18 more your responsibilities in connection 19 with those 341 meetings? 20 MR. AULET: I would just 21 caution the Witness not to disclose 22 any work product or conversations 23 with attorneys. 24 A. On the first day of the 341 25 meeting, it was just thought that we should Page 47 1 C. JALBERT 2 participate because it was unclear what was 3 going to arise and they didn't know if it 4 would be something that we would need. 5 Q. Setting aside your 6 conversations with your attorneys, what -- 7 did you have any understanding about what 8 might arise during the first day of the 341 9 hearing that might require your 10 participation? 11 A. I've attended an awful lot of 12 341 meetings over my career. Anything can 13 happen at a 341 meeting because it's open 14 to every creditor and god only knows what 15 takes place. 16 Q. Did you anticipate having to 17 participate or ask questions during the 18 341? 19 A. I think we were asked to be on 20 the phone. I didn't have a participation 21 one way or another. 22 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 23 Reporter is going to hand you what is 24 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 4. 25 (Whereupon, Debtor's Page 48 1 C. JALBERT 2 Application was marked as Jalbert 3 Exhibit 4 for identification as of 4 this date by the Reporter.) 5 MS. ARONSSON: For the record, 6 this is a document entitled Debtors 7 Application for Authorization to 8 Retain and Employ Verdolino and Lowey 9 PC as Financial Advisor. It was 10 filed in this case as Docket 90. 11 Q. Mr. Jalbert, feel free to look 12 at this document. 13 A. Is there something you're 14 trying to point me to? 15 Q. Do you recognize this document? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. What is it? 18 A. Debtor's Application for 19 Authorization to Retain and Employ 20 Verdolino and Lowey PC as Financial 21 Advisor. 22 Q. Turning to Page 18 of the 23 document, using the page numbers at the top 24 of the page, what is this document? 25 A. Affidavit of Craig R. Jalbert Page 49 1 C. JALBERT 2 in Support of Debtor's Application for 3 Authorization to Retain and Employ 4 Verdolino and Lowey PC as Financial 5 Advisor. 6 Q. So you recognize this as your 7 affidavit you filed -- 8 A. I do. 9 Q. Turning to Page 21, the table 10 -- I'm interested in the table at the 11 bottom of the page. 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Just stepping back I think you 14 mentioned folks at Verdolino who were 15 involved, Matt Flynn -- in this case, Matt 16 Flynn, Mary Jo Schindler and yourself. Is 17 there anyone else involved in this matter 18 at Verdolino and Lowey? 19 A. I mentioned Tim MacDonald, our 20 IT person who is only involved with -- 21 related to the deposition, the search of 22 our e-mails and the server records and 23 everything and getting it ported over to 24 Brown Rudnick to be then sent to you folks. 25 Q. Anyone else at Verdolino and

> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

13 (Pages 46 - 49)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　Lowey?　2　different than any other engagement. You
3　A.
Not that I know of.　3　don't know what's going to happen in
4　Q.
Turning to this table, is Matt　4　day-to-day and everyone responds as best
5　Flynn also a principal?　5　they can, as efficiently as they can and
6　A.
No.　6　whatever the issues are that are ongoing
7　Q.
What is Matt Flynn's role?　7　and the crises that materialize.
8　A.
A manager.　8　Q.
What about staff, what sort of
9　Q.
Is Mindy Jo Schindler a　9　role do you anticipate any potential staff
10　principal?　10　to play in this case?
11　A.
No.　11　A.
It will depend on how it plays
12　Q.
What is her role?　12　out. I don't think it's going to happen
13　A.
Manager.　13　but if it did and we became -- I became the

14　Q.
So in connection with this　14　sole signer on the debtor in possession
15　engagement at Verdolino and Lowey, there's　15　bank account, my firm would probably be --
16　one principal, two managers and then the IT　16　the bookkeepers would probably keep records
17　person?　17　of the disbursements and the receipts.
18　A.
I believe so, yes.　18　They would assist with reporting. I would
19　Q.
Do you anticipate other　19　probably review it of course. If, at some
20　Verdolino and Lowey employees to become　20　point in time, we have claim objections, I
21　involved in this matter?　21　don't know what the nature of those
22　A.
As the case progresses,　22　objections are going to be, I don't know
23　assuming that we come into the case, yes.　23　how big and how complicated but some of our
24　Q.
Generally, what are the duties　24　staff might be involved in claims. The
25　of a principal in connection with a
Page 50　25　debtor might have to file an income tax

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　bankruptcy case like this?　2　return. I'll be advising them that they
3　A.
I think of it as partner,　3　should file an income tax return for the
4　director, managing director, any of those,　4　Estate. So we'll have tax people involved
5　the lead person on the case from the firm.　5　in the preparation of the income taxes and
6　Q.
In connection with this matter　6　I would have to go down the list of -- and
7　specifically, what do you expect the　7　be able to predict exactly what's going to
8　principal to be doing?　8　take place but we're very efficient, very
9　A.
I assisted in preparation of　9　accustomed. We know all of our fees are
10　the SOFA's and schedules, the global notes,　10　subject to review by every single party and
11　the specific part of the global notes. I　11　interest. So we're -- we use as reasonably
12　assisted with the monthly operating report.　12　low level as we can on every matter and I
13　I participated with the first day hearings　13　can't predict beyond that what's going to
14　-- excuse me, first -- not the first day　14　come up but that staff and bookkeepers get
15　hearing. The first day of the 341 meeting.　15　used for those types of issues.
16　Responding to inquiries from the various　16　Q.
Is it fair to say your answer
17　lawyers and supporting staff on whatever　17　to my question about staff applies to the
18　roles that they are working on.　18　bookkeepers, to the role of the
19　Q.
What do you expect managers to　19　bookkeepers?
20　do in connection with this case?　20　A.
No, bookkeepers and staff.
21　A.
The same -- the same things.　21　Q.
So the answer that you just
22　Maybe differing amounts, different types.　22　gave applies to both of those?
23　I'm more review. Depending on what it is,　23　A.
You asked what they may do.
24　they might support me. I might support　24　Q.
Right.
25　them. It's like this engagement is no
Page 51　25　A.
They're -- the bookkeepers

14 (Pages 50 - 53)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　aren't going to do reporting but they're　2　A.
From my firm?
3　going to maintain receipts and　3　Q.
Who at V&L?
4　disbursements. A staff person would　4　A.
Myself, Matthew Flynn and Mary
5　probably work on the form of the -- of a　5　Jo Schindler.
6　financial statement or whatever report　6　Q.
Who else was involved in
7　that's going to be issued. The staff are　7　preparing these filings?
8　going to work on claims objections. Tax　8　A.
There might have been a
9　professionals are going to work on tax　9　technical question for someone related to
10　returns.　10　the best case but I can't think of anything
11　Q.
Are you finished with your　11　else -- anyone else that had any -- that
12　answer?　12　did work on it.
13　A.
Yes.　13　Q.
Did Brown Rudnick work on the
14　Q.
You mentioned receipts and　14　SOFA and schedules?
15　disbursements. What sorts of receipts and　15　A.
You asked me for my firm. Of
16　disbursements do you anticipate in this　16　course they worked on them, as did Melissa,
17　case?　17　as did -- that's Melissa Francis. As did
18　A.
I would imagine if things were　18　Aaron Mitchell. So it was clearly not all
19　to go the way the debtor planned, there was　19　Verdolino and Lowey. It was -- the whole
20　a proposed DIP financing arrangement where　20　team was involved in the preparation. I
21　money will come into the Estate and then　21　thought you asked me -- and if I
22　would presumably be used to pay various　22　misunderstood, I apologize -- you asked
23　professionals and United States Trustee　23　who, at Verdolino, did and that was myself,
24　fees and whatever other disbursements are　24　Matt Flynn and Mary Jo Schindler.
25　required of the debtor as ordered by the　25　Q.
Thank you. Yes, I did ask

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Court or otherwise generally required to　2　Verdolino and Lowey and was then moving on.
3　pay Chapter 11 bills as they become due. I　3　So you mentioned Melissa Francis, Aaron
4　think that's it.　4　Mitchell, Brown Rudnick. Generally, anyone
5　Q.
The last item is clerical.　5　else?
6　What sort of duties do you anticipate a　6　A.
While I never spoke to them,
7　clerical member of your team to do in this　7　there must have been the existence of help
8　case?　8　from individuals that translated documents
9　A.
I don't have anything that I　9　and words from the various professionals to
10　have presupposed for them to do in this　10　the debtor and the debtor.
11　case.　11　Q.
Did you communicate with the
12　Q.
Turning back in the document to　12　debtor about this SOFA and schedules?
13　the retention agreement, this is on Page　13　A.
No.
14　13. We've talked generally about the　14　Q.
You mentioned some translated
15　engagement -- Verdolino and Lowey's　15　documents. Did you receive those
16　engagement in this case. I want to walk　16　translated documents in connection with
17　through these bullet points on the first　17　your work on the SOFA and schedules?
18　page. The first one reads, "assistance　18　A.
No. I don't read Mandarin.
19　with preparation of the statement of　19　Q.
Did you see any translated
20　financial affairs and the schedules and all　20　documents?
21　support thereto and any amendments". These　21　A.
I don't recall seeing them.
22　have been filed, right?　22　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
23　A.
Yes.　23　Q.
Do you know whether Golden
24　Q.
Who was involved in preparing　24　Spring was involved in preparing the SOFA
25　the SOFA and the schedules?
Page 55　25　and schedules?

15 (Pages 54 - 57)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　A.
I wouldn't know.　2　doing in connection with the SOFA and
3　Q.
Do you know what Golden Spring　3　schedule?
4　is?　4　A.
I don't know that it's
5　A.
Yes.　5　anticipated but to the extent facts and
6　Q.
What is it?　6　circumstances, at some point in time,
7　A.
It's -- as I understand it -- a　7　require a review and possible amendment, I
8　family office in New York City for the　8　think we would have to participate because
9　debtor's son. Exactly how it's run, all　9　we're the ones that know Best Case and have
10　that, I don't have any information.　10　that system but there's nothing
11　Q.
Who is the debtor's son?　11　anticipated. It's only if that
12　A.
I don't know his name.　12　materializes, we would participate.
13　Debtor's son.　13　Q.
You've said -- you've mentioned
14　Q.
Neither you nor anyone at　14　Best Case a couple times. What do you mean
15　Verdolino and Lowey met with or　15　by that?
16　communicated with the debtor about the SOFA　16　A.
It's a software that the
17　and schedules?　17　industry uses. I think it's the most
18　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　18　prominent software that supports the
19　A.
Correct.　19　preparation of SOFA's and -- SOFA's and the
20　Q.
Can you describe what work　20　schedules. I think they're used throughout
21　Verdolino and Lowey did in preparing the　21　the industry by most everybody.
22　SOFA and schedules?　22　Q.
So is it fair to say it's like
23　A.
We participated with several　23　a TurboTax of preparing SOFA's and
24　lengthy phone calls with various people　24　schedules?
25　from Brown Rudnick, not all of whom I'm　25　A.
Or QuickBooks or -- you know.
Page 58　Page 60

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　going to remember were on the phone and　2　Q.
So that software is essentially
3　also with Melissa Francis and Aaron　3　garbage in, garbage out, right?
4　Mitchell. Aaron Mitchell and Melissa　4　MR. AULET: Objection.
5　Francis provided significant levels of　5　A.
Every software is garbage in,
6　input of various information. Brown　6　garbage out.
7　Rudnick had been involved in the case　7　Q.
Turning to the second bullet
8　before we were. They already had a large　8　point in the retention agreement, it reads,
9　knowledge base so we -- we talked with　9　"assistance with preparation and/or review
10　Brown Rudnick team and Melissa and Aaron on　10　of cash flow and related budget projections
11　the phone and then numerous e-mails.　11　and including advising as to post-filing
12　THE WITNESS: I agree. Hot.　12　finances". Do you see that?
13　MR. HARBACH: Yeah, I tried to　13　A.
Yes.
14　keep out the sun.　14　Q.
What work has Verdolino and
15　Q.
Did Verdolino and Lowey perform　15　Lowey done in connection with this line
16　any investigation to verify information　16　item?
17　obtained from Brown Rudnick, Melissa　17　A.
Nothing.
18　Francis or Aaron Mitchell?　18　Q.
What work does Verdolino and
19　A.
No.　19　Lowey anticipate doing in connection with
20　Q.
So is it fair to say you took　20　this line item?
21　their word regarding the representations　21　A.
Anticipate doing this if we're
22　contained in the SOFA and the schedule?　22　in the case and there's a DIP.
23　A.
That's fair.　23　Q.
So it includes budget
24　Q.
Is there any outstanding work　24　projections. Budget projections for who?
25　that Verdolino and Lowey will anticipate
Page 59　25　A.
I imagine we will try and

16 (Pages 58 - 61)

Page 62 1 C. JALBERT 2 establish what a budget would be for -- for 3 instance, committee counsel and its 4 financial advisors, debtor's counsel and 5 their financial advisors, the United States 6 Trustees fees. There were a number of 7 firms that were intended to be ordinary 8 course professionals and any other 9 anticipated disbursement in the case that's 10 approved in one way, shape or form by court 11 order. 12 Q. It also includes review of cash 13 flow. What cash flow? 14 A. The DIP money. 15 Q. The debtor has no income, 16 right? 17 A. To my knowledge, correct. 18 Q. Have you reviewed the debtor's 19 declaration filed in this case? 20 A. I certainly reviewed one or two 21 of the drafts of it. I don't know that I 22 saw the final or not. I don't remember. 23 Q. Are there cash flows coming in 24 from any source at the moment? 25 A. Into the Estate? Page 63 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. Yes. 3 A. Not to my knowledge. 4 Q. Your knowledge of the debtor's 5 lack of income is based on what you've been 6 told, is that right? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. No independent investigation in 9 connection with his income? 10 A. Correct. 11 Q. This line item also references 12 post-filing finances. What is meant by 13 that? 14 A. He filed on February 15th. 15 Whatever finances, cash receipts, cash 16 disbursements, budgeting from that day 17 forward. 18 Q. The third line item reads, 19 "opening and maintaining the DIP account 20 and effectuating disbursements when 21 necessary and providing accounting of all 22 cash activity". Is it your understanding 23 there's a DIP loan here? 24 A. No. 25 Q. Do you anticipate there being a Page 64 1 C. JALBERT 2 DIP loan in this case? 3 A. Hope so. 4 Q. Do you have experience with DIP 5 loans? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. How much experience do you 8 have? 9 A. I don't know how many hundred 10 cases with DIP loans. 11 Q. What work has Verdolino and 12 Lowey done in connection with this line 13 item? 14 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 15 A. We're talking about the third 16 one, right, opening and maintaining the DIP 17 account? 18 Q. Yes. 19 A. The only thing I did, when 20 asked by Brown Rudnick if I'd be willing, 21 is I consulted with a bank that does -- 22 that's on the list of approved financial 23 institutions of the Department of Justice. 24 I checked with that bank, which I use 25 frequently in and out of bankruptcy, to Page 65 1 C. JALBERT 2 confirm that they would allow me to be a 3 signer on the DIP account and they 4 responded in yes. That's the extent of 5 which I've done on that. 6 Q. Is that Citizens Bank that 7 you're referencing? 8 A. Yes. 9 Q. Has Verdolino and Lowey been 10 involved in the negotiation of the 11 potential DIP loan? 12 A. No. 13 Q. Has Verdolino and Lowey been 14 included on any communications regarding 15 the potential DIP loan? 16 A. I don't know. 17 Q. Have you personally been 18 involved in any written or oral 19 communications regarding the DIP loan? 20 A. I don't recall any. 21 Q. Do you have an understanding as 22 to how the potential DIP loan would be 23 structured? 24 A. Well, I briefly read the DIP 25 loan at some point in time. I don't have 85

> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

17 (Pages 62 - 65)

Page 66 1 C. JALBERT an explicit memory of every -- of the whole thing but I know generally how DIP loans work. 5 Q. In this case, do you know how the DIP loan would potentially be structured? 8 A. I would have to be guessing at my memory. 10 Q. Who, at Verdolino and Lowey, would perform the work in connection with this line item? 13 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 14 A. Presupposing that there is a DIP loan? 16 Q. Yes. 17 A. It would -- as repeating, obviously, I would be the signatory on the account. There would be bookkeepers and staff associated with preparing the checks, preparing the reports and reporting to all the parties that be. Some -- I imagine the committee would want to know -- generally, they would like to know on a weekly or biweekly basis what receipts and Page 67 1 C. JALBERT disbursements are, major creditors might feel the same way. So whatever the -- whatever the case is, reporting requirements as they develop, we would take care of that. I don't know what they would be. Aside from the minimum requirement, the monthly operating report. 9 Q. What is Verdolino and Lowey's run rate up until this point? 11 A. What's a run rate? 12 Q. How much has Verdolino and Lowey billed to this matter? 14 A. We've billed zero so far. 15 Q. How much value does Verdolino anticipate it has already billed in this case? 18 A. Are you asking for a WIP to date? 20 Q. What is a WIP to date? 21 A. Work in process hours? 22 Q. Yes, please. 23 A. I have no idea. 24 Q. Does Verdolino and Lowey have any agreement with anyone regarding who Page 68 1 C. JALBERT will pay the fees in the event the DIP loan does not occur? 4 A. No. 5 Q. Let's turn to the next line item, "preparation, review and analysis of monthly operating reports and/or quarterly reporting". Do you see that? 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. You referenced earlier a monthly operating report that was recently filed in this case? 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. Is that the type of work anticipated in this-- in connection with this line item? 17 A. Well, going forward, there's going to be a lot more than a monthly operating report because there's going to be -- well, presumably, if there is a DIP and if the case continues, there's going to be receipts and disbursements and even if there aren't, the monthly operating report and the US Trustees Office requires that -- the disclosure of all estate professionals Page 69 1 C. JALBERT as they accrue throughout the case. So it didn't happen in the February one because of the scrambling of SOFA's and schedules and 341 meeting and everything else. Going forward, we're going to have to have a report on a monthly basis and a cumulative basis what everybody's fees are, what the cash in and cash out is and part of the monthly operating report calculates the fees due to the United States Trustee Program and then the monthly operating report, you typically have to also -- you attach to it insurance binders, if things expired. If they weren't usually -- usually, I put them in anyway just to avoid confusion and someone looking for it. And then complete copies of the bank statements. The United States Trustees Office also wants balance sheet and P&L and cash flow and what the accounts payable, accounts receivable and all the various -- so the first one was filed. Future ones are going to have a lot more information. 25 Q. Taking a step back, can you

> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

18 (Pages 66 - 69)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　just explain, generally, what a monthly　2　A.
The United States Trustee
3　operating report is in a Chapter 11　3　issues bills predicated on the monthly
4　individual case?　4　operating report, to what the expenses that
5　A.
It's the same or pretty close　5　meet the definition of a disbursement on
6　to the same I think as the operating report　6　account of the U.S. Trustees form, they
7　in a commercial case. It looked like it to　7　combine the three months in every calender
8　me anyway's. But it's the standard --　8　quarter. So for us, it will be the
9　during the pendency of the case, the　9　February 15th, the February 28th stub
10　operating report, that is required by the　10　period, plus the March 1 to March 31, that
11　US Trustees Program, up until the case is　11　MOR. The sum of those 45 days will be in a
12　dismissed, converted or confirmed.　12　bill from the U.S. Trustees Office and,
13　Q.
So the procedures that you　13　assuming it's correct, would have to be
14　described relating to the work on the　14　paid before the end of -- I believe this
15　monthly operating report, that presupposes　15　month.
16　the approval of the DIP loan and managing　16　Q.
So is it fair to say that
17　of those funds. Is that right?　17　Verdolino and Lowey is retained to review
18　A.
Well, the monthly operating　18　the quarterly report?
19　report is going to be due irrespective of　19　A.
I don't know if it's listed in
20　that. The -- the accrual of the -- of the　20　here specifically but certainly the monthly
21　fees of committee counsel, us, the　21　operating report is the form that is the
22　accountant advisor, the debtor, debtor　22　input to the United States Trustees Office
23　committee, others, whoever might be paid by　23　in order to create the bill. So we know --
24　the Estate including th ordinary course.　24　and it's the fees are statutorily
25　Even if there's not a DIP, that has to be　25　determined based on the level of
Page 70　Page 72

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　reported in the monthly operating report.　2　disbursements. It's very easy to double
3　Q.
You prepared one monthly　3　check their work. We would do that and
4　operating report to date?　4　make sure that the number is right. It's
5　A.
In this case?　5　frequently wrong because sometimes they
6　Q.
In this case, is that right?　6　issue the bill before the March statement
7　A.
Yes.　7　actually hits. So they're estimating.
8　Q.
Is another monthly operating　8　They're generally off -- not their fault --
9　report in progress?　9　in the first quarter because it's not a
10　A.
Yes.　10　full quarter. They don't have a basis for
11　Q.
Did you also prepare -- scratch　11　making estimates, whatever the case may be
12　that. Did Verdolino and Lowey also prepare　12　but we would -- we would ensure that the
13　the estimated monthly operating expenses　13　fee paid to the U.S. Trustees is
14　contained in the schedule?　14　appropriate under the circumstances.
15　A.
To what are you referring to?　15　Q.
Turning to the next line item,
16　Q.
We can come back to that.　16　"assistance with preparation and/or review
17　A.
Okay.　17　of estate federal and state income tax
18　Q.
Have you or Verdolino and Lowey　18　filings". What work has Verdolino and
19　prepared a quarterly report in this case?　19　Lowey done in connection with this line
20　A.
The United States Trustee　20　item?
21　quarterly report?　21　A.
Nothing.
22　Q.
Yes.　22　Q.
I think you mentioned before
23　A.
No. We don't prepare that,　23　that you were going to recommend the filing
24　they do.　24　of income taxes. Why do you recommend that
25　Q.
What is a quarterly report?
Page 71　25　in this case?

19 (Pages 70 - 73)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　A.
I recommend it in every case.　2　legally required or not with a 505(b)
3　So individual estate tax returns,　3　letter.
4　individual estates is a separate --　4　Q.
Do you anticipate that multiple
5　completely separate and distinct entity　5　returns will be filed in this matter if the
6　from the individual as opposed to in a　6　debtor chooses to file returns.
7　corporate case, the corporation retains its　7　A.
Well, I don't know what the
8　tax identity. You continue to file　8　debtor is going to do and again, it has no
9　C-corporation returns if they're a　9　bearing on the Estate and no bearing on
10　C-corporation, S Corp., partnership,　10　Verdolino and Lowey but the Estate will
11　whatever the case may be and their year end　11　have to file -- I'll recommend that it file
12　remains whatever their year end was　12　a federal return. The debtor is a resident
13　established pre-petition. In a bankruptcy　13　of Connecticut so there would be a
14　estate, the Estate is separate and distinct　14　Connecticut estate tax return and if, for
15　from the individual. The individual has to　15　some reason, there was income from another
16　continue to file his own individual income　16　state, we would file from whatever state
17　taxes with whatever his individual income　17　that that income came. So I don't know
18　that doesn't come into the Estate. In a　18　what it's going to be but it's at least
19　Chapter 11 case, virtually all of the　19　going to be Connecticut and the IRS.
20　debtor's income is supposed to come into　20　Q.
I think we covered before, it's
21　the Estate. So there really shouldn't be a　21　your understanding that the debtor has no
22　separate one but technically, there could　22　income in this case?
23　be. The Estate is -- the Estate return is　23　A.
Correct.
24　generally assigned to be December 31,　24　Q.
What work do you anticipate
25　unless you elect otherwise. There are　25　Verdolino and Lowey will do in connection

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　reasons to elect otherwise but the most　2　with an individual tax return for the
3　important point is in order to get the --　3　debtor?
4　the relief that's in the bankruptcy code　4　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
5　under Section 505b, in order to get that　5　A.
Well, I'd have to guess what's
6　relief, you have to file a tax return. So　6　going to take place between February 15 and
7　I recommend, even when there's no tax due,　7　December 31. I don't know whether there
8　that the return gets filed in order to　8　will be any income or not. There's

10　protect all -- everybody in the case to
make sure that there is not an issue that　9
10　litigation going on. There might be
settlements. I don't know whether there'll
11　gives the various taxing authorities 60　11　be income or not but if there is, there'll
12　days from the date of filing with the　12　be income. From what source, I don't know
13　505(b) letter to elect to audit it. It's　13　and from where, I don't know but at a
14　the way that the case can move forward to　14　minimum, there will be disbursements and in
15　closure and not have the seven year　15　a bankruptcy, there's two types of expenses
16　statute, three year statutes and the like.　16　from a tax perspective. There are
17　So I recommend everyone does the 505(b).　17　administrative expenses like professional
18　If they don't elect to audit it in the　18　fees and there are other types of expenses
19　first 60 days, then they lose the　19　that are normal to an individual. Mortgage
20　opportunity. If they select it for audit,　20　interest, real estate taxes, whatever the
21　then they got another 120 days. I want --　21　case may be. They are treated in different
22　I recommend it in every single case,　22　ways on the tax return but one of the
23　individual or corporation or partnership or　23　reasons why you would file a return is the

25　LLC, that the tax returns get filed whether
they're necessary or not, whether they're　24
25　-- for tax purposes in a bankruptcy estate,
the fees paid to professionals are

20 (Pages 74 - 77)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　deductible and you can build them up like a　2　A.
I have no -- it's not my
3　deferred tax asset. So to the extent, in　3　problem or interest what happens to the
4　the future -- after we spend money on the　4　debtor, outside of the bankruptcy estate.
5　case, if, in the future, there was a large　5　He's going to have to hire a different
6　settlement agreement, you would be able to　6　accountant to deal with that.
7　offset the previous administrative NOL's　7　Q.
Let's talk about the Estate.
8　against the future income --　8　A.
If the Estate has tax
9　THE COURT REPORTER: The　9　transactions, as I said, I would recommend
10　previous administrative --　10　the Estate files tax returns on a timely
11　THE WITNESS: N-O -- net　11　basis and it would include whatever
12　operating losses against a future　12　transactional activity that is allowed
13　receipt, which is another reason to　13　under the -- both the bankruptcy code and
14　file the return.　14　the internal revenue code and I don't know
15　Q.
Is it fair to say that the work　15　what that's going to be.
16　that Verdolino and Lowey anticipates　16　Q.
Turning to the next line item,
17　potentially doing in connection with tax　17　it reads, "assistance with reviewing
18　returns depends on whether cash is coming　18　reconciling, analyzing and if necessary,
19　into the debtor or the Estate in the　19　objecting to proofs of claim". What work
20　future?　20　has Verdolino and Lowey performed in
21　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　21　connection with this line item?
22　A.
No. You're going to have --　22　A.
None.
23　you're going to have accrued expenses　23　Q.
Just generally, what does --
24　depending on the -- when the timing of the　24　what is a proof of claim?
25　case and everything, accrued expenses can　25　A.
It's a form. There's a form.
Page 78　Page 80

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　be deductible. So cash -- clearly, if　2　There's a bankruptcy form that's a proof of
3　there were cash, that would -- that would　3　claim. I don't remember what the form
4　have to be taken care of but depending on　4　number is but it's an opportunity for any
5　how this case goes and the timing, it's　5　alleged creditor to file a claim in either
6　entirely possible that some of the accrued　6　a Chapter 11 or a Chapter 7 case. They can
7　expenses would be deductible.　7　file claims on a secured basis, a priority
8　Q.
Have you seen the debtor's most　8　basis, an administrative basis and I'm sure
9　recent tax returns?　9　there's more that I'm missing. I don't
10　A.
I don't know that I would be　10　think there's a claims objection deadline
11　able to call them most recent tax returns　11　but at some point in time, in a Chapter 11,
12　but I've seen parts. I don't know if it's　12　there's usually a claims objection
13　the whole thing. I don't know if I saw the　13　deadline. If, however, a creditor has been
14　entire federal and the entire state but I　14　scheduled on Schedule D, E or F and that
15　-- I at least saw the New York return and　15　number happens to be right, then the
16　the federal version attached to the New　16　creditor does not have to file a claim as I
17　York return which may or may not be the　17　understand it. If they disagree because
18　entire federal return for 2019 I think and　18　it's owed more or less -- and rarely do
19　2020.　19　they disagree if they're owed less but if
20　Q.
If the debtor's income is zero,　20　they're owed more, they're allowed to file
21　what do you anticipate deducting from?　21　a proof of claim and establish what they
22　MR. AULET: Objection.　22　think the amount due to them from the
23　A.
Are we talking about the debtor　23　bankruptcy estate would be.

25　individually or the Estate?
Q.
Let's start with the debtor.　24
25　Q.
Have you reviewed any of the
pending litigation claims in this matter?

21 (Pages 78 - 81)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　A.
No.　2　someone to do work on a preference
3　Q.
What experience does Verdolino　3　analysis. We certainly participated in
4　and Lowey have in analyzing the likelihood　4　preparing that because we filed them.
5　of success in pending litigation claims?　5　Q.
Do you know how many
6　A.
Absolutely none.　6　pre-petition payments were disclosed in
7　Q.
Turning to the next line item,　7　this case?
8　"assistance with reviewing debtor books and　8　A.
No.
9　records for possible avoidable transactions　9　Q.
Does 21 sound about right?
10　such as preference and fraudulent transfer　10　A.
I don't know.
11　claims". Do you see that?　11　Q.
So the line item refers to
12　A.
Yes.　12　debtor books and records for possible
13　Q.
Can you explain to me,　13　avoidable transactions. Have you reviewed
14　generally, what this means?　14　any debtor books and records in connection
15　A.
The bankruptcy code allows a　15　with this engagement?
16　look back period. For preferences, it　16　A.
No.
17　allows 90 days prior to the filing for　17　Q.
Has Verdolino and Lowey
18　preference claims and I'll let lawyers　18　reviewed any books and records in
19　define what that is and insiders and other　19　connection with this engagement?
20　fraudulent transfers take place between　20　A.
No.
21　zero days and I've heard it's -- whatever　21　Q.
Is it fair to say that
22　the statute happens to be for whatever the　22　Verdolino and Lowey relies on the
23　issue might be, one year, two years, four　23　assistance of other parties in connection
24　years, whatever the case maybe but it's a　24　with this line item?
25　search through transactions to see if any　25　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
Page 82　Page 84
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　of them might be avoidable and recoverable　2　A.
Are you talking about past
3　to the Estate.　3　tense or future tense?
4　Q.
What analysis has Verdolino and　4　Q.
Past tense.
5　Lowey performed in connection with this　5　A.
We relied on other individuals
6　line item?　6　for everything that we did from an
7　MR. AULET: I would caution the　7　information perspective.
8　Witness to the extent that there is　8　MR. AULET: We've been going
9　anything, not to disclose any　9　for awhile so if you need a break --
10　specifics.　10　THE WITNESS: No, let's get the
11　MS. ARONSSON: Sorry, what do　11　-- let's do it all at once. I would
12　you mean?　12　like to get out of here before
13　MR. AULET: That if he has done　13　tonight.
14　any work, it would be covered by the　14　MR. GOLDMAN: We are going to
15　work/product privilege. Not to　15　break at 12.
16　disclose those specifics.　16　MR. HARBACH: Yes, sir.
17　Q.
Setting aside the work/product　17　Q.
Okay, turning to the next line
18　protection that Brown Rudnick is alleging　18　item, "assistance with any necessary
19　in connection with this line item, can you　19　litigation support". I think we covered
20　answer the question?　20　this previously. Do you have anything to
21　A.
Well, one of the questions in　21　add about potential services in connection
22　the SOFA's is payments made in the 90 days　22　with this line item that we haven't already
discussed?

prior to bankruptcy. I don't know if　23
24　that's necessarily a surprise to anybody　24　A.
Not that I can remember.
25　but that is usually the starting place for
Page 83　25　Q.
Has Verdolino and Lowey done

22 (Pages 82 - 85)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　any work in connection with this line item　2　assets is on liquidated litigation claims?
3　to this date?　3　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
4　A.
In this case, no.　4　A.
If we did, it would be awfully
5　Q.
The next -- turning to the next　5　small.
6　line item is "assistance with plan　6　Q.
Understood. Are you aware of
7　development and preparation including　7　any draft plans currently being circulated?
8　feasibility". What does this mean?　8　MR. AULET: Objection. He's
9　A.
Well, in order to have a　9　already testified that he hasn't
10　successful Chapter 11, you have to confirm　10　performed any work on this. So I
11　a plan of reorganization or whatever the　11　don't see what the relevance is to
12　title will be when it's prepared and　12　V&L's retention.
13　created. It might even be a joint plan for　13　MS. ARONSSON: Sure. I'm
14　all I know. In those plans, there　14　curious though about ongoing work in
15　typically is some budgeting because　15　connection with this line item.
16　sometimes payments to creditors are paid　16　MR. AULET: He can answer if
17　out over time. We might assist in　17　he's doing any current work with it.
18　preparing the cash flow projections of　18　A.
None.
19　receipts and disbursements for some future　19　Q.
Turning to -- turning to the
20　time period and my -- I'm not a lawyer but　20　next line item on the next page, it reads,
21　as I understand it, in order to confirm a　21　"general consulting and assistance with any
22　Chapter 11, you must prove that the　22　other matters and tasks that may arise and
23　creditors are getting a better return from　23　as may be directed by you or the debtor".
24　the Chapter 11 plan than they would have in　24　Is it fair to say this is kind of a
25　a Chapter 7 case and that usually requires　25　catch-all?
Page 86　Page 88

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　that you -- well, you're going to have　2　A.
Yes. It's a catch-all with the
3　feasibility and you're going to have --　3　caveat -- this is not my first rodeo -- if,
4　what's the other one -- term is slipping my　4　for some reason, there's a discreet task
5　mind -- I can't remember it but it didn't　5　that is going to be required that will be
6　list it anyway's.　6　comprehensive and costly, we would file a
7　Q.
The line item says feasibility　7　motion to amend our employment, what would
8　and I think you mentioned that as well.　8　be covered by the employment but as to --
9　What does feasibility mean?　9　you know, for instance, sometimes they get
10　A.
You -- the projections is　10　a notice from the IRS that requires 15
11　usually the evidence with which to allow　11　minutes for someone to respond to. I know
12　the Court and other parties in interest to　12　little -- little cats and dogs that happen
13　determine what the future cash flows will　13　that don't happen to fit into something
14　be and make their own decision based on　14　else, it's a catch-all for the minutiae.
15　that as to whether the debtor's plan is　15　Not intended to be a catch-all for major
16　financially feasible and the Judge　16　line items and that's only to protect me.
17　obviously has the final determination but　17　Q.
Understood. What work or
18　usually everyone puts their two cents in.　18　analysis has Verdolino performed in
19　Q.
What analysis has Verdolino and　19　connection with this line item, if any?
20　Lowey done to date in connection with this　20　A.
None that I know of.
21　line item?　21　Q.
Are you familiar with a company
22　A.
None.　22　called Stretto?
23　Q.
Would Verdolino and Lowey have　23　A.
Yes.
24　a function in developing a plan if the　24　Q.
What do they do?
25　debtor's estate's only source of income or
Page 87　25　A.
I don't know everything that

23 (Pages 86 - 89)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　they do but they do claims agent work and　2　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
3　other bankruptcy-related work. I don't　3　A.
Yes.
4　know what their list of services are. I've　4　Q.
You mentioned before that you
5　hired them myself in cases. I think　5　have worked with Stretto in the past?
6　they're still working for me on a case or　6　A.
Well, they're in the same --
7　two right now in a limited basis.　7　some of the same -- well, a couple. One or
8　Q.
Are you aware that Stretto was　8　two of the same cases that we're in.
9　involved in this matter?　9　Q.
Do you have an understanding as
10　A.
I'm aware that there's a motion　10　to whether Stretto could open and maintain
11　to employ them, yes.　11　a DIP account?
12　Q.
Generally, what is your　12　A.
No.
13　understanding of the scope of work that　13　Q.
Do you have an understanding
14　Stretto would potentially be employed to　14　about whether Stretto could monitor
15　do?　15　disbursements in connection with a DIP
16　A.
I have not read their motion to　16　account?
17　employ. No idea what their --　17　A.
No.
18　MS. ARONSSON: Let's go off the　18　Q.
Turning to the books and
19　record. Thank you.　19　records line item, the seventh bullet
20　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is　20　point, I'm going to ask you to assume that
21　11:53 a.m. and we are off the record.　21　there are 21 professional service providers
22　(Whereupon, a brief recess was　22　who have received a pre-petition payment in
23　taken.)　23　the 90 days before filing. I'm also going
24　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time　24　to ask you to assume that Stretto can
25　period is 12:22 p.m. We're back on　25　provide analysis with respect to those
Page 90　Page 92

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　the record.　2　payments. Why is it necessary for
3　Q.
Just wrapping up the questions　3　Verdolino and Lowey to perform these
4　related to Exhibit 4. Turning back to the　4　duties?
5　line item about opening and maintaining the　5　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
6　DIP account, would you agree that a bank or　6　It calls for speculation.
7　an escrow agent could open and maintain a　7　A.
Most everybody that has half a
8　DIP account?　8　brain can do that. It's not going to be
9　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　9　done by me.
10　A.
I don't have any knowledge of　10　MS. ARONSSON: The Court
11　why they couldn't but I'm certainly not an　11　Reporter is going to hand you what is
12　expert.　12　being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 5.
13　Q.
What about monitoring　13　(Whereupon, Official Form
14　disbursements and effectuating　14　106Sum was marked as Jalbert Exhibit
15　disbursements?　15　5 for identification as of this date
16　A.
The bank doing it?　16　by the Reporter.)

18　Q.
Yes.
A.
I don't think the bank's going　17
18　MS. ARONSSON: I'll say for the
record, this is a document that has
19　to do it.　19　been filed as Docket Number 78 in
20　Q.
Or an escrow agent.　20　this case.
21　A.
An escrow agent would have more　21　Q.
Do you recognize this document,
22　obligation, whatever the escrow agreement　22　Mr. Jalbert?
23　says. I don't --　23　A.
Yes.
24　Q.
But an escrow agent could be　24　Q.
What is it?
25　employed to perform those duties?
Page 91　25　A.
The first page is the official

24 (Pages 90 - 93)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　form 106Sum which is the summary of assets　2　Q.
Item 58 refers to Line 36?
3　and liabilities and certain statistical　3　A.
Okay.
4　information for the debtor, Ho Wan Kwok.　4　Q.
So 36, just up the page, the
5　Q.
I think we've discussed earlier　5　total amount here is 3,850 dollars. Do you
6　that Verdolino and Lowey had a role in　6　see that?
7　preparing the SOFA and schedule. Is that　7　A.
Yes.
8　right?　8　Q.
So 36 wraps up into one number.
9　A.
Yes.　9　Part 4 of this filing, is that fair?
10　Q.
Verdolino and Lowey had a role　10　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
11　in preparing this document?　11　A.
Well, when you mean this
12　A.
Yes.　12　filing, are you talking about Part 4 of
13　Q.
I just want to walk through　13　Schedule A/B.
14　this at a high level. The first line item　14　Q.
I am, yes. Thank you for the
15　is -- item one relates to property. What　15　clarification.
16　does this line item include?　16　A.
I would agree that Line 36 is
17　A.
What specific -- A, B or C or　17　the sum of Part 4 which starts at question
18　all of them?　18　16.
19　Q.
Sorry, fair question. 1A.　19　Q.
What analysis, if any, did
20　A.
Well, it reads "Schedule A/B　20　Verdolino and Lowey perform in connection
21　Property official form 106A/B", question or　21　with these line items?
22　1A, "copy Line 55. Total real estate from　22　A.
Whatever we did, we did working
23　schedule A/B".　23　with the lawyers.
24　Q.
Thank you. And it reads zero?　24　Q.
I'm going to ask you to turn to
25　A.
Correct.　25　Page 3 of the document.
Page 94　Page 96

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
What analysis, if any, did　2　MR. AULET: Just for
3　Verdolino and Lowey do to prepare this line　3　clarification, every time you're
4　item?　4　refer to Page 3, you're referring to
5　A.
I worked with the lawyers.　5　the top numbers?
6　Q.
Did you do any independent　6　MS. ARONSSON: Yes. I'm
7　investigation with respect to the line item　7　referring to the docket numbering at
8　1A?　8　the top. Page 3 of 23.
9　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　9　Q.
Starting with Part 1 here, did
10　A.
No.　10　Verdolino and Lowey perform any work in
11　Q.
Turning to 1B, this reads,　11　connection with this line item?
12　"total personal property from Schedule A/B"　12　A.
If we did, we did with counsel.
13　and I think this refers us to Line 36?　13　Q.
In Part 2, Item 3 and 4
14　A.
I would have thought it related　14　referring to cars, vans, trucks, etcetera,
15　to Line 62.　15　watercraft, aircraft, did Verdolino and
16　Q.
It does and then 62. Sorry --　16　Lowey perform any work in connection with
17　so 62 refers back to 56 to 61. Do you see　17　this section?
18　that, that's on Page 7 of the PDF?　18　A.
All with counsel.
19　A.
Lines 56 to 61, is that what　19　Q.
So it's fair to say, when you
20　you're referring to?　20　say you performed work with counsel, you
21　Q.
That's right.　21　didn't perform any independent
22　A.
Yep.　22　investigation?

24　Q.
The only item populated in 55
to 61 is Item 58?　23
24　A.
Correct.
Q.
Part 3, Items 6 through Items
25　A.
Correct.　25　15 refer to personal and household items,

Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

25 (Pages 94 - 97)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　is that right?　2　EXAMINATION BY
3　A.
Yes.　3　MR. HARBACH:
4　Q.
Without walking through each of　4　Q.
For the record, this is David
5　these, did you perform -- did Verdolino and　5　Harbach at O'Melveny, also representing
6　Lowey perform any work in connection with　6　Pax. I just have a few questions. Sir, I
7　Items 6 through 14?　7　believe you mentioned earlier that you or
8　A.
Nothing -- not with the　8　Verdolino and Lowey were involved in
9　attorneys.　9　helping to prepare the notes for the
10　Q.
Just to be clear about your　10　schedules that were filed? Have I got that
11　role, were you provided information from　11　right?
12　counsel and you were responsible for　12　A.
The specific part of the
13　drafting this form or did you rely on　13　notes --
14　counsel to draft this form?　14　Q.
Yes, sir. The specific notes.
15　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　15　A.
Not the general --
16　A.
We keypunched into the forms　16　Q.
Understood.
17　after consultation obviously.　17　A.
Yes, I worked with counsel on
18　Q.
Did you do anything besides　18　that.
19　keypunch into the form?　19　Q.
The specific notes are --
20　A.
We discussed matters with the　20　appear at Document Number 77 on the docket
21　attorneys.　21　and I don't have an extra copy for you but
22　Q.
I'm asking in connection with　22　I hope you'll agree that it won't be
23　filing the schedule and the SOFA, when you　23　necessary. When it comes to questions
24　say you communicated with the attorneys,　24　about things like electronics and household
25　you're talking about Brown Rudnick?　25　goods and furnishings, which my colleague
Page 98　Page 100

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　A.
And Melissa Francis and Aaron　2　was just asking you about, the specific
3　Mitchell.　3　notes state, for example, "numerous items
4　Q.
Did you communicate or did　4　fitting the personal and household
5　Verdolino and Lowey communicate with anyone　5　definition are located at the residence and
6　else besides the attorneys at Brown　6　the apartment" and then it goes onto say,
7　Rudnick, Melissa Francis and Aaron　7　"except as otherwise set forth herein, the
8　Mitchell?　8　debtor has no legal title to the contents
9　A.
No.　9　of either the residence or the apartment
10　Q.
Were you provided any facts or　10　and no court has made any determination
11　information from any party when punching in　11　that the debtor has any other interests in
12　these line items?　12　any such items". My question for you is
13　A.
We were informed by facts, lots　13　was Verdolino and Lowey at all involved in
14　of them from the attorneys and lots of　14　making the assessment of whether any of
15　discussion.　15　these household items belonged to the
16　Q.
Was it -- scratch that. The　16　debtor?

18　information you received, was it oral?
A.
Some was oral and some was in　17
18　MR. AULET: I just lodge an
objection to asking him about a
19　e-mails, I believe, from counsel.　19　document that you're not showing him.
20　MR. HARBACH: Do you mind if I　20　You can answer if you can.
21　ask a couple questions?　21　A.
To be clear, are you asking me
22　MS. ARONSSON: Sure.　22　if I investigated whether the spatulas and
23　MR. AULET: I don't have any　23　the pots and pans existed and who bought
24　objection.　24　them and how much they were and are they at
25　MR. HARBACH: Thank you.
Page 99　25　the house?

26 (Pages 98 - 101)

Page 102 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. All I'm asking is whether Verdolino and Lowey had any role in making the judgment call over whether the household items at the residence or the apartment belonged to Mr. Kwok or was that something that was left to the lawyers? 8 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 9 A. We did no investigation. I had no personal knowledge not told to me by Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Brown Rudnick about the ownership of those. So it wasn't my decision and I didn't investigate but I certainly was party to the conversations regarding that. 16 Q. During those conversations, if one of those people, a lawyer at Brown Rudnick or Melissa -- whose last name I forget -- 20 A. Francis. 21 Q. Francis, thank you. Represented to you that those items do not belong to Mr. Kwok, you just accepted that at face value? 25 A. Correct. Page 103 1 C. JALBERT 2 MR. HARBACH: Okay, thank you. 3 Thank you, Laura. CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. ARONSSON: 6 Q. This is Laura Aronsson from O'Melveny. Just turning back to what we were talking about in connection with the schedule. I think David covered this. So when drafting this, how did you decide whether an item like the iPhone referenced in Line Item 7 or the clothes referenced in Line Item 11 or the family dog referenced Item 13 belonged to Kwok as opposed to another person or entity? 16 A. I was informed by either Melissa Francis or Aaron Mitchell or they informed Brown Rudnick and Brown Rudnick informed us. 20 Q. Is it fair to say that that chain of events that you just described applies to all of the items identified in this schedule? 24 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 25 A. I don't know -- we better go Page 104 1 C. JALBERT item by item if that's what you want to do. I don't know what you're referring to. You know, you got specific lines you're talking about? 6 Q. Sure, that's fair. So in connection with any of the assets identified in the schedule as belonging to Mr. Kwok, you solely relied on the chain of events you previously described, Brown Rudnick received information from Melissa Francis and Aaron Mitchell? 13 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 14 A. No, that's not what I said. I said we heard directly from Melissa Francis or Aaron Mitchell or they informed Brown Rudnick and Brown Rudnick told me that they -- what the answer was from them. There was no one way of communicating. It was fluid situation. We had a very short time to do them but it was not one way or the other. It was, as I said, either and many times the e-mails were with all the attorneys on the e-mail or it was a phone call with a lot of parties and I don't Page 105 1 C. JALBERT remember all of the parties but the source of the information was for us, first, Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis in no particular order. Now I don't remember who knew more about what than the other or if they passed information onto Brown Rudnick, who then passed it onto us. Obviously, after they did whatever legal analysis they wanted to do. 11 Q. In preparing these documents, did you ask for any information from Brown Rudnick or Aaron Mitchell or Melissa Francis that you were not given? 15 A. I don't remember asking a question they didn't answer but I didn't investigate anything. 18 Q. I want to turn to Page 16 of this document. So at the bottom of the page, to direct your attention there, Part 2 reads, "estimate your ongoing monthly expenses". Were you involved in drafting this section? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. What was your role -- or

27 (Pages 102 - 105)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　scratch that. What was Verdolino and　2　operating report is a different report and
3　Lowey's role in connection with this　3　that's a completely different question than
4　section?　4　what's on here.
5　A.
We had discussions with the　5　Q.
Can you explain to me the
6　legal team, which is Brown Rudnick team　6　difference?
7　plus Aaron Mitchell, plus Melissa Francis,　7　A.
And I don't remember what
8　probably more than one time, probably　8　question it is, is it like 4 or 5 or 6E or
9　orally, probably in e-mail and it was a　9　whatever it is, the request is to report
10　discussion.　10　the expenses paid by others on the debtor's
11　Q.
Turning to the next page, the　11　behalf. That's not what this asks. So in
12　estimated monthly operating expenses reads　12　the schedule, we listed some funds and we
13　zero. Is that fair?　13　will, going forward, be listing and
14　A.
Yes.　14　reporting, as required by the MOR, the
15　Q.
Did you anticipate the debtor's　15　expenses paid by others on behalf of the
16　monthly operating expenses to remain zero　16　debtor which is again different from what
17　after this point?　17　this asks.
18　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　18　Q.
Focusing on what this asks,
19　A.
It certainly was discussed with　19　it's your understanding that the debtor's
20　the attorneys. I don't think it's a　20　ongoing monthly expenses is zero?
21　secret. There was lots of discussion　21　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
22　yesterday. So my expectation is yes, as to　22　A.
The debtor's payment of the
23　his expenses, his payment of his expenses　23　ongoing expenses is zero.
24　is going to remain I think zero.　24　Q.
You did no investigation into
25　Q.
I think you said his -- his　25　whether that is correct?

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　expenses. In your view, what does his　2　A.
Correct.
3　expenses cover?　3　Q.
Turning just to the Excel
4　A.
There's a whole list of them　4　sheets at the end of this document,
5　here. You want to go down them? It looks　5　starting just broadly, was Verdolino and
6　like about 30 of them. Real estate taxes,　6　Lowey involved in preparing these
7　property and homeowners and renters'　7　documents?
8　insurance, home maintenance repair and　8　A.
Well, we were certainly
9　upkeep expenses, home ownership association　9　involved with others, yes.
10　and condo dues. Don't even know if those　10　Q.
What -- generally, what work
11　are applicable. Electricity, heat and　11　did Verdolino and Lowey do in connection
12　natural gas. Want me to keep going?　12　with these documents?
13　Q.
So we can just agree that Items　13　A.
Reviewed them for
14　4 through 21 would include monthly　14　reasonableness, assisted in putting them in
15　expenses?　15　a form that would normally be seen in a
16　A.
Again, as it relates to him　16　SOFA and schedule. I think some of this
17　paying them, I would agree. My　17　was uploaded into the actual Schedule F
18　understanding is they're going to remain　18　because I think Schedule F -- well, maybe
19　zero.　19　it doesn't. I don't know. I don't
20　Q.
So this -- the analysis　20　remember whether this was uploaded or not
21　contained in this document is separate from　21　but it could be. So that -- so it starts
22　the monthly operating report, the reports　22　with D. So all of these, we worked with
23　that you, Verdolino, draft in connection　23　the attorneys and that's again, all three,
24　with this case?　24　the Brown Rudnick team, Aaron Mitchell and
25　A.
Correct, because the monthly
Page 107　25　Melissa Francis.

28 (Pages 106 - 109)

Page 110 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. I think you said the phrase reviewed for reasonableness. What do you mean by that? 5 A. Well, if we had anything to compare information to, we compared it or -- or if we had a question, we asked a question of the lawyers. I don't remember off hand what those were. 10 Q. Can you think generally of any issues that you investigated in connection with preparing these? 13 A. I'm sure on a couple of them, we wanted the make sure that -- that there wasn't a missing digit or an extra digit so I'm sure someone from my team walked through with someone, probably either Melissa or Aaron, just as a double check that it's what -- what the number on the form was the number that they intended. There wasn't, in there someplace, a human error. 23 Q. Can you think of anything else specific that you investigated? 25 A. We did not investigate. Page 111 1 C. JALBERT 2 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 3 Reporter is going to hand you what's 4 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 6. 5 This is a document filed in this case 6 as Docket 77. 7 (Whereupon, Global Notes was 8 marked as Jalbert Exhibit 6 for 9 identification as of this date by the 10 Reporter.) 11 Q. Do you recognize this document? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. What is it? 14 A. The Global Notes and Statements of Limitations Methodology and Disclaimers Regarding the Debtor's Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs and the debtor is Ho Wan Kwok. 19 Q. And this is a specific line item that Verdolino and Lowey's proposed retention relates to? 22 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 23 A. Can I go back and take a look? I don't know what the global notes are listed or not but these are part and parcel Page 112 1 C. JALBERT to the SOFA's and schedules. So it would be part of the first bullet, "assistance with preparation of the statement of financial affairs and schedules and all support thereto and any amendments, if necessary". 8 Q. What was Verdolino and Lowey's role in preparing this document? 10 A. Well, we certainly assisted in drafting. We assisted in reviewing, particularly the specific notes but there was -- there was a lot of back and forth and a lot of work between the Brown Rudnick law firm, Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Verdolino and Lowey, both -- all three at Verdolino and Lowey, Matt Flynn, Mary Jo Schindler and myself. 19 Q. Just to understand, what specific work did Verdolino and Lowey do in connection with preparing this document? 22 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 23 A. Well, like I said, we had numerous e-mails, we reviewed everything, we made comments. We might have drafted a Page 113 1 C. JALBERT paragraph here or a paragraph there. I think we assisted the group in making sure the references, amongst the notes and amongst the questions and the SOFA's and amongst the schedules to the extent they were interrelated, that the references were appropriate. We made sure that the writings were the facts as we knew them. Didn't investigate but we had lots of discussions and we made sure that what was represented here was our memories. 13 Q. Thank you. Turning to Page 4, Question 1 in the middle of the page, asks "do you own or have any legal or equitable interest in any residence, building, land or similar property". The answer in Item 1, below it, reads, "the debtor has use and occupancy of real estate located at 373 Taconic Road, Greenwich, Connecticut". Do you have any understanding as to why the use and occupancy of certain real estate is relevant to this filing? 24 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 25 A. Well, I'm not a lawyer but

29 (Pages 110 - 113)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Schedule A is I thought real property that　2　Haven on Wednesday for the 341 meeting but
3　was owned by the debtor. I would have to　3　I don't know -- I know it's a valuable car.
4　go back and confirm that but real estate.　4　I don't know what the name is and I don't
5　So it would be -- he's alive. He resides　5　know who owns them. I know the debtor --
6　in a residence and I'm presuming this is　6　just as this says, the debtor has use.
7　the appropriate legal description of the　7　Q.
So beyond what this says here
8　facts and circumstances of his living in　8　and your previous answer, do you have
9　that residence.　9　anymore information about the vehicles that
10　Q.
Again, no independent　10　the debtor has use of?
11　investigations into this?　11　A.
No.
12　A.
Correct.　12　Q.
Did you witness the debtor
13　Q.
Did you perform any evaluation　13　using any luxury vehicles at any time?
14　of the residences listed in Question 1?　14　A.
I don't know what you mean by
15　A.
No.　15　using but he got out of one in New Haven on
16　Q.
The second bullet refers to an　16　Wednesday.
17　apartment in the Sherry Netherland Hotel?　17　Q.
Do you know what kind of car it
18　A.
Yes.　18　was?
19　Q.
Did you draft this section?　19　A.
I don't remember.
20　A.
Did I draft it? I doubt it. I　20　Q.
Is this -- strike that. Is --
21　might have reviewed it. I might have had　21　is the answer to Question 3 relevant to the
22　input in something but this is not my　22　preparation of monthly operating reports?
23　language.　23　A.
Probably, yes.
24　Q.
Are you aware that the entity　24　Q.
Why?
25　holding the legal title to the Sherry　25　A.
Because I imagine there's a

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Netherland apartment is in bankruptcy?　2　cost associated with those vehicles being
3　A.
Well, I know there's a Chapter　3　provided for his use and again, I don't
4　11 going on. Exactly what's in Chapter 11　4　remember exactly what the question is, 4, 5
5　and who owns what, I have not confirmed or　5　or 6, like E, where the rules say to report
6　made an investigation but generally　6　expenses made by third-parties on behalf of
7　speaking, I understand that that apartment　7　the debtor. Well, I'm thinking the use of
8　is somehow in Chapter 11 in New York.　8　the vehicles -- you know, I don't know if
9　Q.
Any involvement in those　9　there's a car payment on it, gasoline,
10　proceedings in New York?　10　insurance, I don't know but something might
11　A.
No.　11　be in there.
12　Q.
Turning to the next page,　12　Q.
What about the purchase of the
13　Question 3 asks for interests, broadly　13　vehicle itself whenever it was purchased,
14　speaking, in any vehicles. The response　14　is that relevant to the monthly operating
15　reads that "the debtor has use of　15　report?
16　automobiles including luxury automobiles　16　A.
Well, monthly operating reports
17　and motorcycles". Did you do any　17　are usually a disbursement in a particular
18　investigation into this analysis?　18　time period. I imagine if they've bought
19　A.
No.　19　one of those cars during the pendency,
20　Q.
Do you have any understanding　20　maybe it shows up. I don't know. On the
21　of what vehicles the debtor uses?　21　other hand, you could make an argument that
22　A.
Only from my memory, the -- he　22　the use of the vehicle is not the same
23　has access to a luxury vehicle and I think　23　thing as buying the vehicle because maybe

25　there's a vehicle that his security travels
in. As a matter of fact, they were in New　24
25　other people use it too. So you would have
to find a way of allocating the cost.

30 (Pages 114 - 117)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
Does that answer apply to the　2　A.
No.
3　Question 1 about residences as well?　3　Q.
Turning to Page 8, Question 26
4　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　4　asks for patents, copyrights, trademarks,
5　A.
The debtor resides in a　5　etcetera. The answer refers to
6　particular residence. They're -- the only　6　unregistered copyrights and other
7　people there that I know of, except for a　7　intellectual property interest in music and
8　maid that comes in and security and　8　videos posted to various platforms. What
9　possibly visits from family. So I imagine　9　is this referring to?
10　the cost of the residence would be on that　10　A.
The whole thing?
11　so -- that monthly operating report in some　11　Q.
Yes.
12　amount and I think I -- I was a proponent　12　A.
The Question 26 refers to
13　of 50 percent of that cost would be on　13　various intellectual property patents,
14　behalf of the debtor because the spouse　14　copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and
15　lives there too and I didn't count the kids　15　intellectual property. The debtor -- I'll
16　because they only came to visit the debtor.　16　just read it to you. "The debtor has
17　So I kind of ascribed more to the mother　17　possible unregistered copyrights and other
18　and father and split the cost but there's　18　intellectual property interest in music and
19　no home purchase in there. There's no --　19　videos posted to various digital and media
20　again, it's what you pay in that current　20　platforms such as YouTube, GTV, Twitter"
21　month. So I'm assuming they're telling --　21　and -- I don't even know, GETTR, whatever
22　we're going to be disclosing what is paid　22　that is. "The debtor ascribes no value to
23　in that particular time frame on behalf of　23　his social media assets and has made no
24　the debtor on the various categories, the　24　attempts to monetize his social media
25　vehicles, the security, the home --　25　presence".
Page 118　Page 120
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　Q.
Thank you --　2　Q.
Beyond what's written on the
3　A.
Food.　3　page, do you have any understanding of what
4　Q.
Thank you. Question 4 refers　4　this refers to?
5　to watercraft, aircraft, motor homes and　5　A.
No.
6　the answer references previous access to　6　Q.
The second sentence notes that

8　the use of a yacht named the Lady May. Do
you have any -- beyond what's written on　7
8　the debtor ascribes no value to these
items, do you see that?
9　this page, do you have any understanding of　9　A.
Yep.
10　Mr. Kwok's interest the Lady May?　10　Q.
You performed no valuation of
11　A.
Nothing that's not printed on　11　these items in connection with your work?
12　this page.　12　A.
Correct.
13　Q.
Did you do any independent　13　Q.
Do you know if any valuation
14　investigation into this?　14　was performed?
15　A.
No.　15　A.
None to my knowledge.
16　Q.
Items 6 and 7, household goods　16　Q.
Question 31 asks for interest
17　and electronics. I think we covered that　17　and insurance policies. The answer refers
18　previously. In connection with Items 6,　18　to his spouse's health insurance policy
19　household goods through Questions 17 on　19　which has no cash value. Do you see that?
20　this page -- so just for clarity, it's　20　A.
Yes.
21　Questions 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 17. Did you do　21　Q.
Is it standard practice that a
22　any investigation as to what -- as to　22　health insurance policy has no cash value?
23　whether the items referenced in here belong　23　A.
I've never seen a situation
24　to Mr. Kwok versus some other third-party　24　where a health insurance policy has a cash
25　or entity?
Page 119　25　value except for to the beneficiary of --

31 (Pages 118 - 121)

Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

23　C. JALBERT
if you have a health insurance plan, it has
a lot of value to you when you go to the
hospital and it pays the bills for you.
There's not an independent value to a
third-party that you can sell.
Q.
Do you have any knowledge about
the health insurance policy that the debtor
has currently?
A.
No.
Q.
Question 53 asks for property
of the kind not listed and the answer
refers to his membership at Mar-a-Lago Club
in Palm Beach. Is this the type of thing
that Verdolino and Lowey would include on a
monthly operating report if Mr. Kwok, the
debtor, used the membership?
MR. AULET: Objection to form.
A.
I would have to use conjecture.
Q.
Go ahead.
A.
Well, the first monthly
operating report was filed in February. I
don't know whether he went down there or　1

23　C. JALBERT
Rudnick, Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis
to inform you of how he might benefit from
things like his like his Mar-a-Lago
membership in connection with drafting the
monthly operating report?
A.
I certainly would listen to
counsel on that for sure.
Q.
But Verdolino and Lowey
wouldn't endeavor to seek out information
about these monthly expenses --
A.
Well, we're going to seek out
and we're going to point to the question
and we're going to ask for information
that's responsive to that. I don't have
access to the information. We don't
investigate. I'm not going to keep track
of where the debtor goes or doesn't go. So
someone would need to tell us the
information. We would then review it but
I -- I think that Mar-a-Lago thing, at
least for the foreseeable future, is not an
issue but if it becomes an issue, someone

25　not. I don't know if he went down there in
March. If he -- if he went there, I　24
25　will tell me.
Q.
Turning to Page 11, Schedule I,

25　Page 122
C. JALBERT
imagine there would be travel expenses. I
don't know whether there would be a fee for
the golf and maybe he had lunch. So I
imagine if he physically went there and
used it, there would be -- there might be
-- there would be something in the monthly
operating report but if he stays where I
think he's going to stay, in Greenwich
where he's safe, it's not going to be
relevant.
Q.
What is your basis for thinking
he's going to stay where he is in
Greenwich?
A.
I listened to the 341 meeting
yesterday -- excuse me, Wednesday.
Q.
Besides the knowledge gathered
from that hearing on Wednesday, the 341
hearing, do you have any independent
knowledge about the debtor's expected
travel or location?
A.
I have no knowledge whatsoever
of where he's going to be at any point in
time.
Q.
Would you rely on Brown
Page 123　1

25　Page 124
C. JALBERT
the second to last sentence here and it's
that "the debtor plans to amend Form 122B
filed on February 15th, 2022 in which
debtor erroneously claimed monthly income
of \$19,488". Do you see that?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Do you know what that refers
to?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What is it?
A.
The debtor inadvertently or
accidently -- I don't know what the term
would be -- erroneously filed a Form 122B.
It included \$19,488 dollars which met --
the form met for the monthly income, I
think the review by the lawyers was that's
incorrect and so they -- the debtor filed
an amended 122B or at least intended to --
I don't know if it's done yet or not --
excluding that income.
Q.
Did Verdolino and Lowey perform
any work in connection with that erroneous
inclusion?
A.
I'm sure anything we did was in

32 (Pages 122 - 125)

Page 126 1 C. JALBERT 2 consultation with the lawyers. 3 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 4 Sorry. 5 Q. Turning to Page 13, Question 16 6 refers to a retainer of 500 thousand for 7 Brown Rudnick and then refers to one 8 million dollars from Lamp Capital. Do you 9 have any knowledge of that transaction 10 outside of what's written on the page? 11 A. I think there was discussion of 12 it yesterday -- excuse me, on Wednesday at 13 the 341 meeting and I think I saw a draft 14 of Brown Rudnick's retention papers -- I 15 think I did where I thought something was 16 mentioned in there. 17 Q. Do you recall what that was? 18 A. No. Something along the lines 19 of what's right here. 20 Q. Do you know what Lamp Capital 21 LLC is? 22 A. An entity owned by someone that 23 is not the debtor. 24 Q. Do you have any idea who it is 25 owned by? Page 127 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. Only a guess. 3 Q. Can you tell me -- I guess you 4 don't need to speculate. Do you have any 5 information that -- about what informs your 6 guess? 7 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 8 A. My memory was there was a lot 9 being talked about but my memory was 10 something was said during the 341 meeting 11 but it is very -- I was very back of the 12 room, as you know, and it was very hard for 13 me to hear the English version from the 14 interpreter. So I can't be sure but I 15 thought I heard something that discussed 16 who owned Lamp. 17 Q. Outside of what you heard at 18 the 341 hearing and this other document 19 that you remember seeing, do you have any 20 knowledge about Lamp or its operations? 21 A. No. 22 Q. The next item, Question 18 23 refers to a litigation funding agreement 24 dated November 8th, 2021. Have you seen 25 that agreement? Page 128 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. There are actually five of them 3 I think. They're listed in Schedule D. I 4 don't recall whether I actually saw them or 5 not. I think they were briefly described 6 to me at a minimum by lawyers. 7 Q. Any independent knowledge of 8 those agreements besides -- 9 A. No. 10 Q. Did Verdolino and Lowey do any 11 other investigation in connection with the 12 assets we've talked about that we didn't 13 cover? 14 A. No. 15 Q. Those five litigation 16 agreements we talked about -- 17 A. The litigation funding 18 agreements? 19 Q. Yes. Thank you. Have you seen 20 them before? 21 A. Not to my knowledge. 22 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 23 Reporter is going to hand you what's 24 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 7. 25 This is a document produced in this Page 129 1 C. JALBERT 2 matter with the Bates stamp Kwok 3 00001752. 4 MR. AULET: Just for the 5 record, it's two separate documents 6 so we should make sure -- 7 MS. ARONSSON: I'll represent 8 that this is a family of documents, 9 an e-mail and an attachment. 10 (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was 11 marked as Jalbert Exhibit 7 for 12 identification as of this date by the 13 Reporter.) 14 Q. Mr. Jalbert, I understand 15 you're not on this e-mail. I'm just going 16 to ask you some basic questions about it. 17 This is an e-mail between a redacted 18 person, Aaron Mitchell, Matt Flynn and 19 Melissa Francis. Matt Flynn is your 20 colleague. We've talked about the other 21 folks. The attachment is a summary of 22 living expenses from the period February 23 15th to 28th. First, I'm going to ask who 24 is this e-mail from? 25 MR. AULET: And I will object

33 (Pages 126 - 129)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　and direct him the Witness to answer　2　Q.
Is this the monthly operating
3　for the same reasons that we　3　report filing that we've been discussing
4　discussed previously on the record.　4　that you've been involved in preparing?
5　MS. ARONSSON: And we'll　5　A.
Looks like it, yes.
6　continue to dispute the redaction　6　Q.
Turning to the filing 120-1,
7　here.　7　the separate loose page, these line items
8　Q.
Turning to the attachment, this　8　here, can you just explain broadly what
9　summary of expenses, this was provided by a　9　they are at the bottom? What does the
10　person -- the unknown person in the top　10　total reflect?
11　e-mail, is that right?　11　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
12　A.
Yes.　12　A.
You're referring to the
13　Q.
Is it fair to say that this is　13　\$109,827.12?
14　the starting point for Verdolino's monthly　14　Q.
Yes.
15　operating report draft?　15　A.
I'm trying to see who made the
16　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　16　payments but inadvertently, the family, on
17　A.
As to the one particular　17　behalf of the debtor, on February 16th, the
18　question, yes.　18　day after the filing, made these two
19　Q.
Sorry. What do you mean?　19　payments on pre-petition amounts. So this
20　A.
This answers one question on　20　was, in an abundance of caution, in the 161
21　the monthly operating report and again, I　21　thousand dollars that was shown on Part 1,
22　don't remember off hand exactly which one　22　Number E, this 109 thousand dollars is
23　it is but something, 4, 5, 6E. The funds　23　included in the 161,323. So we were -- the
24　paid by third-parties on behalf of the　24　lawyers felt it was important to supplement
25　debtor. This is the first pass.　25　the monthly operating report with that
Page 130　Page 132

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　MS. ARONSSON: McKenzie, Tab　2　information that this was really a
3　19.　3　pre-petition payment paid post-petition.
4　THE WITNESS: Are you done?　4　Q.
Understood. Thank you. So the
5　MS. ARONSSON: No.　5　total expenses \$161,323 here, if we
6　MR. AULET: Should we have the　6　subtract from that, the total inadvertent
7　back up marked as a separate exhibit　7　payments is \$109,827. What does that
8　or --　8　amount reflect?
9　MS. ARONSSON: I typically mark　9　A.
The amount of the payments that
10　them as one.　10　weren't these two payments that were made
11　MR. AULET: Okay.　11　in the period from February 15th to
12　THE WITNESS: We'll put them　12　February 28th by third-parties on behalf of
13　together again and eliminate the blue　13　the debtor.
14　sheet.　14　Q.
Would that be reflected in the
15　(Whereupon, E-mail Chain was　15　final version of the living expenses sheet
16　marked as Jalbert Exhibit 8 for　16　that we looked at on Exhibit Number 7?
17　identification as of this date by the　17　A.
Yes.
18　Reporter.)　18　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
19　Q.
The Court Reporter is going to　19　Q.
Is anything else included in
20　hand you what's being marked as Jalbert　20　that number, to your knowledge?
21　Exhibit 8.　21　A.
Well, inadvertently, yes. We
22　A.
Have you given it to her yet?　22　found out that whoever created the form on
23　MS. ARONSSON: This is a　23　the security total dollars, whatever the

25　document filed in this case as Docket
120 and document 120-1.　24
25　final total dollars were, there was a
payment made February 10 pre-petition that

34 (Pages 130 - 133)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　was inadvertently included in the payments　2　that the categories were properly described
3　from February 15th to 28th. So that will　3　because this is not nearly final. This --
4　be corrected on the next operating report.　4　there were some errors and we also worked
5　Q.
So included in this operating　5　with counsel and others in trying to figure
6　report is the two inadvertent payments to　6　out what the percentage of the monies that
7　the law firms identified on Exhibit 8?　7　were paid in Column C multiplied by a
8　A.
Yes, correct.　8　distribution percentage to arrive at the
9　Q.
The monthly operating living　9　total. We worked with the preparer to make
10　expenses that we've talked about and then　10　sure that the descriptions on the schedule
11　this other payment that you said would be　11　were accurate. We tried to confirm the
12　corrected, is that right?　12　numbers were accurate. We couldn't get the
13　A.
It's included in the 161.　13　information in time to be able to do that
14　We'll be pulling that out when we do the　14　but then we looked at the distribution
15　March -- so the way the form works usually　15　percentages using our judgment in working
16　is you have payments paid currently and　16　with the lawyers.
17　cumulative. We will take that small amount　17　Q.
Looking at this draft, living

19　of money out of the cumulative so as to
have the correct number going forward.　18
19　expense chart in Exhibit 7, there are seven
line items. Is that right?
20　Q.
So is it fair to say that　20　A.
Yes.
21　Verdolino and Lowey's role in connection　21　Q.
Is it fair to say that
22　with these inadvertent payments was to kind　22　Verdolino and Lowey crosschecked the names
23　of double check the amounts included in the　23　of the categories to ensure that they
24　monthly operating report?　24　accurately depicted the expenses contained
25　A.
We tried but given the timing　25　in those line items?
Page 134　Page 136

2　C. JALBERT
of when the information became available　1
2　C. JALBERT
A.
We did the best we could, yes.
3　and when the form had to be filed, there　3　Q.
What more information would
4　was a miscommunication with the preparer of　4　have been helpful to help you get to that
5　the schedule that will be rectified.　5　determination?
6　Q.
Who's the preparer of the　6　A.
If we could have seen what
7　schedule?　7　the -- what the actual payees and
8　A.
I can't tell you.　8　disbursements were, it probably would have
9　Q.
What schedule are you referring　9　helped us with the categorization.
10　to, this document here, the monthly　10　Q.
But you didn't receive that?
11　operating report, Exhibit 8?　11　A.
Not -- not at that time, no.
12　A.
This thing (indicating).　12　Q.
Is the extent of information
13　Q.
So the number 161 here refers　13　you received regarding these line items
14　to this spreadsheet in Exhibit 7 as　14　included in this chart here?
15　reflected with your edits, with Verdolino　15　A.
As of the date that we made
16　and Lowey's edits?　16　available all the -- I'm sure there's an
17　A.
The 161 is the sum of the final　17　updated version because this doesn't tie to
18　number from Exhibit 8 plus the 109.　18　here (indicating) and then we -- long after
19　Q.
What work did Verdolino and　19　we produced the information for -- for this
20　Lowey do in connection with getting to the　20　deposition, there's been continuing ongoing
21　final numbers?　21　discussions because we're getting ready to
22　A.
We worked with counsel and　22　file -- excuse me, the March MOR in April.
23　Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis trying　23　Q.
We'll turn to the -- what I

25　to review -- we didn't have details but we
were trying to ask questions and make sure　24
25　think is the final version but we talked
about the categories, the amount you said

35 (Pages 134 - 137)

Page 138 1 C. JALBERT 2 that, at the time of this filing, you did 3 not have information to be able to verify 4 the amounts attributed to each category. 5 Is that right? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. What information would have 8 been helpful for you to cross check those 9 amounts? 10 A. Like I said, the name of the 11 payee, a description of what the service 12 was and the amount of the funds. 13 Q. The percentage distribution, 14 what does that mean? 15 A. The -- so for instance, 16 security was, in this sheet, \$43,655.44. 17 The drafter of this and anyone that he 18 consulted with or she consulted with was 40 19 percent. Amongst talking with our team and 20 with the lawyer team, we thought that that 21 probably should be one hundred percent 22 because the only reason -- the security is 23 entirely related to Mr. Kwok and his 24 safety. There wouldn't be security if the 25 wife and the kids or others at the Page 139 1 C. JALBERT 2 compound, if it weren't for Mr. Kwok. So 3 we proposed changing and I think that did 4 get changed to a hundred percent. 5 Q. In revising these percentage 6 distributions, did you rely entirely on 7 information received from Brown Rudnick and 8 Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis and this 9 undisclosed person? 10 A. The first pass was the 11 undisclosed person. After we got this 12 information from the undisclosed person, 13 most of the discussion was between our 14 firm, my firm and the lawyer -- lawyers. 15 How long is this is going to go? Because 16 if it's going to go a bit, now I would like 17 to use the restroom. I'll be fast. 18 MS. ARONSSON: We can take a 19 break. We'll go off the record. 20 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 21 1:22 p.m. We're off the record. 22 (Whereupon, a short recess was 23 taken and upon resuming, E-mail Chain 24 was marked as Jalbert Exhibit 9 for 25 identification as of this date by the Page 140 1 C. JALBERT 2 Reporter.) 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 4 1:28 p.m. We're back on the record. 5 You may proceed. 6 Q. I think you have received 7 what's been marked as Jalbert Exhibit 9. 8 This bears the Bates Kwok 00001684. Do you 9 recognize this document? 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. Turning to the attachment, to 12 your knowledge, is this the final version 13 of the living expenses for the period 14 February 15th to February 28th? 15 A. I think it is. 16 Q. I'll represent, if you add 17 \$51,495.67 plus the 109 thousand -- 18 A. 161. 19 Q. So we're on the same page, this 20 is the final version? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. Does this final version reflect 23 Verdolino and Lowey's edits on the initial 24 draft provided by an unknown person? 25 A. Well, it's certainly -- as you Page 141 1 C. JALBERT 2 can see from the e-mail, we made 3 suggestions but counsel clearly reviewed 4 and assisted with the final decision and 5 I'm sure they also checked with the debtor. 6 I did not. 7 Q. So just walking through these 8 five suggestions, why did you increase the 9 meals to 50 percent or why did you 10 recommend increasing the meals to 50 11 percent? 12 A. Because there's a husband and a 13 wife and one hundred percent divided by two 14 is by 50 percent. 15 Q. Do you have any understanding 16 as to why the draft had allocated the 17 numbers in the way it had in Exhibit 7? 18 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 19 A. So I think what the creator of 20 the initial -- my memory is the creator of 21 the initial document took into 22 consideration that occasionally, the 23 debtor's daughter and maybe one or two 24 other people occasionally showed up and so 25 I think they ascribed some of the cost to 85

36 (Pages 138 - 141)

Page 142 1 C. JALBERT those people but our feeling in consultation with the attorneys was that the only reason those people are there is they're coming to visit the debtor and that's why they incurred the cost. So I thought they should put 50 percent to the husband and 50 percent to the wife and that's how we got the 50 percent. 10 Q. Besides what you just described to me, do you have anymore reasons for suggesting the increase of 50 percent? 13 A. Not that I can remember. 14 Q. Item 2 is security is increased to 100 and looking at the draft in Exhibit 7, it was 40 percent. What was your reasoning for suggesting to increase the security to 100? 19 A. Again, the only reason there's any security at all is all about the debtor. So in an abundance of caution, we're ascribing that cost, one hundred percent of that cost to the debtor. The wife likely would not have security concerns if she were not married to Page 143 1 C. JALBERT Mr. Kwok and when the daughter or others sometimes travel, they need security as well. So for whatever reason, their security is all related to the debtor. We suggested going to a hundred percent. It was discussed among the group and everyone agreed to the 100 percent. 9 Q. What is the basis for your assumption that the primary reason security has been retained is directly related to the debtor? 13 A. Discussion with Melissa Francis and Aaron Mitchell who confirmed in several phone calls that the debtor is harassed and threatened and otherwise scared for his existence and to the extent the -- I'm told to the extent the family is scared, they're scared because of their relationship to their father. 21 Q. Is there any other reasoning that you haven't articulated about the basis for your increasing security to one hundred? 25 A. Well, it is very conservative Page 144 1 C. JALBERT to ascribe the one hundred percent of the cost to the debtor is -- means that all that costs -- we could have left it at 30 percent and probably made it a callable argument of why it could be 30 percent. We wanted to go with -- I think part of the final reasoning amongst the group was that it's conservative to report all of it on the debtor's behalf because of his safety concerns is -- that was the reasoning. 12 Q. Thank you. Item 3 is utilities increased to 50 percent and I'll represent Exhibit 7 has it at 30 percent and you ascribe the same explanation as the meals. Is there any other -- 17 A. No, it's the same -- it's the same -- it's the same theme at different percentages for most of these. 20 Q. Item 4 refers to housekeeping. I believe Verdolino and Lowey recommended changing repair and maintenance to housekeeping? 24 A. Well, as it turns out, once we were able to speak with someone and get Page 145 1 C. JALBERT some information that's behind the numbers, we found out that that's the cost of the maid for those 15 days or maids or maid service or cleaning service and not maintenance. So it's just a matter of calling it what it was. Had we seen detail, we would have understood that on a more timely basis. 10 Q. Your reasoning for increasing the allocation from 30 to 50 percent, is it fair to say it's the same reasoning behind -- 14 A. It's a husband and a wife. You know, any other cleaning they do on behalf of anybody else, the only reason they're there is because the Kwok's are there. The debtor and his spouse. 19 Q. You note at the bottom of the page, "in our opinion, it's best to be more conservative". That's another reasoning behind your -- 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. -- suggestion to increase the allocations? Is that yes?

37 (Pages 142 - 145)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　A.
Yes.　2　THE WITNESS: Okay.
3　Q.
I do want to talk about the　3　Q.
Turning to Page 2, Melissa
4　insurance changed to zero percent from 30　4　Francis notes that, "since MK doesn't own
5　percent.　5　the Connecticut property, can you please
6　MS. ARONSSON: I think,　6　just explain the applicability of the
7　Makenzie, can you hand me Tab 14?　7　following entries as his monthly expenses?
8　A.
All done?　8　And what type of insurance is it?" Do you
9　Q.
Yes. Before I show you the　9　see that?
10　document, do you recall information about　10　A.
Yes.
11　the change from 30 percent to zero percent　11　Q.
What do you understand Ms.
12　for the insurance line item?　12　Francis to be asking here?
13　A.
I recall talking with my　13　A.
Since the debtor doesn't own
14　colleague about it after he found out the　14　the Connecticut property, can you please
15　facts, yes.　15　justify the applicability of the following
16　Q.
What do you remember about that　16　entries as his monthly expenses and she's
17　interaction?　17　asking what type of insurance.
18　A.
Well, I think he found out the　18　Q.
What is your view, if any, on
19　insurance payment that -- that 13 thousand　19　her question?
20　dollars on Number 9 here was one hundred　20　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
21　percent pertaining to the Sherry apartment　21　A.
I would like to answer them
22　in New York City where he did not live　22　correctly.
23　during this time frame and so to the extent　23　Q.
You would like to answer the
24　that someone is paying those bills of the　24　monthly reporting --
25　Sherry, I think that's the Sherry's problem　25　A.
I'm hoping we answered her
Page 146　Page 148

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　and not on account of the debtor because as　2　questions. I mean this is going onto the
3　I'm told by the attorneys, everyone's　3　monthly reporting but I'm hoping we
4　understanding, from the facts is that he's　4　answered them correctly.
5　-- he does not have an interest in that　5　Q.
Substantively, what is your
6　real estate. So he shouldn't have any　6　view on her question here?
7　percentage in the expenses shown on the　7　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
8　monthly operating report.　8　A.
I don't want to try and guess
9　(Whereupon, E-mail Chain was　9　what she was thinking.
10　marked as Jalbert Exhibit 10 for　10　Q.
So you have no understanding --
11　identification as of this date by the　11　Verdolino and Lowey has no understanding
12　Reporter.)　12　about the question she's asking here?
13　MS. ARONSSON: The Court　13　A.
I have my understanding.
14　Reporter is going to be handing you　14　Q.
Okay. Turning to the first
15　what's marked as Jalbert Exhibit 10.　15　page, Mr. Flynn responds, "correct, he
16　This is a document produced in this　16　doesn't own it but he lives in the
17　matter with the Bates Kwok 00001691.　17　Connecticut house so these expenses that
18　Q.
I understand you're not on this　18　are paid are benefitting him". Do you have
19　document but I just want to discuss a　19　any understanding of what Mr. Flynn is
20　couple issues here. Do you recognize this　20　saying here?
21　document?　21　A.
That's why he's saying that
22　A.
No, but I recognize the　22　since he lives there, he aught to be --
23　subject.　23　there should be some level of those
24　MR. HARBACH: Give him a minute　24　expenses ascribed to him in the monthly
25　to read it.
Page 147　25　operating report in that Question 8.

38 (Pages 146 - 149)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
Mr. Flynn continues, "I have a　2　A.
I don't know.
3　question regarding the insurance as well　3　Q.
The original allocation to this
4　since this is insurance on the apartment of　4　line item I think is --
5　the Sherry". Do you understand what issue　5　MR. HARBACH: Right here
6　hes referring to here?　6　(indicating).
7　A.
Yes.　7　Q.
-- at 13 thousand and that's
8　Q.
Can you explain it for me?　8　reflected on Page 2. \$13,611. Besides Ms.
9　A.
Well, in the Number 8 -- no,　9　Francis' e-mail, do you have any
10　Number 9, the original version of this had　10　independent knowledge of that information?
11　insurance. We didn't know what it was　11　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
12　insurance on. Frankly, when we got it, we　12　A.
No. It came from Melissa
13　assumed it was on the Greenwich residence　13　Francis. I don't know where she got that
14　where the debtor and his spouse actually　14　number from or why.
15　reside. We factually found out that it's　15　Q.
Did you look into insurance for
16　actually insurance on the Sherry and when　16　the Greenwich property?
17　we found out it's insurance on the Sherry,　17　A.
No.
18　since the debtor doesn't live there and　18　Q.
Why not?
19　doesn't own it, by review of materials from　19　A.
We asked for someone in the --
20　the lawyers, it should be eliminated and　20　with the correct knowledge to give us all
21　that's what we proposed, to eliminate it.　21　of the expenses paid cash, check, wire
22　Q.
It was ultimately eliminated?　22　transfer, HCH, any other method, February
23　A.
Yes.　23　15th to February 28th on behalf of the
24　Q.
Mr. Flynn continues "I am not"　24　debtor. We didn't leave any -- we didn't
25　I am not sure it should be included here?
Page 150　25　ask for -- we didn't leave any

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

3　I think that's what he means -- "in this
calculation but interested on your thoughts　2
3　restrictions. We just said give us all of
that information. We got a summary chart.
4　and also asking Craig". Do you recall him　4　You saw it and it wasn't till we started
5　asking your opinion on this?　5　asking questions to understand some of the
6　A.
Yes.　6　background and what is behind the numbers
7　Q.
Is your opinion the same as　7　that we started making assessments and
8　Mr. Flynn's here --　8　changing what we think the legal group and
9　A.
Yes.　9　us thought it was appropriate.
10　Q.
Do you recall speaking with　10　CONTINUED EXAMINATION
11　Mr. Flynn about that?　11　BY MR. HARBACH:
12　A.
I do.　12　Q.
You said a moment ago that
13　Q.
Turning to the top e-mail here　13　originally, you and your team thought that
14　14　the 13 -- excuse me, I think you said you
15　on this chain, on Page 1, Mr. Flynn asks,
"how much was paid during this period for　15　assumed that the \$13,611 was for the
16　the Sherry". Do you see that?　16　Greenwich property because that's where he
17　A.
Yes.　17　was living. I got that right?
18　Q.
Do you know the answer to that　18　A.
Yes, sir.
19　question?　19　Q.
Then you were told that the
20　A.
I have no idea. Also, I don't　20　13,611 was actually for the Sherry, right?
21　know why he asked it.　21　A.
Correct.
22　Q.
That was going to be my　22　Q.
And at that point, you did not
23　question. Why would it matter whether --　23　inquire about was there actually any
24　how much it was as to whether it should be　24　insurance money paid for the Greenwich
25　included in the monthly operating report?
Page 151　25　property during this period, you didn't ask

39 (Pages 150 - 153)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　that question?　2　with the Brown Rudnick firm and Melissa
3　A.
No, we assumed -- actually,　3　Francis and Aaron Mitchell to determine
4　Matt had confirmed this is a list of all　4　what the accrual of professional fees. All
5　the payments made during this time frame.　5　professionals, state professionals,
6　So we had the universe that wasn't another　6　committee professionals, debtor
7　insurance payment and you know, most --　7　professionals, ordinary course -- alleged
8　many of us have owned homes. My own　8　ordinary course professionals, everybody
9　empirical knowledge is you typically pay　9　because we need to record the accrual. So
10　your homeowner's insurance once a year.　10　it's not just -- the operating report is
11　It's usually -- in the Sherry, this 13　11　not just asking for what was paid during
12　thousand dollars might have been just a　12　that period. It's asking for what's the --

13　payment for the year on a 2.5 million　13　the new form is asking what are the unpaid
14　dollar entity. They didn't tell us it was　14　amounts and we couldn't get it in time to
15　a payment so I didn't ask.　15　get the February one. So we're going to
16　CONTINUED EXAMINATION　16　catch up in this March one, we're going to
17　BY MS. ARONSSON:　17　establish what the February accrual was and
18　Q.
So I think we've covered the　18　we're going to find out what the March
19　work that you have done in connection with　19　accrual was and then we'll have the correct
20　the monthly operating report for the period　20　information and it will have to be
21　February 15th to February 28th. We've been　21　maintained as we go along and obviously, as
22　looking at that document. Is that right?　22　time goes on, if things go according to the
23　A.
Yes.　23　way the debtor would like, there will be
24　Q.
Can you think of anything else　24　payment on those fees. So there'll be more
25　that we haven't talked about with the work　25　accruals and then payments and the same
Page 154　Page 156

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　that you've done, in connection with　2　thing is true of the estate professionals
3　preparing that document?　3　and the committee and its professionals.
4　A.
Off the top of my head, no.　4　It will be a roll forward of what the
5　Q.
I think you referenced you're　5　liability is and the cash will be reported
6　preparing the next reporting cycle?　6　on Page 1. It will create liability to the
7　A.
Yes.　7　United States Trustee for their fee --
8　Q.
Can you describe your general　8　their -- their -- it's a fee. It's not a
9　process and how that defers, if it does,　9　commission. Their fee for -- which is
10　with your reporting cycle for the February　10　entirely predicated on cash disbursements
11　15th to February 28th period?　11　during the time of the monthly operating
12　A.
So the monthly operating report　12　report.
13　is basically presenting information and the　13　Q.
Do you anticipate -- strike
14　two buckets of information that are in the　14　that. Besides information that you'll
15　monthly operating report as for this debtor　15　receive from Brown Rudnick, from Aaron
16　is that Question E, the funds disbursed on　16　Mitchell, from Melissa Francis and an
17　his behalf in the 31 day period, March 1 to　17　unknown person, do you anticipate doing any
18　March 31, we're going to -- we're going to　18　investigation in connection with future
19　figure out -- we're going to get a list.　19　monthly operating reports?
20　This time, we're going to get a list so we　20　MR. AULET: Objection to form.
21　can see what there was and we can have --　21　A.
I don't know what you

22　we can have more educated discussion with　22　consider -- I'm not going to -- we're going
23　the lawyers about what was paid. That will　23　to get a report from someone. That report

25　be summarized and categorized and put in
Schedule E and in addition, we're working　24
25　is going to list out all of the payments
made during a specific time period. We're

40 (Pages 154 - 157)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　going to review that with our own　2　they paid post-petition pre-petition. Here
3　professional knowledge and with the lawyers　3　they paid pre-petition, pre-petition but
4　to make sure it all makes sense. We might　4　should have been excluded from the monthly
5　ask questions based on what shows up on the　5　operating report. Legitimate charge. It
6　spreadsheet but I'm not going to ask for a　6　wasn't an overpayment or anything. It just
7　copy of the cancelled check, a bank　7　didn't belong reported in the February
8　statement or the invoice that was paid. So　8　monthly operating report.
9　no investigation of that, just a sanity　9　Q.
So is it fair to say you later
10　check or a reasonableness check and confer　10　received a more detailed breakdown of these
11　with counsel to be sure that we understand　11　items that was included in this --
12　what's on that sheet and what we're going　12　A.
I believe we got a more
13　to report.　13　detailed -- but it was -- it was
14　Q.
So essentially, you'll rely on　14　significantly past that time. Everything
15　the rolled up numbers that are provided to　15　at that time was done by reviewing,
16　you from the individuals we've talked　16　talking, Melissa and Aaron talking with
17　about?　17　whoever and Matt talking to whoever. It
18　A.
Again, except for some queries　18　was all done by e-mail and orally. We
19　that we'll make depending on what the　19　didn't get a spreadsheet of the detail
20　information we get. If we get -- if　20　until sometime later, long after it was
21　insurance shows up again, we're going to　21　filed and actually, after the time that we
22　ask insurance on what. If repairs and　22　made available our records that we got --
23　maintenance shows up again, we're going to　23　the detail listing which is when we figured
24　confirm it's not the maid. So we'll use　24　out oh we got a problem with the monthly
25　some common sense and we'll confer with the　25　operating report. It's just a matter of,
Page 158　Page 160

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　lawyers based on what we see but I won't　2　you know, whoever is preparing these things
3　know what we're going to do until we see　3　isn't used to the rules, isn't used to
4　what -- and I hope it's soon. What's　4　what's got to be displayed -- disclosed and
5　today, April 8th?　5　what's not going to be disclosed. We try
6　Q.
Thank you. Okay, just quickly　6　and give them guidance and they just made a
7　turning back to Exhibit 8 which is I think　7　minor error. We'll fix it next month.
8　the final living expense report for the　8　Q.
Thank you. You can set that
9　period February 15th, 2022 to February　9　aside. Do you recall receiving an inquiry
10　28th, 2022. I think you had referenced an　10　from someone at U.S. DOJ regarding the
11　erroneous amount included in here. Can you　11　monthly operating report?
12　just explain again what you meant by that?　12　A.
I think I actually reached out
13　A.
I don't remember exactly what　13　to them first and my reaching out to them
14　the number is but on the security line,　14　first was -- and that's how -- was -- I
15　Line Number 9, the amount referenced her 43　15　don't know if anyone's ever prepared a
16　thousand dollars. That 43 thousand dollars　16　monthly operating report, is there one
17　included a payment of -- my memory is　17　here? So the monthly operating report, up
18　something like 12 or 14 thousand dollars　18　until December 31 or January 31 was one,
19　that was paid February 10 and so we got　19　two -- these two pages (indicating), Page 8

21　this report, the original one, and didn't
know the back -- the background and when　20
21　which is now Page 8 and Page 9 and there
might have been one more -- I thought it
22　they -- when they showed us the background　22　was five pages. It might have been four.
23　and the list of -- we saw February 10. So　23　And I filed these monthly operating reports
24　we realized we had the opposite mistake of　24　in several cases and it had been driving me
25　the time with the two professionals where
Page 159　25　crazy for three months that I would -- I

41 (Pages 158 - 161)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　would -- the way the monthly operating　2　have done anyway's.
3　reports, the bottom, for the first page, it　3　Q.
We've talked about your
4　allows you to use save if you're inputting　4　experience in Chapter 11 individual
5　data so that you can review it but it　5　bankruptcies before. Reflecting on your
6　retains a watermark up until the time you　6　experience in these instances, were any --
7　hit a button that says send the data out to　7　do you have any -- can you cite any case
8　the United States Trustees website and it　8　where you've seen such a great disparity
9　does whatever it does and when it did that,　9　between the debtor's punitive assets and
10　it kept on coming back with these extra six　10　the stated liabilities?
11　pages and this nonsense (indicating). So I　11　A.
No. In my individual cases,
12　actually reached out to the U.S. Trustees　12　the 373 million dollars of liabilities is
13　Office saying what are we doing wrong.　13　the most I've ever seen.
14　It's midnight and we're trying to get this　14　MS. ARONSSON: We don't have
15　thing in. He says no, everyone's having the　15　anymore questions.
16　same problem. We've just finally figured　16　MR. AULET: I have nothing.
17　out that's what's supposed to happen. So　17　MR. GOLDMAN: I have a few
18　that's when we started talking with him and　18　follow-ups. I'll just be a couple
19　then when he saw it, he had our e-mail　19　hours.
20　addresses and we -- and he was looking for　20　THE WITNESS: Beautiful. Do
21　the support for the 161, I believe is what　21　you mind if I go get a bottle of
22　he was asking for. I don't have it in　22　scotch?
23　front of me or if I do, I didn't -- I don't　23　MR. GOLDMAN: Get me one too.
24　-- but that's my recollection, that's why　24　I'm Irve Goldman --
25　he reached out was to get -- to get that　25　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Can you give

Page 162　Page 164
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　and to get the I think accrual of the　2　him the microphone, please?
3　professional fees going forward.　3　MR. AULET: Yes. Can I take us
4　Q.
Did you have a call regarding　4　off the record really quick so I can
5　the monthly operating report and further　5　--
6　details on the line items?　6　MR. HARBACH: Sure.
7　A.
Not a call. You have whatever　7　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is
8　e-mails there were. It was very -- I was　8　1:56 p.m. and we are off the record.
9　very limited. My call to him was a general　9　(Whereupon, an off-the-record
10　question on my three cases, I'm trying to　10　discussion was held.)
11　file these. He was able to answer my　11　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is
12　question -- my main question. He then,　12　1:58 p.m. We're back on the record.
13　when he saw the monthly operating report,　13　You may proceed.
14　he said hey, I need this and we're going to　14　EXAMINATION BY
15　obviously arrange to do that.　15　MR. GOLDMAN:
16　Q.
So was it the inquiry from the　16　Q.
Good afternoon. Irve Goldman,
17　trustee that prompted Verdolino and Lowey　17　Pullman and Comley for the Creditor's
18　to request additional details and　18　Committee. You mentioned you were
19　breakdowns of the line items contained in　19　certified as an insolvency restructuring
20　the monthly operating Excel that we've　20　expert. Did I get that right?
21　looked at?　21　A.
Advisor.
22　A.
No. We wanted to do that　22　Q.
Advisor, for how long?
23　anyway's. That just -- that gave us more　23　A.
Well, the actual designation

25　fuel to bring it to them to say hey, we got
to get to this. That's something we would　24
25　came in 1999 but in 1999, when I got the
designation, I had to spend over four

42 (Pages 162 - 165)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　thousand hours and have been in the　2　and I -- and I regret completely that
3　profession for eight years at that point.　3　we were brought in as a financial
4　So 30 years ago.　4　advisor and not an accountant to the
5　Q.
Do you typically call on that　5　debtor. Most of what you see on that
6　expertise when you're engaged as a　6　motion to employ is very important
7　professional in Chapter 11 cases?　7　stuff in the process of bankruptcy.
8　A.
Certainly some of it, yes.　8　The schedules, the SOFA's, the -- the
9　Q.
What aspects of the debtor's　9　monthly operating reports, tax return
10　financial profile do you view as needing　10　preparation, analysis of claims and I
11　restructuring?　11　don't know whether we'll have a role
12　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　12　in that or not. It depends on what
13　A.
Needing restructuring, I don't　13　the nature of the claim is. Most of
14　understand your question.　14　these claims will be legally analyzed
15　Q.
Well, you're a certified　15　but there might be a hundred reasons
16　insolvency restructuring expert. You call　16　why someone that filed a claim --
17　upon that expertise in your engagements in　17　there might be an accounting
18　Chapter 11 cases. What is it about the　18　attached, they do want us to
19　debtor's financial profile that you view as　19　investigate. So we're not brought in
20　in need of restructuring?　20　to -- just because we think there's
21　A.
Well, you know --　21　going to be a reorganization.
22　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　22　Bankruptcy is a process. There's an
23　Q.
Do you view it as in need of　23　awful lot of paper that gets pushed
24　restructuring?　24　by an awful lot of people. This
25　A.
No, I don't.　25　particular debtor is -- as I
Page 166　Page 168

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
You don't?　2　understand it, is in excess of 70
3　A.
Absolutely not.　3　years old. Doesn't even have an
4　Q.
So why do you believe he filed　4　e-mail address. Doesn't know how to
5　Chapter 11 then?　5　use computers. Doesn't know
6　A.
Well, the debtor needs　6　technology. Couldn't possibly do the
7　restructuring. I don't think --　7　monthly operating reports himself and
8　(Whereupon, a cell phone rang.)　8　virtually, in every case, there's an
9　THE WITNESS: Oh, I apologize.　9　accountant that does tax returns.
10　That was for me to remind me to do　10　There's an accountant that does --
11　something at 2:00 which I can't　11　that helps with preparing monthly
12　remember what I'm supposed to do.　12　operating reports. Even when the
13　Just making sure it wasn't on -- what　13　company has a controller, we still
14　is that when it comes back on later　14　come in in cases where -- so there
15　and it annoys you? The debtor's　15　may not be a reorganization as of
16　restructuring, if you're referring to　16　right now. There's going to be a
17　the questions were brought up -- in　17　plan someday. I don't know what role
18　an ordinary Chapter 11 case that's a　18　we're going to play but if we need to
19　business, there's lots of things to　19　be -- if the counsel and debtor needs
20　consider if there's a real　20　us to play a role, we will but until
21　restructuring. You've got to　21　that day, there's lots of necessary
22　restructure the debt, the secure　22　work to do in the ordinary course of
23　debt. Maybe mezzanine, unsecured　23　the process in the life of a Chapter

25　debt. Maybe work with payables, all
sorts of -- that isn't the case here　24
25　11 case here.
Q.
What you just described were

43 (Pages 166 - 169)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　menial tasks of accounting?　2　counsel wants us to play and the debtor
3　A.
I disagree.　3　wants us to play. If they want us to play
4　Q.
No, you disagree?　4　part of the role of looking at the
5　A.
Preparing the SOFA's and　5　pre-petition payments, which we ordinarily
6　preparing the MOR's, you think that's all　6　do in most of the cases we do, we come up
7　menial tasks?　7　with the list, here it already exists. We
8　Q.
All right, I won't argue with　8　might ask for support to confirm but it's
9　you on that. What is it about this case　9　entirely up to the team that's running the
10　that you -- you view that is in need of　10　case. We're not running the case. We're
11　restructuring, if anything?　11　-- we're -- I think we're an important
12　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　12　member of the team but we're not -- the
13　A.
Yeah, I don't know what you're　13　accounting firm is not driving the case.
14　trying to ask.　14　The debtor and his counsel is driving the
15　Q.
Are there assets that need to　15　case as is true of every case.
16　be restructured?　16　Q.
Do you know where the debtor's
17　A.
The only assets I understand　17　books and records reside?
18　are -- I think the lawyers call them　18　A.
I do not.
19　litigation assets in the like.　19　Q.
Do you know if the debtor had a
20　Q.
So how would they be　20　pre-petition account?
21　restructured or part of a restructuring?　21　A.
Only from knowledge from
22　MR. AULET: Objection to form.　22　lawyers.
23　A.
You're probably asking the　23　Q.
Who was the accountant?
24　wrong guy but if there's ongoing　24　A.
Accountant?
25　litigation, I suspect there's going to be　25　Q.
Yeah, I asked you --
Page 170　Page 172

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　-- you would hope there would be settlement　2　A.
Oh actually, I take that back.
3　negotiations, there might be mediation,　3　I saw actual tax returns. There was --

5　there might be arbitration. Someone's　4　every preparer has to list their name on a
going to try and liquidate those assets
5　tax return they prepare. So there was --
6　into cash with which to pay the creditors.　6　someone paid tax returns at least. What
7　I don't know whether we'll play a part in　7　else they did, I don't know.
8　that or not.　8　Q.
Okay, what was the name of the
9　Q.
As part of your -- the scope of　9　accountant?
10　your engagement, there is a bullet point　10　A.
I don't remember.
11　that states that you're going to provide　11　Q.
Have the tax returns been
12　assistance --　12　produced to any party in the case thus far?
13　THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry,　13　A.
I imagine we produced them
14　Counsel. I need to hear you better.　14　because we had them. They would have come
15　Q.
Provide assistance with　15　in an e-mail. So they would have been
16　reviewing debtor books and records for　16　produced as it relates to this I think. I
17　possibly avoidable transactions such as　17　think they were but they were very small
18　preference and fraudulent transfer claims.　18　tax returns prepared by -- I assume a New
19　You stated that you did not review any of　19　York or a Connecticut accountant. I don't
20　the debtor's books and records, correct?　20　know who.
21　A.
Currently, so far, yes.　21　Q.
You just don't -- you obviously
22　Q.
Did you ask for any?　22　looked at it, you just don't recall the
23　A.
No.　23　name of that accountant right now?
24　Q.
Do you intend to?　24　A.
I don't -- well, yes. I'm not
25　A.
Depends on what role the
Page 171　25　even sure if I looked at it. I don't know

44 (Pages 170 - 173)

Case 22-50073 Doc 404-26 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 46 of
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　if, at the time when we were trying to do　2　I don't know.
3　everything, we were using those because we　3　Q.
What information, if any, did
4　needed some of the information on there.　4　you rely on in getting comfortable taking
5　We were referred to them by Melissa for　5　this case without a post-petition retainer?
6　certain issues that the lawyers thought　6　A.
I've been doing this for 35
7　were important and we went and took a look　7　years. I'm not sure. I don't remember
8　at them but I would have looked at　8　ever getting a post-petition retainer but
9　something besides the name of the preparer.　9　my firm works with --
10　At the time, it didn't matter.　10　(Whereupon, a cellphone rang.)
11　Q.
Have you ever spoken to the　11　THE WITNESS: Shit, I'm sorry.
12　debtor?　12　Now it's off. We -- we're a
13　A.
Yes.　13　practitioner in Massachusetts and we
14　Q.
When?　14　do cases in Delaware, New York,
15　A.
Wednesday at the 341 hearing to　15　Connecticut, Rhode Island,
16　introduce myself.　16　Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
17　Q.
Is that the only occasion, to　17　Vermont, Maine. We represent Chapter
18　your knowledge, that you've spoken to the　18　7 trustees in virtually all of those
19　debtor?　19　states. We probably represent and do
20　A.
I don't speak Mandarin and he　20　work for virtually ever Chapter 7
21　apparently doesn't speak English. So I　21　trustee in Rhode Island, every
22　have not spoken to him. Or Chinese. I'm　22　Chapter 7 trustee in Massachusetts, a
23　not sure which it is. Excuse me.　23　couple in Maine, a couple in New
24　Q.
You did not receive a　24　Hampshire and it's not unheard of for
25　post-petition retainer, correct?　25　us to go and do 50, 60, 70, 80

Page 174　Page 176
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　A.
Correct.　2　thousand dollars of work before we
3　Q.
Are you confident that your　3　even know the case will ever have any
4　fees will be paid?　4　money. It's an investment that we
5　A.
I don't know if I'm confident.　5　make. Now I didn't make an
6　I'm hoping.　6　investment in this case. Whatever we
7　Q.
What source do you believe your　7　incurred -- and I don't know what
8　fees will be paid, from what source?　8　that is, I'm hoping I'm going to
9　A.
It will come from the Estate.　9　collect it but if I don't, then I'll
10　If we're going to be paid, as I understand　10　have a write-off like I've had many,
11　it, it will come from the Estate. I don't　11　many, many, many times in the past.
12　-- I have not thought of or have any　12　Q.
Again, I don't think you
13　agreement on any other source of payment.　13　answered my question.
14　Q.
Do you mean the litigation　14　A.
Oh all right --
15　claims or recoveries?　15　Q.
If you -- if you relied just on
16　A.
I would expect the only people　16　your experience in engagements in
17　that have a retainer in this case are Brown　17　bankruptcy cases and that's it for taking
18　Rudnick. Everybody else will be looking to　18　this case without a pre or post-petition
19　be paid -- that is a debtor's professional　19　retainer, is that what you mean --
20　or a committee professional, professionals　20　A.
I don't understand your
21　that file an application with the Court and　21　question.
22　the Court allows their retention will be　22　Q.
What information, if any, did
23　looking to get funds. We're all going to　23　you rely on in taking this case without a

25　be looking from the same place. What that
source is going to be, if it will ever be,　24
25　pre or post-petition retainer?
MR. AULET: Objection to form.

45 (Pages 174 - 177)
1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　A.
I do work with lots and lots of　2　engagement?
3　attorneys and when attorneys call up and　3　A.
Absolutely not.
4　they ask if we're interested on working on　4　Q.
Have you had any communications
5　the case, I work on the case.　5　with any representative from Golden Hill?
6　Q.
So you relied on being asked to　6　MR. HARBACH: Golden Spring.
7　get involved by Brown Rudnick?　7　Q.
Golden Spring.
8　A.
Yep.　8　A.
I was on e-mails with someone
9　Q.
That's it?　9　from -- well, first of all, Melissa Francis
10　A.
Yep, and then after that, it's　10　has a Golden Spring e-mail address. She's
11　bankruptcy process. Whatever happens,　11　counsel to the debtor. I've been informed
12　happens.　12　of that from the beginning. The only other
13　Q.
You didn't look at the　13　contact --
14　financial profile of this debtor at all in　14　Q.
She's counsel for the debtor or
15　determining --　15　Golden Spring?
16　A.
I think -- I think I knew he　16　A.
Debtor.
17　had limited assets or no assets and I think　17　Q.
Melissa --
18　I knew he had a lot of litigation ongoing　18　A.
Francis.
19　but -- maybe I'm a fool but I only have one　19　Q.
But she has an e-mail address
20　other person that I have to answer to and　20　from Golden Spring?
21　he lets me run my business just like he　21　A.
Correct. They were in all of
22　runs his business and my feeling is when a　22　these e-mails that they were putting in
23　lawyer calls up and they have a case, then　23　front of me.
24　we respond because if I don't respond,　24　Q.
She's counsel for the debtor is
25　maybe the next time he calls another
Page 178　25　your understanding --

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　accountant. So I didn't do all the things　2　A.
I've been told emphatically by
3　that you think a normal person should have　3　her and by Brown Rudnick that she is
4　done to protect themselves on payment.　4　counsel to the debtor, as is Aaron
5　Q.
Did you rely on any degree on　5　Mitchell. As is Brown Rudnick.
6　the financial profile of Golden Spring?　6　Q.
Okay. Are they part of the
7　A.
No.　7　application to retain ordinary course
8　Q.
You didn't do any due diligence　8　professionals, if you know?
9　on Golden Spring before agreeing to get　9　A.
I don't know that they're going
10　engaged in this case?　10　to be paid by the Estate or not. I don't
11　A.
I'm pretty sure I didn't know　11　know what they're -- what they're -- what
12　Golden Spring existed by the time I agreed　12　motions they filed to be paid. I'm not --

14　to be in this case.
Q.
How about Lamp Capital, did you　13
14　I'm not representing them and I'm not
asking them.
15　do any investigation of Lamp Capital?　15　Q.
So back to the question whether
16　A.
No.　16　you had any communications with Golden
17　Q.
Did you ask any questions about　17　Spring --
18　what the financial profile of those two　18　A.
So my colleague, Matt Flynn,
19　entities was --　19　had I think one or two phone calls with
20　A.
No.　20　someone at Golden Spring. There was a
21　Q.
-- before getting involved?　21　number of e-mails which we looked at in
22　A.
No.　22　here and you know, 6, 7, 8, 9, whatever,
23　Q.
Were you promised that you　23　that person is not identified but I did not

25　would be paid from Golden Hill or Lamp
Capital before agreeing to take on the　24
25　speak to that person. I had -- I was on
the e-mail exchanges and I wrote exactly

46 (Pages 178 - 181)

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT

2　one e-mail to that person and actually　2　for the month of which two-thirds of that
3　directed it to Melissa and Aaron when I　3　is security.
4　wrote my e-mail.　4　Q.
Is the person or entity that is
5　Q.
Do you know why that person's　5　funding the post-petition living expenses
6　name is redacted on the exhibit?　6　Golden Spring?
7　A.
Yes.　7　A.
I don't know. That's not one
8　Q.
Why?　8　of the questions and no one has volunteered
9　A.
Because you heard Golden　9　that information. It just says -- the
10　Spring's attorney. They're worried about　10　question says is there a third-party making
11　the safety of their employees given the　11　payments on behalf of the debtor
12　issues surrounding this case. I don't know　12　post-petition. We answered that question
13　anything about that. I'm just doing what I　13　as best we could. We'll fix the one error
14　told. I am not disclosing the name.　14　that remains but it did not ask and they
15　Q.
It was at Golden Spring's　15　did not tell us, to my knowledge, who is
16　counsel's behest that that was redacted is　16　making the disbursements.
17　your understanding?　17　Q.
And you didn't ask?
18　A.
Well, I don't know whether it　18　A.
No. I don't know how it would
19　was Golden Spring's counsel or Golden　19　affect -- it's not in the monthly operating
20　Spring itself. I don't know -- I don't　20　report so it's none of my business I think
21　know who started it. I just -- in fact, I　21　is what I would have been told.
22　don't think I knew it until the day before　22　MR. GOLDMAN: I don't have any
23　-- the day before, maybe Wednesday is when　23　further questions.
24　I found out that -- that -- that the　24　MR. AULET: I have nothing.
25　documents were redacted.　25　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Can I take
Page 182　Page 184

1　C. JALBERT　1　C. JALBERT
2　Q.
Is it your understanding that,　2　us off the record for the day?
3　according to the debtor, all of his living　3　MR. GOLDMAN: Yes.

5　expenses, pre-petition, were paid by Golden
Spring?　4
5　THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off
the record at 2:18 p.m. and this
6　A.
Well, they were paid by　6　concludes today's testimony given by
7　somebody else. I can't say emphatically　7　Craig Jalbert.
8　they were paid by Golden Spring.　8　(Whereupon, at 2:18 P.M., the
9　Q.
So whatever that person or　9　Examination of this witness was
10　entity -- whoever that person or entity　10　concluded.)
11　was, are the living expenses, post-petition　11
12　living expenses that were prepared in the　12　°
°
°
°
13　various schedules, consistent with what was　13
14　paid pre-petition?　14
15　A.
We didn't do an investigation　15
16　as to what the pre-petition nature of　16
17　payments or amount of the payments or　17
18　anything. So I don't have any -- any　18
19　comparative information. That information　19
20　will be developed as we see the months go　20
21　by but I think the final -- the final　21
22　number for 15 days of the expenses for the　22
23　individual ended up being something like 28　23
24　or 29 thousand dollars for 15 days. So　24
25　multiply that by two 60 thousand dollars
Page 183　25　Page 185

47 (Pages 182 - 185)

D E C L A R A T I O N

I hereby certify that having been

first duly sworn to testify to the truth, I

gave the above testimony.

I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing

transcript is a true and correct transcript

of the testimony given by me at the time

and place specified hereinbefore.

14　1

C E R T I F I C A T E

STATE OF NEW YORK
)

: SS.:
COUNTY OF KINGS
)

I, LENAYA LYNCH, a Notary Public for

and within the State of New York, do hereby

certify:

That the witness whose examination is

hereinbefore set forth was duly sworn and

that such examination is a true record of

the testimony given by that witness.

I further certify that I am not

CRAIG JALBERT

Subscribed and sworn to before me

this _____ day of ________________ 20___.

NOTARY PUBLIC　14
related to any of the parties to this

action by blood or by marriage and that I

am in no way interested in the outcome of

this matter.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto

set my hand this 8th day of April 2022.

<%24350,Signature%>
LENAYA LYNCH

Page 186　23

E X H I B I T S
3 JALBERT EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT EXHIBIT
PAGE
4 NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
5 Exhibit 1 Notice of Deposition

6 Exhibit 2 E-mail Chain

7 Exhibit 3 E-mail Chain

8 Exhibit 4 Debtor's Application

9 Exhibit 5 Official Form 106Sum

10 Exhibit 6 Global Notes

11 Exhibit 7 E-mail Chain

12 Exhibit 8 E-mail Chain

13 Exhibit 9 E-mail Chain

14 Exhibit 10 E-mail Chain

(Exhibits retained by Court Reporter.)

I N D E X
18 EXAMINATION BY
PAGE
19 MS. ARONSSON

MR. HARBACH

20 MS. ARONSSON

MR. HARBACH

21 MS. ARONSSON

MR. GOLDMAN

48 (Pages 186 - 188)

[& - 373]

&　86:10,22,24　132:20 134:13
161　24350
188:21

દિદ
1:15,18 2:3,12　103:13 115:4,4,8　135:13,17 140:18　26
120:3,12
0　119:21 124:25　162:21　28
183:23
164:4 166:7,18　132:23
161,323　28th 72:9 129:23

32:16　167:5,18 169:24　133:5　133:12 134:3

35:10　111 187:10　ી રિટ
187:21　140:14 152:23

140:8　11:53 90:21　16th
132:17　154:21 155:11

147:17　2:18 34:22
12　119:19,21
17　159:10

129:3　85:15 159:18　18
48:22 127:22　29
183:24

6:9　75:21 131:25
120　19
131:3　2:00
167:11

2:18　120-1 131:25　19,488 125:6,15　2:18
185:5,8
2:14
06601　132:6　17:5
1979　3
1　125:3,14,19
122b　17:8
1983　23:23 35:8,12

3:16 10:14.17
1　124
6:8　1987
17:10　96:25 97:4,8,13,24
17:10 23:22 72:10　129
187:11　1999
165:24,24　115:13 116:21
97:9 113:14.18　12:22 90:25　1:22
139:21　144:12 187:7
114:14 118:3　19:8 42:12
13　1:28
140:4　3,850 96:5
132:21 151:14　55:14 103:14　1:56
165:8　30
155:17 157:6　126:5 146:19　1:58
165:12　7:5,19 11:2,22
187:5　152:7 153:14　1 a
94:19,22 95:8　107:6 144:4,6,14
133:25 147:10
10　154:11　95:11
1 b　145:11 146:4,11
166:4
147:15 159:19,23　13,611 152:8　2　30th
2:4
187:5,14　153:15,20　2
23:22 32:14,18　31
17:10 72:10
100 2:18 142:15,18　187:12
131　33:2,4 41:6 97:13　74:24 77:7 121:16
143:8 187:19　139
187:13　105:21 142:14　155:17,18 161:18

1:19 2:5,10　14
19:8 98:7 146:7　148:3 152:8 187:6　161:18
100th
44:7　159:18

6:9
101　147
187:14　154:13
2.5　32
187:6

187:20　15
77:6 89:10　20
45:8 186:19　341
16:17,22 45:13
106a 94:21　97:25 145:4　2019
79:18　45:14,17 46:14,15
106sum 93:14　183:22,24　2020
79:19　46:19,24 47:8,12
94:2 187:9　187:20
ી રેઝે　2021
127:24　47:13,18 51:15
109 132:22 135:18　187:21
154　2022
1:10 3:5　69:5 116:2 123:15
140:17　15th 63:14 72:9　125:4 159:9,10　123:18 126:13
109,827 133:7　125:4 129:23　188:19　127:10,18 174:15
133:11 134:3　21 45:8 49:9 84:9　342
16:16
109,827.12 132:13
10:17 1:11 3:4　140:14 152:23　92:21 107:14
45.9
22　17:13 176:6

187:7
10:24
11:15,19　154:21 155:11　22-50073 1:63:22
11 1:5 21:2,4　ી રેતે-વે　22nd 3:4　36 95:13 96:2,4,8
32:11 55:3 70:3　96:18 105:18
16　23　96:16

74:19 81:6,11　126:5　97:8　113:19 164:12

[4 - advisor]

4　95:17,19,24
61　ਰਤੋ
187:9　172:24 173:9.19

47:24 48:3 91:4
ব　62
95:15,16,17　2　173:23 179:2
96:9,12,17 97:13　6:49
39:10　1:11 3:4
a.m.　accountants 21:5
107:14 108:8　108:8 130:23
6e　11:15,19 90:21　21:6,7,8
113:13 117:4　7　aaron 25:17,19,25　accounting 22:21
119:4 130:23　7
1:18 2:4,9 81:6　26:10 31:4,7 32:9　63:21 168:17
144:20 187:8　86:25 95:18　56:18 57:3 59:3,4　170:2 172:13
7:18 138:18
40　103:12 119:16,21　59:10,18 99:2,7　accounts 69:21,22
142:16　128:24 129:11　102:11 103:17　accrual 70:20

159:15,16　133:16 135:14　104:12,16 105:3　156:4,9,17,19
43,655.44.
138:16　136:18 141:17　105:13 106:7　163:2

72:11　142:16 144:14　109:24 110:18　156:25
accruals

187:8　176:18,20,22　112:15 124:2　69:2
accrue
181:22 187:11　129:18 135:23　accrued 78:23,25
5　70
6:19 7:16 169:2　139:8 143:14　79:6
റ
93:12,15 108:8　176:25　156:3 157:15　10:6
accurate
117:4 130:23　7006
2:14　160:16 181:4　136:11,12
187:9,19　77
100:20 111:6　182:3　10:2.9
accurately

6:19 7:14,18　78
93:19　136:24
118:13 141:9,10　ability 9:25 10:5
able 53:7 78:6　accustomed 53:9
141:14 142:7,8,9　8　79:11 136:13　19:15
act
142:12 144:13　8
1:10 119:21　138:3 144:25　4:8 188:15
action
145:11 176:25　120:3 131:16,21　activity 63:22
21:3 126:6
500　134:7 135:11,18　163:11　80:12
રેન્ડર
75:13,17 76:2　149:25 150:9　absolutely 82:6　actual
109:17
505b
75:5　159:7 161:19,20　167:3 180:3　137:7 165:23
50th
44:6　181:22 187:12　abundance 132:20　173:3
51.495.67
140:17　7:16 176:25
80　142:21　85:21 140:16
add

122:11　83
17:9　102:23
accepted　addition
155:25
94:22 95:23
રેરે　2:13
850　access 115:23　additional 163:18

95:17,19　87
17:10　119:6 124:16　address 6:6,7,8
રજ
95:24 96:2　8th
3:5 127:24　accidently 125:13　169:4 180:10,19
6　159:5 188:19　account 37:25　addresses
162:20
9　38:24 52:15 63:19　administer 4:6
7:5 11:2,8,21,22

97:24 98:7 111:4　64:17 65:3 66:19　administrative
111:8 117:5　0
119:21 139:24　72:6991:6,8 92:11　77:17 78:7,10
140:7 146:20　92:16 147:2　81:8
119:16,18,21　150:10 159:15　172:20　advising 22:20
181:22 187:10　161:20 181:22　accountancy
17:8　53:261:11
6:19 7:14 75:11
60 -　187:13　accountant 18:16　advisor 17:24 18:7
75:19 176:25　48:10 82:17
90　70:22 80:6 168:4　21:5,6 34:7 36:23
183:25　83:22 92:23　169:9,10 172:23

[advisor - aronsson]

37:7 39:8 40:20　allocations 145:25　121:17 122:12　applicable
107:11

41:20 43:2 48:9　allow 12:20 38:23　130:21 148:21,23　application 48:2,7
48:21 49:5 70:22　65:2 87:11　151:18 163:11　48:18 49:2 175:21
165:21,22 168:4　allowed 80:12　178:20　181:7 187:8
advisors 62:4.5　81:20　answered 34:20　applies 53:17,22
affairs 14:6 55:20　allows 82:15,17　148:25 149:4　103:22
111:18 112:5　162:4 175:22　177:13 184:12　apply 118:2
affect 184:19　amend 89:7 125:3　8:5,23
answers　appointed 22:13
affidavit 48:25　amended 125:19　130:20　appreciate 35:4
49:7　amendment 60:7　anticipate 47:16　approach 22:20
affiliated 42:3　amendments　50:19 52:9 54:16　appropriate 73:14
affiliations 4:13　55:21 112:6　55:6 59:25 61:19　113:8 114:7 153:9
165:16
afternoon　amount 13:9　61:21 63:25 67:16　approval 70:16
agent   90:2 91:7,20　81:22 96:5 118:12　76:4,24 79:21　approved 62:10
91:21,24　133:8.9 134:17　106:15 157:13,17　64:22
153:12 166:4
ago　137:25 138:12　anticipated 60:5　april 1:10 3:4,5
agree 3:14 59:12　159:11,15 183:17　60:11 62:9 68:15　137:22 159:5
91:696:16 100:22　amounts 51:22　anticipates 78:16　188:19
107:13,17　132:19 134:23　anybody
83:24　arbitration
171:4
agreed 143:8　138:4,9 156:14　145:16　areas 12:11 22:12
179:12　analysis   68:6 83:4　anymore
116:9　22:21
agreeing 179:9,25　84:3 87:19 89:18　142:11 164:15　19:4
arena
agreement 55:13　92:25 95:2 96:19　anyone's
161:15　170:8
argue
61:8 67:25 78:6　105:9 107:20　41:14
anytime　argument 117:21
91:22 127:23,25　115:18 168:10　anyway
69:16　144:6
175:13　analyzed
168:14　anyway's 70:8　aronsson   2:5 4:18
128:8
agreements　analyzing
80:18　87:6 163:23 164:2　4:18 6:2,12 7:4,13
128:16,18　82:4　apartment 101:6,9　10:12 11:12 12:9
ahead  40:8 122:20　andersen
17:9　102:6 114:17　26:20,25 27:13
97:15
aircraft　167:15
annoys　115:2,7 146:21　29:18 32:11 34:21
119:5　8:20 9:11
answer　1 50:4　35:6 47:22 48:5
alive 114:5　9:19,21 24:21　apologize 35:2　83:11 88:13 90:18
allegations 40:24　26:22,24 27:12　56:22 167:9　93:10,17 97:6
81:5 156:7
alleged　28:12 29:11,11,13　apparently 28:19　99:22 103:5,6
alleging 83:18　29:17 36:11 38:17　174:21　111:2 128:22
alliance 2:3 4:20　53:16,21 54:12　appear
100:20　129:7 130:5 131:2
6:13 10:23　83:20 88:16　appearance 4:16　131:5,9,23 139:18
allocated 141:16　101:20 104:18　4:12
appearances　146:6 147:13
allocating
117:25　105:16 113:17　applicability　154:17 164:14
allocation
145:11　116:8,21 118:2　148:6,15　187:19,20,21
152:3　119:6 120:5

[arrange - back]

arrange
163:15　164:9 170:15,17　23:9 28:8 182:10　164:16 165:3

arrangement　170:19 171:5　attorneys 2:3,9,13　166:12,22 170:12
54:20　178:17,17　14:16 15:6,16　170:22 177:25
arrive
136:8　assigned 74:24　25:8 32:3 40:21　184:24
17:9
arthur　52:18 86:17
assist　46:23 47:6 98:9　26:13
authored
articulated 143:22　assistance 45:11　98:21,24 99:6,14　27:9
ascribe
144:2,15　55:18 61:9 73:16　104:24 106:20　authorities 75:11
ascribed
118:17　80:17 82:8 84:23　109:23 142:3　authorization 48:7
141:25 149:24　85:18 86:6 88:21　147:3 178:3.3　48:19 49:3
ascribes
120:22　112:3171:12,15　attributed 138:4　authorized 4:6
121:7　assisted
15:19　audible
8:24　automobiles
ascribing 142:22　51:9,12 109:14　audio
3:12,12　115:16,16
asia 2:3 4:20 6:14　112:10,11 113:3　audit
75:13,18,20　available 135:2
10:23　141:4　auditing 22:21　137:16 160:22
aside    15:22 47:5　associated
66:20　149:22
aught　69:16
avoid
67:7 83:17 161:9　117:2　august 17:10　avoidable 82:9
asked
36:8 47:19　association
107.9　aulet 2:10 5:3,3,12　83:2 84:13 171:17
53:23 56:15,21,22　9:6 92:20
assume　9:17 12:4,6,24　aware 25:17 30:19
64:20 110:7　92:24 173:18　13:6 24:20 26:16　88:6 90:8,10
151:21 152:19　assumed 150:13　26:23 27:11,13,16　114:24
172:25 178:6　153:15 154:3　28:7 29:19 34:10　awful 47:11
asking 13:17,19,20　assuming 28:15　37:16 39:5 46:20　168:23,24
34:14 67:18 98:22　50:23 72:13　57:22 58:18 61:4　awfully
88:4
101:2,18,21 102:2　118:21　64:14 66:13 77:4　awhile
82:9
105:15 148:12,17　assumption　78:21 79:22 83:7　b
149:12 151:4,5　143:10
83:13 84:25 85:8
153:5 156:11,12　attach
69:14　88:3,8,16 91:9　2:65:21 6:5 7:5
o
156:13 162:22　attached 79:16　92:2 93:5 95:9　11:2,22 75:13,17
170:23 181:14　168:18　96:10 97:2 98:15　76:2 94:17,20,21
asks 108:11,17,18　attachment 129:9　99:23 101:17　94:23 95:12 96:13
113:14 115:13　129:21 130:8　102:8 103:24　187:2
120:4 121:16　140:11　104:13 106:18　19:25
baby
122:11 151:14　attempts
120:24　108:21 111:22　babysitting 19:10
166:9
aspects　attend 45:13　112:22 113:24　bachelor 17:7
assenting 37:9　attended 45:14,16　118:4 122:18　back 7:18 11:19
assessment 101:14　47:11　126:3 127:7 129:4　13:20 27:6 29:24
153:7
assessments　attending
4:11　129:25 130:16　34:3 41:5 49:13
78:3
asset　46:14　131:6,11 132:11　55:12 69:25 71:16
88:2 94:2
assets　attention
105:20　133:18 141:18　82:16 90:25 91:4
104:7 111:16　attorney 2:17 4:17　148:20 149:7　95:17 103:7
120:23 128:12　6:12 9:18 13:5　152:11 157:20　111:23 112:13
114:4 127:11
[back - bullet]

131:7 140:4 159:7　beach
122:14　119:8 121:2　bridgeport
1:3

159:21 162:10　bearing 76:9,9　big 34:4,15,16　2:14 3:21
165:12 167:14　32:15 140:8
bears　35:20 52:23　brief 90:22
173:2 181:15　42:18
beast　biggest 19:4　14:21
briefly
background 17:2　beautiful
164:20　bill 45:19 72:12,23　65:24 128:5
153:6 159:21,22　beginning
4:16　73:6　163:24
bring
balance 69:20　180:12　billed 67:13,14,16　7:21 22:9
broad
hank  37:25 52:15　behalf 12:23 21:7　bills 19:14 55:3　broadly 109:5
64:21,24 65:6　21:8 38:21 108:11　72:3 122:4 146:24　115:13 132:8
69:18 91:6,16　108:15 117:6　binders 69:14　brought 40:3,20
158:7　118:14,23 130:24　birnbaum 2:17　167:17 168:3,19
bank's 91:18　132:17 133:12　bit
14:20 17:2　brown 2:8 5:4
bankruptcies　144:10 145:15　21:25 24:3 46:17　15:21 23:10,16
164:5　152:23 155:17　139:16　24:6,8,18 25:8
bankruptcy 1:2　184:11　biweekly 66:25　26:5,6,10 30:9
3:20 20:11,22　behest
182:16　blood 188:15　31:20 32:3 38:10
21:13,24 22:6,11　believe 24:4 45:2,5　131:13
blue　38:12 39:2,16
32:25 38:15 39:19　50:18 72:14 99:19　bookkeepers　43:23 49:24 56:13
39:22 44:6,7,7　100:7 144:21　52:16 53:14,18,19　57:4 58:25 59:6
51:2 64:25 74:13　160:12 162:21　53:20,25 66:19　59:10,17 64:20
75:4 77:15,24　167:4 175:7　books 82:8 84:12　83:18 98:25 99:6
80:4,13 81:2,23　believes
27:19　84:14,18 92:18　102:11,17 103:18
82:15 83:23 90:3　102:23
belong　171:16,20 172:17　103:18 104:10,16
115:2 168:7,22　119:23 160:7　boston 17:6,6　104:17 105:7,12
177:17 178:11　belonged 101:15　18:16　106:6 109:24
base 59:9　102:6 103:14　bottle 34:25 42:8　112:14 123:25
based 27:16,21　belonging 104:8　164:21　126:7,14 139:7
28:23 63:5 72:25　ben   13:5 14:16,21　bottom 49:11　156:2 157:15
87:14 158:5 159:2　ל: 24　105:19 132:9　175:17 178:7
basic
129:16　beneficiary　145:19 162:3　181:3,5
basically 37:9　121:25　bought 101:23　buckets 19:3
39:11 155:13　benefit 124:3　117:18　21:19 155:14
basis 37:14,21　benefitting 149:18　box 2:14　budget 61:10,23
66:25 69:7,8　best 13:2 28:9 52:4　brain 93:8　61:24 62:2
73:10 80:11 81:7　56:10 60:9,14　break   9:9,12 85:9　budgeting 42:10
81:8,8 90:7　137:2 145:20　85:15 139:19　63:16 86:15
123:12 143:9,23　184:13　breakdown　budgets 42:13,13
145:9　better 86:23　160:10　build 78:2
bates 32:15 35:9　103:25 171:14　breakdowns　building 113:16
129:2 140:8　beyond 14:13　163:19　bullet 55:17 61:7
147:17　38:18 53:13 116:7　92:19 112:3

[bullet - certain]

114:16 171:10　96:1 97:1 98:1　callable
144:5　175:17 176:5

business 6:7 22:10　99:1 100:1 101:1　called 5:21 20:18　177:3,6,18,23
41:21,24,25 42:8　102:1 103:1 104:1　41:8 89:22　178:5,5,23 179:10
42:11,22 43:3　105:1 106:1 107:1　calling 145:7　179:13 182:12
167:19 178:21,22　108:1 109:1 110:1　calls 25:11,15　cases 21:2,4 40:16
184:20　111:1 112:1 113:1　58:24 93:6 143:15　41:25 64:10 90:5
businesses 19:5　114:1 115:1 116:1　178:23,25 181:19　92:8 161:24
162:7
button　117:1 118:1 119:1　camera
8:11　163:10 164:11
117:23
buying　120:1 121:1 122:1　cancelled 158:7　166:7,18 169:14
C　123:1 124:1 125:1　capabilities 18:2　172:6 176:14
126:1 127:1 128:1　capital 126:8,20　177:17
2:2 3:1 4:1 5:1,21
C　129:1 130:1 131:1　179:14,15,25　cash
36:14 37:10
6:17:18:19:1　132:1 133:1 134:1　116:3,17 117:9
car　37:19 42:12,13
10:1 11:1 12:1　135:1 136:1,7　67:679:4
care　61:10 62:12,13,23
13:1 14:1 15:1　137:1 138:1 139:1　career 47:12　63:15,15,22 69:9,9
16:1 17:1 18:1　140:1 141:1 142:1　97:14 117:19
cars　69:21 78:18 79:2
19:1 20:1 21:1　143:1 144:1 145:1　1:6 3:22 6:17
case　79:3 86:18 87:13
22:1 23:1 24:1　146:1 147:1 148:1　15:24 33:21 41:19　121:19,22,24
25:1 26:1 27:1　149:1 150:1 151:1　41:22,23,24 42:19　152:21 157:5,10
28:1 29:1 30:1　152:1 153:1 154:1　43:3,4 44:3,13,14　171:6
31:1 32:1 33:1　155:1 156:1 157:1　48:10 49:15 50:22　catch 88:25 89:2
34:1 35:1 36:1　158:1 159:1 160:1　50:23 51:2,5,20　89:14,15 156:16
37:1 38:1 39:1　161:1 162:1 163:1　52:10 54:17 55:8　categories 7:21
40:1 41:1 42:1　164:1 165:1 166:1　55:11,16 56:10　118:24 136:2,23
43:1 44:1 45:1　167:1 168:1 169:1　59:7 60:9,14　137:25
46:1 47:1 48:1
49:1 50:1 51:1　170:1 171:1 172:1　61:22 62:9,19　categorization
173:1 174:1 175:1　64:2 66:5 67:4,17　137:9
52:1 53:1 54:1　176:1 177:1 178:1　68:12,21 69:2　categorized
55:1 56:1 57:1
58:1 59:1 60:1　179:1 180:1 181:1　70:4,7,9,11 71:5,6　155:24
61:1 62:1 63:1　182:1 183:1 184:1　71:19 73:11,25　category
138:4
64:1 65:1 66:1　185:1 186:2 188:2　74:2,7,11,19 75:9　cats 89:12
67:1 68:1 69:1　188:2　75:14,22 76:22　caution 46:21 83:7
70:1 71:1 72:1　calculates 69:10　77:21 78:5,25　132:20 142:21
calculation 151:3　79:5 81:6 82:24　caveat 89:3
73:1 74:1,9,10　calender 72:7　84:7 86:4,25 90:6　cc'd 26:12 27:10
75:1 76:1 77:1
78:1 79:1 80:1　19:10 31:18
call　93:20 107:24　3:10 167:8
cell
81:1 82:1 83:1　45:18 79:11 102:4　111:5 131:24　cellphone 176:10
84:1 85:1 86:1　104:25 163:4,7,9　164:7 167:18,25　cellular 3:8
87:1 88:1 89:1　166:5,16 170:18　169:8,24 170:9　87:18
cents
90:1 91:1 92:1　178:3　172:10,10,13,15　certain 40:17 94:3
172:15 173:12　113:22 174:6
93:1 94:1,17 95:1
[certainly - concurring]

certainly
22:3　158:10　clients
18:25 19:13　70:23 156:6 157:3

62:20 72:20 84:3　checked
64:24　close
70:5　165:18 175:20
91:11 102:14　141:5　closure
75:15　common
158:25
106:19 109:8　checks
66:20　clothes
103:12　communicate
26:9
112:10 124:7　chinese
174:22　club
122:13　30:11 57:11 99:4
140:25 166:8　chooses
76:6　code
75:4 80:13,14　99:5
certification
17:20　cia
18:13　82:15　communicated
17:23 18:9　cira
18:7,14,15　cohn
2:17　58:16 98:24
certifications　circulate
32:4,8　collateral
42:14　communicates
18:12　circulated
88:7　colleague
45:5,15　30:13
certified
17:23　circumstances　100:25 129:20　communicating
18:4,6 165:19　15:25 33:13 60:6　146:14 181:18　104:19
166:15　73:14 114:8　colleagues
13:7　communications
certify
186:4,8　cite
164:7　30:18 31:24　65:14,19 180:4
188:8,13　citizens
65:6　collect
13:13 177:9　181:16
chain
32:17 35:11　city
58:8 146:22　college
17:6,6　company
89:21
38:6 103:21 104:9　civil
11:2　18:16　169:13
129:10 131:15　claim
52:20 80:19　column
136:7　comparative
139:23 147:9　80:24 81:3,5,16,21　combine
72:7　183:19
151:14 187:6,7,11　168:13,16　come
50:23 53:14　compare
110:6
187:12,13,14　claimed
125:5　54:21 71:16 74:18　compared
110:6
change
146:11　claims
52:24 54:8　74:20 169:14　complete
69:18
changed
139:4　81:7,10,12,25 82:5　172:6 173:14　completely
74:5
146:4　82:11,18 88:2　175:9,11　108:3 168:2
changes
43:24　90:2 168:10,14　comes
19:15　compliance
42:24
44:10　171:18 175:15　100:23 118:8　complicated
43:4
changing
139:3　clarification
96:15　167:14　52:23
144:22 153:8　97:3　comfortable
176:4　compound
139:2
chapter
1:5 21:2,3　clarity
119:20　coming
34:25　comprehensive
55:3 70:3 74:19　cleaning
145:5,15　62:23 78:18 142:5　89:6
81:6,6,11 86:10,22　clear
24:12 28:18　162:10　computers
169:5
86:24,25 115:3,4,8　39:14 98:10　comley
2:12 5:7　concerning
12:21
164:4 166:7,18　101:21　165:17　concerns
142:25
167:5,18 169:23　clearly
56:18 79:2　comment
36:21,21　144:11
176:17,20,22　141:3　37:8,8,9　concluded
185:10
charge
160:5　clerical
55:5,7　comments
112:25　concludes
185:6
chart
136:18　client
4:23 5:2　commercial
70:7　conclusion
28:20
137:14 153:3　30:8 34:5,6 35:21　commission
157:9　concurred
39:11
check
73:3 110:18　36:23 37:6 38:3　committee
2:13　concurring
37:12
134:23 138:8　39:8　5:8 20:19 21:4,5　38:4
152:21 158:7,10　62:3 66:23 70:21

[condition - covered]

condition
9:25　119:18 121:11　controller
169:13　43:14 62:3,4

condo
107:10　124:5 125:23　conversation
8:17　70:21 97:12,18,20
confer
158:10,25　128:11 134:21　conversations
3:8　98:12,14 99:19
confident
175:3,5　135:20 154:19　27:17 44:5 46:22　100:17 124:8
confirm
65:2　155:2 157:18　47:6 102:15,16　135:22 136:5
86:10,21 114:4　conservative　converted
70:12　141:3 158:11
136:11 158:24　143:25 144:9　copies
69:18　169:19 171:14
172:8　145:21　copy
8:14 94:22　172:2,14 180:11
confirmation　consider
157:22　100:21 158:7　180:14,24 181:4
20:17　167:20　copyrights
120:4,6　182:19
confirmed
70:12　consideration　120:14,17　counsel's
182:16
115:5 143:14　141:22　corp
74:10　count
118:15
154:4　consistent
183:13　corporate
74:7　countries
42:6
conflicts
24:12　constituency　corporation
74:7　country
42:22
confusion
69:17　21:11,13　74:9,10 75:23　county
188:4
congress
19:18　consultation
98:17　correct
58:19　couple
60:14 92:7
conjecture
122:19　126:2 142:3　62:17 63:10 72:13　99:21 110:13
connecticut
1:2　consulted
64:21　76:23 94:25 95:25　147:20 164:18
2:14,18 3:21 17:5　138:18,18　97:23 102:25　176:23,23
76:13,14,19　consulting
88:21　107:25 108:25　course
30:21
113:20 148:5,14　contact
25:3 30:19　109:2 114:12　52:19 56:16 62:8
149:17 173:19　180:13　121:12 134:8,19　70:24 156:7,8
176:15　contacted
23:6,8　149:15 152:20　169:22 181:7
connection
11:5　contacts
25:4　153:21 156:19　courses
17:15
15:6 24:19 33:21　contained
59:22　171:20 174:25　court
1:2 3:20 4:4
34:8 36:4,9,25　71:14 107:21　175:2 180:21　5:10,19 6:15,25
39:2,18 43:2,25　136:24 163:19　186:9　8:11 10:13 13:10
46:3,10,18 50:14　contention
28:3　corrected
134:4　32:12 35:6 40:12
50:25 51:6,20　contents
101:8　134:12　45:3 47:22 55:2
57:16 60:2 61:15　contested
6:23　correctly
148:22　62:10 78:9 87:12
61:19 63:9 64:12　context
20:12 22:6　149:4　93:10 101:10
66:11 68:15 73:19　continue
3:13 74:8　cost
117:2,25　111:2 128:22
76:25 78:17 80:21　74:16 130:6　118:10,13,18　131:19 147:13
83:5,19 84:14,19　continued
16:16　141:25 142:6,22　171:13 175:21,22
84:23 85:21 86:2　103:4 153:10　142:23 144:3　187:15
87:20 88:15 89:19　154:16　145:3　cover
16:25 107:3
92:15 96:20 97:11　continues
68:21　costly
89:6　128:13
97:16 98:6,22　150:2,24　costs
144:4　covered
13:11
103:8 104:7 106:3　continuing
17:17　counsel
4:10 5:4,7　76:20 83:14 85:19
107:23 109:11　137:20　9:12,21 13:6,15　89:8 103:9 119:17
110:11 112:21　25:21,24 30:3　154:18
[cpe - description]

сре
17:15,16　147:11　120:22 121:7　deducting 79:21

craig 1:14 3:17 6:5　dated 127:24　122:8,17 124:18　deferred 78:3
48:25 151:4 185:7　daughter 141:23　125:3,5,12,18　defers
1 રેરને તે
186:15　143:2　126:23 130:25　define
82:19
161:25
crazy　david 2:6 4:21　132:17 133:13　definition 72:5
create
72:23 157:6　100:4 103:9　141:5 142:5,21,23　101:5
created
86:13　day   39:9 44:24　143:5,12,15 144:3　degree   17:7 18:16
133:22　45:14,16 46:24　145:18 147:2　45:13 179:5
141:19,20
creator　47:8 51:13,14,15　148:13 150:14,18　18:19
degrees
creditor
42:15　52:4,4 63:16　152:24 155:15　delaware
176:14
47:14 81:5,13,16　132:18 155:17　156:6,23 167:6　14:19
delayed
creditor's 2:13 5:8　169:21 182:22,23　168:5,25 169:19　department 19:22
165:17　185:2 186:19　171:16 172:2,14　19:22 20:7 22:2
creditors 20:19,19　188:19　172:19 174:12,19　64:23
21:9 67:2 86:16　14:25 72:11
days　178:14 180:11,14　depend 52:11
86:23 171:6　75:12,19,21 82:17　180:16,24 181:4　depending 42:8
crises
52:7　82:21 83:22 92:23　183:3 184:11　51:23 78:24 79:4
138:8
cross　145:4 183:22,24　debtor's 38:23　158:19
crosschecked　deadline 81:10,13　47:25 48:18 49:2　depends 78:18
136:22　deal
80:6　58:9,11,13 62:4,18　168:12 171:25
cumulative 69:7　167:22,23,24
debt　63:4 74:20 79:8　depicted 136:24
134:17,18　debtor    1:7 5:5　79:20 87:15,25　deposition 1:14
curious
88:14　16:9,13,15,20,23　106:15 108:10,19　3:12,17,23 6:22,25
88:17
current　20:11 21:5,6　108:22 111:16　7:6 10:16,24
118:20　25:16,22 36:15　123:20 141:23　11:22 13:4,21
currently 18:21　37:11,20,25 38:3,9　144:10 164:9　14:23 15:7,17
88:7 122:9 134:16　38:22 39:15 42:16　166:9,19 167:15　16:5,10,11 27:25
171:21　45:13 52:14,25　171:20 172:16　28:20 41:12 45:23
cycle
155:6,10　54:19,25 57:10,10　175:19 187:8　49:21 137:20
d　57:12 58:16 62:15　debtors 20:18 42:4　187:5
d
81:14 109:22　70:22,22 76:6,8,12　48:6　depositions 40:14
128:3 186:2　76:21 77:3 78:19　december 74:24　42:9
deposits
187:17　79:23,25 80:4　77:7 161:18　describe 46:17
162:5,7
data　82:8 84:12,14　decide
103:10　58:20 155:8
date
1:10,16 10:18　88:23 94:4 101:8　decision 37:12　described 70:14
32:19 35:13 44:20　101:11,16 108:16　39:12 87:14　103:21 104:10
111:18 113:18　102:13 141:4　128:5 136:2
48:4 67:19,20
71:4 75:12 86:3　114:3 115:15,21　declaration 62:19　142:10 169:25
87:20 93:15 111:9　116:5,6,10,12　declared 40:18　description
114:7
129:12 131:17　117:7 118:5,14,16　deductible
78:2　138:11 187:4
137:15 139:25　118:24 120:15,16　79:2,7

[descriptions - due]

descriptions　70:16,25 91:6,8　106:10,21 126:11　109:7,12 129:5,8

136:10　92:11,15　139:13 143:13　182:25
designated
12:2,7　direct
29:10,16　155:22 165:10　dog
103:13
designation　105:20 130:2　discussions
43:13　dogs
89:12
165:23,25　directed
28:10　43:15 106:5　doing
7:18 22:18
detail
145:8　88:23 182:3　113:11 137:21　51:8 60:2 61:19
160:19,23　directly
104:15　dismissed
70:12　61:21 78:17 88:17
detailed
27:15　143:11　disparity
164:8　91:16 157:17
160:10,13　director
51:4,4　displayed
161:4　162:13 176:6
details
135:24　disagree
81:17,19　dispute
28:3 29:19　182:13
163:6,18　170:3,4　29:20 130:6　doj
161:10
determination　disbursed
155:16　distinct
74:5,14　dollar
154:14
38:5 39:3,12　disbursement
62:9　distribution
136:8　dollars
96:5
87:17 101:10　72:5 117:17　136:14 138:13　125:15 126:8
137:5　disbursements　distributions　132:21,22 133:23
determine
87:13　52:17 54:4,15,16　139:6　133:24 146:20
156:3　54:24 63:16,20　district
1:2 3:20　154:12 159:16,16
determined
72:25　67:2 68:22 73:2　divided
141:13　159:18 164:12
determining　77:14 86:19 91:14　division
1:3 3:21　177:2 183:24,25
178:15　91:15 92:15 137:8　docket
48:10　double
73:2
develop
67:5　157:10 184:16　93:19 97:7 100:20　110:18 134:23
developed
183:20　disclaimers　111:6 131:24　doubt
114:20
developing
87:24　111:15　document
10:20　draft
88:7 98:14
development
86:7　disclose
46:21　32:14,15 33:3　107:23 114:19,20
difference
38:8　83:9,16　35:9,16 48:6,12,15　126:13 130:15
41:23 108:6　disclosed
84:6　48:23,24 55:12　136:17 140:24
different
41:21　161:4,5　93:18,21 94:11　141:16 142:15
42:18 51:22 52:2　disclosing
29:7　96:25 100:20　drafted
31:19
77:21 80:5 108:2　118:22 182:14　101:19 105:19　43:11,16 112:25
108:3,16 144:18　disclosure
68:25　107:21 109:4　drafter
138:17
differing
51:22　discovery
40:13　111:5,11 112:9,21　drafting
31:22
difilippo
2:22 4:2　discreet
89:4　127:18 128:25　46:2,5 98:13
digit
110:15,15　discuss
8:13　131:24,25 135:10　103:10 105:22
digital
120:19　147:19　140:9 141:21　112:11 124:5
diligence
179:8　discussed
85:23　146:10 147:16,19　drafts
32:4 62:21
dip
14:9 28:24　94:5 98:20 106:19　147:21 154:22　driving
161:24
54:20 61:22 62:14　127:15 130:4　155:3　172:13,14
63:19,23 64:2,4,10　143:7　documents
13:9　drop
41:10
64:16 65:3,11,15　discussing
132:3　13:13,16,17,23　due
44:23 45:7
65:19,22,24 66:3,6　discussion
11:17　27:22 57:8,15,16　55:3 69:11 70:19
66:15 68:2,20　15:24 99:15　57:20 105:11　75:7 81:22 179:8

[dues - exactly]

dues
107:10　effectuating
63:20　engagement 23:5　61:2
essentially

5:22 186:5
duly　91:14　23:7 24:2,10,19　158:14
188:10　efficient 53:8　25:6 26:4,11　establish 62:2
duties 41:20 43:2　efficiently 52:5　30:12,14 31:16,22　81:21 156:17
43:20,21 50:24　eight
166:3　32:5 34:9 36:5,9　established 74:13
55:691:25 93:4　either 42:17 81:5　40:5 43:12 44:2　estate 42:20 53:4
e　101:9 103:16　45:2 46:3,5 50:15　54:21 62:25 68:25
104:22 110:17　51:25 52:2 55:15　70:24 73:17 74:3
2:2,2 5:21 6:5
e　elapsed
39:11　55:16 84:15,19　74:14.14.18.21.23
13:11,23 14:2,4　elect 74:25 75:2,13　171:10 180:2　74:23 76:9,10,14
15:20 26:9,13,13　75:18　engagements　77:20,24 78:19
27:9,10 30:19　election
19:18　166:17 177:16　79:24 80:4,7,8,10
32:17 34:3 35:11　electricity
107:11　english 127:13　81:23 83:3 94:22
35:19 37:18 38:6　electronic
15:19　174:21　107:6 113:19,22
39:7.9 41:17　electronics
100:24　ensure 73:12　114:4 147:6 157:2
49:22 59:11 81:14　119:17　136:23　175:9,11 181:10
99:19 104:23,24　eliminate
131:13　entire 79:14,14,18　estate's
87:25
106:9 112:24　150:21　entirely
79:6　estates
74:4
117:5 129:9,10,15　eliminated
150:20　138:23 139:6　estimate
105:21
129:17,24 130:11　150:22　157:10 172:9　estimated 71:13
131:15 132:22　emphatically　42:3
entities　106:12
139:23 141:2　181:2 183:7　179:19　estimates
73:11
147:9 151:13　empirical 154:9　entitled 1:16 48:6　estimating 73:7
152:9 155:16,25　employ 14:8 38:21　entity 74:5 103:15　97:14
etcetera
160:18 162:19　48:8,19 49:3　114:24 119:25　120:5
163:8 169:4　90:11,17 168:6　126:22 154:14　114:13
evaluation
173:15 180:8,10　employed 18:21　183:10,10 184:4　68:2
event
180:19,22 181:21　36:15 37:11,20　entries 148:7,16　103:21
events
181:25 182:2,4　38:9,11,16 90:14　equitable 113:15　104:10
186:2 187:2,6,7,11　91:25　125:23
erroneous　everybody 60:21
187:12,13,14,17　28:17
employee　159:11　75:9 93:7 156:8
188:2,2　employees 28:22　erroneously
125:5　175:18
earlier 68:10 94:5　29:2,5 42:5,23　125:14　everybody's 45:2
100:7　50:20 182:11　110:22
error　69:8
easy
73:2　employment 38:14　161:7 184:13　everyone's 46:2
edits
135:15,16
140:23　89:7,8　136:4
errors　147:3 162:15
endeavor 124:10　escrow 91:7,20,21　evidence 87:11
educated 155:22　ended 183:23　91:22,24　exactly 53:7 58:9
education
17:18　engaged 20:11,15　esq 2:5,6,6,10,15　115:4 117:4
educational 17:3　20:16 24:23 166:6　2:19　130:22 159:13
effectively
38:4　179:10　181:25

[examination - file]

examination
5:25　expectation　27:21
expose　fear 28:5,6

100:2 103:4　106:22　extent
22:12 60:5　feasibility
86:8
153:10 154:16　expected 33:5,13　65:4 78:3 83:8　87:3,7,9
165:14 185:9　123:20　113:6 137:12　feasible
87:16
187:18 188:9,11　136:18
expense　143:17,18 146:23　february 45:8
examined 5:24　1 રેત-8　100:21
extra　63:14 69:3 72:9,9
101:3
example　expenses
71:13　110:15 162:10　77:6 122:22 125:4
109:3 163:20
excel　72:4 77:15,17,18　f　129:22 132:17
169:2
excess　78:23,25 79:7　133:11,12,25
exchanges 181:25　105:22 106:12,16　81:14 109:17,18
ﺎ　134:3 140:14,14
160:4
excluded　106:23,23 107:2,3　188:2　152:22,23 154:21
excluding -
125:21　107:9,15 108:10　fa
41:19　154:21 155:10,11
excuse 11:10　108:15,20,23　102:24
face　156:15,17 159:9,9
51:14 123:16　117:6 123:2　fact
115:25 182:21　159:19,23 160:7
126:12 137:22　124:11 129:22　15:24 60:5
facts　federal 11:2 19:17
153:14 174:23　130:9 133:5,15　99:10,13 113:9　19:18 73:17 76:12
exhibit 7:7 10:14　134:10 136:24　114:8 146:15　79:14.16,18
10:17 32:14,18,21　140:13 147:7　147:4　73:13 123:3
fee
35:8,12 41:6 43:6　148:7,16 149:17　factually 150:15　157:7,8,9
47:24 48:3 91:4　149:24 152:21　42:25 53:16
fair　feel 48:11 67:3
93:12,14 111:4,8　183:4,11,12,22　59:20,23 60:22　feeling 41:18
128:24 129:11　184:5　72:16 78:15 84:21　142:2 178:22
131:7,16,21　experience 7:21　88:24 94:19 96:9　fees 33:18 53:9
133:16 134:7　20:24,25 64:4,7　97:19 103:20　54:24 62:6 68:2
135:11,14,18　82:3 164:4,6　104:6 106:13　69:8,11 70:21
136:18 139:24　177:16　130:13 134:20　72:24 77:18,25
140:7 141:17　expert 22:19,19　136:21 145:12　156:4,24 163:3
142:15 144:14　40:11,19 41:2　160:9　175:4,8
147:10,15 159:7　91:12 165:20　44:8
fairly　felt 132:24
182:6 187:3,3,5,6　166:16　familiar 7:23　fiduciaries 20:17
187:7,8,9,10,11,12　expertise
166:6,17　12:10 89:21　figure 136:5
187:13,14　expired
69:15　family 19:15 58:8
103:13 118:9　155:19
exhibits
187:3,15　36:24
explain　129:8 132:16　figured 160:23
existed
101:23　41:22 70:2 82:13　162:16
179:12　108:5 132:8 148:6　143:18
far　file 29:5 38:15,20
existence 57:7　150:8 159:12　6:21 67:14　40:11 52:25 53:3
143:17　explained 37:15　171:21 173:12　74:8,16 75:6 76:6
exists
172:7　explanation　139:17
fast　76:11,11,16 77:23
expect 51:7,19　144:15　father 118:18　78:14 81:5,7,16,20
175:16　explicit 66:2　143:20　89:6 137:22
fault 73:8　163:11 175:21

[filed - francis]

filed 3:19 13:9　179:6,18　62:23 87:13
flows　112:22 113:24

28:24 42:7,8,9　4:8
financially　fluid
104:20　118:4 122:18
45:3 48:10 49:7　87:16　13:7 30:18
flynn　125:3,14,16 126:3
55:22 62:19 63:14　financing 14:10　45:6,16 49:15,16　127:7 130:16
68:12 69:23 75:8　28:25 54:20　50:5 56:4,24　132:11 133:18,22
75:24 76:5 84:4　find   40:10  117:25　112:17 129:18,19　134:15 135:3
93:19 100:10　156:18　149:15,19 150:2　141:18 148:20
111:5 122:22　finish
8:19　150:24 151:11,14　149:7 152:11
125:4,14,18　finished 54:11　181:18　156:13 157:20
131:24 135:3　firm
4:3,5 21:24　flynn's 46:10 50:7　166:12,22 170:12
160:21 161:23　22:13 24:16 39:18　151:8　170:22 177:25
167:4 168:16　40:3,25 51:5　44:20
focused　187:9
181:12　52:15 56:2,15　focusing
46:6　forms 98:16
files
80:10　112:15 139:14,14　108:18　forth
101:7 112:13
filing 32:24 61:11　156:2 172:13　folks 15:15 25:6　188:10
63:12 73:23 75:12　176:9　29:24 30:10,14　forward 63:17
82:17 92:23 96:9　firms
62:7 134:7　49:14.24 129:21　68:17 69:6 75:14
96:12 98:23　first 5:22 16:18　follow
164:18　108:13 134:19
113:23 132:3,6,18　19:3 21:23 43:16　following 44:25,25　157:4 163:3
138:2　43:22 44:6,9,21,24　148:7,15　133:22
found
filings   56:7 73:18　45:14,25 46:24　follows 5:24　145:3 146:14,18
final 62:22 87:17　47:8 51:13,14,14　food
119:3　150:15,17 182:24
133:15,24 135:17　51:15 55:17,18　fool
178:19　four   15:12 19:2,3
135:21 136:3　69:23 73:9 75:19　186:8
foregoing　19:23 21:18 82:23
137:24 140:12,20　89:3 93:25 94:14　foreseeable 124:22　161:22 165:25
140:22 141:4　105:3 112:3　102:19
forget　foxboro 6:9
144:8 159:8　122:21 129:23　11:10
forgot　frame
34:25
183:21,21　130:25 139:10　form 22:16 34:10　118:23 146:23
finally 46:13　149:14 161:13,14　37:16 39:5 54:5　154:5
162:16　162:3 180:9 186:5　57:22 58:18 62:10　francis 25:18,23
finances 61:12　fit 89:13　64:14 66:13 72:6　26:2,10 30:2,6,7
63:12,15　fitting 101:4　72:21 77:4 78:21　31:4,8 32:9 56:17
financial   14:5 21:4　five 39:10 128:2　80:25,25 81:2,3　57:3 59:3,5,18
21:6 22:15 34:7　128:15 141:8　84:25 88:3 91:9　99:2,7 102:11,20
36:23 37:6 39:8　161:22　92:2 93:5,13 94:2　102:21 103:17
40:20 41:20 42:25　161:7 184:13
fix　94:21 95:9 96:10　104:12,15 105:4
48:9,20 49:4 54:6　flavors 17:15　98:13,14,15,19　105:14 106:7
55:20 62:4,5　2:4
floor　102:8 103:24　109:25 112:15
64:22 111:17　flow
61:10 62:13　104:13 106:18　124:2 129:19
112:5 166:10,19　62:13 69:21 86:18　108:21 109:15　135:23 139:8
168:3 178:14　110:20 111:22　143:13 148:4,12

[francis - hampshire]

152:9,13 156:3　general
88:21　god
47:14　golden   2:17 5:16

157:16 180:9,18　100:15 155:8　goes 7:18 43:19　26:18 27:17,18
frankly 33:12　163:9　79:5 101:6 124:18　28:7,10,14,17,23
150:12　generally 13:25　156:22　29:6 57:23 58:3
fraudulent 82:10　18:24 21:19 22:8　going 3:3 10:13　179:6,9,12,24
82:20 171:18　24:2 25:5 36:24　32:12 35:7,8　180:5,6,7,10,15,20
48:11
free　44:12 50:24 55:2　36:14 37:5,10,19　181:16,20 182:9
frequently 39:20　55:14 57:4 66:3　37:24 39:15 40:8　182:15,19,19
40:2,5 42:15　66:23 70:2 73:8　40:10,10 41:9　183:4,8 184:6
64:25 73:5　74:24 80:23 82:14　44:9 45:5,20 47:3　goldman 2:15 5:6
front    15:9  44:18　90:12 109:10　47:23 52:3,12,22　5:6 6:20 7:10 27:3
162:23 180:23　110:10 115:6　53:7,13 54:2,3,7,8　28:4 29:8 85:14
fuel
163:24　49:23
getting　54:9 59:2 68:17　164:17,23,24
full
19:8 73:10　86:23 135:20　68:18,19,21 69:5,6　165:15,16 184:22
fully
12:20　137:21 176:4.8　69:24 70:19 73:23　185:3 187:21
function 87:24　179:21　76:8,18,19 77:6,9　golf 123:4
fund 2:4 4:20 6:14　120:21
gettr　78:22,23 80:5,15　good 3:2 6:10 44:8
10:24　10:6 14:25
give　85:8,14 87:2,3　165:16
funding 127:23　147:24 152:20　89:5 91:18 92:20　goods 100:25
128:17 184:5　153:2 161:6　92:23 93:8,11　119:16,19
funds 70:17　164:25　96:24 106:24　graduate
18:18,19
108:12 130:23　given 105:14　107:12,18 108:13　graduated 17:4,6
138:12 155:16　131:22 134:25　111:3 115:4　gratuitous 37:7,8
175:23　182:11 185:6　118:22 123:9,10　164:8
great
furnishings　186:10 188:12　123:13,23 124:12　greenwich 113:20
100:25　75:11
gives　124:13,14,17　123:9,14 150:13
further
163:5　glasses
11:11　128:23 129:15,23　152:16 153:16,24
184:23 186:8　14:6,7
global　131:19 134:19　group 26:14 113:3
188:13　51:10,11 111:7,14　139:15,16 143:6　143:7 144:8 153:8
future 69:23 78:4　111:24 187:10　147:14 149:2　120:20
gtv
78:5,8,12,20 85:3　go 3:14 7:22 11:12　151:22 155:18,18　guess 15:8,12 19:3
86:19 87:13　28:2 38:12,13　155:19,20 156:15　77:5 127:2,3,6
124:22 157:18　40:13 44:17 53:6　156:16,18 157:22　149:8
g　54:19 90:18　157:22,24 158:2,6　guessing
66:8
5:21　103:25 107:5　158:12,21,23　guidance
161:6
g　111:23 114:4　159:3 161:5 163:3　170:24
guy
garbage 61:3,3,5,6　122:3,20 124:18　163:14 168:21　h
107:12
gas　139:15,16,19　169:16,18 170:25
gasoline
117:9　144:7 156:21,22　171:5,11 175:10　23:16 187:2
h
half 93:7
gathered 29:4　164:21 176:25　175:23,25 177:8
123:17　183:20　181:9　hampshire
176:16
176:24
[hand - increase]

hand 27:24 32:12　174:15　hoping
148:25　116:25 117:18

34:22 47:23 93:11　hearings
46:15　149:3 175:6 177:8　118:9 123:2,5
110:9 111:3　21:13　hospital 122:4　173:13
117:21 128:23　heat
107:11　59:12
hot　immediately 44:25
130:22 131:20　1:17 3:23
held　hotel
114:17　9:25
impair
146:7 188:19　11:17 23:2 165:10　15:13
hour　important 8:18
handing 147:14　help 24:13 46:7　hours
15:11,11　75:3 132:24 168:6
happen 47:13 52:3　57:7 137:4　39:10 67:21　172:11 174:7
52:12 69:3 89:12　helped
137:9　164:19 166:2　inadvertent 133:6
89:13 162:17　helpful 14:14　house 101:25　134:6,22
happens 80:3　38:25 137:4 138:8　149:17　inadvertently
81:15 82:22　helping 100:9　household 97:25　125:12 132:16
178:11,12　169:11
helps　100:24 101:4,15　133:21 134:2
harassed 143:15　hereinbefore　102:5 119:16,19　inappropriate
harassment 27:21　186:11 188:10　housekeeping　29:9,16
28:5,6　hereunto 188:18　144:20,23　include 22:18
harbach 2:6 4:21　163:14,24
hev　huh
8:25　80:11 94:16
4:21 23:12 41:13　high 17:3,5 19:10　human 110:21　107:14 122:15
59:13 85:16 99:20　19:24 94:14　hundred 64:9　included 65:14
99:25 100:3,5　hill   179:24 180:5　138:21 139:4　125:15 132:23
103:2 147:24　hire
80:5　141:13 142:22　133:19 134:2,5,13
152:5 153:11　90:5
hired　143:6,24 144:2　134:23 137:14
165:6 180:6　hiring
40:25　146:20 168:15　150:25 151:25
187:19,20　history 17:3　husband
141:12　159:11,17 160:11
hard 127:12　hit
162:7　142:8 145:14　includes 19:6
haven 2:18 116:2　hits
73:7　i　61:23 62:12
116:15　1:5 2:9 3:18 5:5
ho　idea 7:19 44:8　including 39:22
hazard 15:8　11:6 94:4 111:18　67:23 90:17　40:14 61:11 70:24
hch 152:22　hold 18:11,18　126:24 151:20　86:7 115:16
head 8:24 155:4　36:14 37:10,19　identification　inclusion 125:24
heading 11:22　holding 114:25　10:17 32:19 35:13　income 52:25 53:3
health 121:18,22　home 6:7 107:8,9　48:3 93:15 111:9　53:5 62:15 63:5,9
121:24 122:2,8　118:19,25　129:12 131:17　73:17,24 74:16,17
hear 127:13　homeowner's　139:25 147:11　74:20 76:15,17,22
171:14　154:10　identified 7:12　77:8,11,12 78:8
heard 45:24 82:21　homeowners　103:22 104:8　79:20 87:25 125:5
104:15 127:15,17　107:7　134:7 181:23　125:16,21
182:9　119:5 154:8
homes　identity 26:18　incorrect 125:18
hearing 45:17　honestly 12:21　27:23 28:16 74:8　increase 141:8
46:14 47:9 51:15　hope 64:3 100:22　imagine 54:18　142:12,17 145:24
123:18,19 127:18　159:4 171:2　61:25 66:22

[increased - issues]

increased
142:14　139:7,12 145:2　122:2,8 146:4,12　investigated

144:13　146:10 152:10　146:19 148:8,17　101:22 110:11,24
increasing
141:10　153:3 155:13,14　150:3,4,11,12,16　investigation
40:7
143:23 145:10　156:20 157:14　150:17 152:15　40:9,22 59:16
incurred
142:6　158:20 174:4　153:24 154:7,10　63:8 95:7 97:22
177:7　176:3 177:22　158:21,22　102:9 108:24
independent
63:8　183:19,19 184:9　intellectual
120:7　115:6,18 119:14
95:6 97:21 114:10　informed
44:2　120:13,15,18　119:22 128:11
119:13 122:5　99:13 103:16,18　intend
171:24　157:18 158:9
123:19 128:7　103:19 104:16　intended
32:25　179:15 183:15
152:10　180:11　34:19 40:4,6 62:7　investigations
indicate
7:2　informs
127:5　89:15 110:20　114:11
indicating
135:12　initial
140:23　125:19　investment
177:4
137:18 152:6　141:20,21　interact
16:23　177:6
161:19 162:11　initiated
25:12　22:3　invoice
158:8
individual
21:8　input
43:21 59:6　interaction
146:17　involved
20:7
24:15 41:2,19,23　72:22 114:22　interactions
15:2　31:21 49:15,17,20
43:4 70:4 74:3,4,6　inputting
162:4　interest
20:22　50:21 52:24 53:4
74:15,15,16,17　inquire
153:23　53:11 77:20 80:3　55:24 56:6,20
75:23 77:2,19　inquiries
51:16　87:12 113:16　57:24 59:7 65:10
164:4,11 183:23　inquiry
161:9　119:10 120:7,18　65:18 90:9 100:8
individual's
27:20　163:16　121:16 147:5　101:13 105:22
individually
79:24　insiders
82:19　interested
4:9　109:6,9 132:4
individuals
19:5　insolvency
17:24　22:15 41:17 49:10　178:7 179:21
42:19 57:8 85:5　18:5,6 19:4 21:24　151:3 178:4　involvement
115:9
158:16　165:19 166:16　188:16　iphone
103:11
industry
60:17,21　instance
62:3 89:9　interests
101:11　irrespective
70:19
inform
124:3　138:15　115:13　irs
76:19 89:10
information
12:20　instances
40:19　interfere
3:11 10:5　irve
2:15 5:6
22:16 24:16 29:3　164:6　interference
3:9　164:24 165:16
29:7 30:22,24　institutions
64:23　internal
25:6　island
176:15,21
31:3,9,12 58:10　instructed
43:7,9　80:14　issue
27:23 73:6
59:6,16 69:24　instructing
26:21　internally
13:10　75:10 82:23
85:7 94:4 98:11　26:23 27:12　interpreter
127:14　124:23,23 150:5
99:11,17 104:11　instruction
29:10　interrelated
113:7　issued
54:7
105:3,7,12 110:6　instructor
18:5　interrupt
41:8　issues
18:3 27:24
116:9 124:10,14　instructs
9:21　introduce
174:16　40:24 44:8 52:6
124:16,20 127:5　insufficient
8:25　investigate
102:14　53:15 72:3 110:11
133:2 135:2　insurance
69:14　105:17 110:25　147:20 174:6
136:13 137:3,12　107:8 117:10　113:10 124:17　182:12
137:19 138:3,7　121:17,18,22,24　168:19
[item - know]

item 55:5 61:16,20　36:1 37:1 38:1　149:1 150:1 151:1　keypunch
98:19

63:11,18 64:13　39:1 40:1 41:1　152:1 153:1 154:1　keypunched 98:16
66:12 68:6,16　42:1 43:1 44:1　155:1 156:1 157:1　kids
73:15,20 80:16,21　45:1 46:1 47:1,24　158:1 159:1 160:1　138:25
82:7 83:6,19　48:1,2,11,25 49:1　161:1 162:1 163:1　kind 20:22 88:24
84:11,24 85:18,22　50:1 51:1 52:1　164:1 165:1 166:1　116:17 118:17
86:2,6 87:7,21　53:1 54:1 55:1　167:1 168:1 169:1　122:12 134:22
88:15,20 89:19　56:1 57:1 58:1　170:1 171:1 172:1　188:4
kings
91:5 92:19 94:14　59:1 60:1 61:1　173:1 174:1 175:1　45:20 105:6
knew
94:15,16 95:4,7,23　62:1 63:1 64:1　176:1 177:1 178:1　113:9 178:16,18
95:24 96:2 97:11　65:1 66:1 67:1　179:1 180:1 181:1　182:22
97:13 103:11,12　68:1 69:1 70:1　182:1 183:1 184:1　know 7:16 9:10
103:13,14 104:2,2　71:1 72:1 73:1　185:1,7 186:15　22:4 30:12 31:7
111:20 113:17　74:1 75:1 76:1　187:3　31:17 33:19 34:13
127:22 142:14　77:1 78:1 79:1　1:6
jam　34:18 36:7 38:16
144:12,20 146:12　80:1 81:1 82:1　january
161:18　38:16,22 39:13
152:4　83:1 84:1 85:1　13:8 31:25
10　41:4 43:18 47:3
89:16 96:21
items　86:1 87:1 88:1　49:16 50:0 56:5　50:3 52:3,21,22
97:24,24,25 98:7　89:1 90:1 91:1　56:24 112:17　53:9 57:23 58:2,3
99:12 101:3,12,15　92:1 93:1,12,14,22　joint 86:13　58:12 60:4,9,25
102:5,22 103:22　94:1 95:1 96:1　2:22
jon　62:21 64:9 65:16
107:13 119:16,18　97:1 98:1 99:1　jonathan 4:2　66:3,5,23,24 67:6
119:23 121:8,11　100:1 101:1 102:1　judge 29:9,13　72:19,23 76:7,17
132:7 136:19,25　103:1 104:1 105:1　87:16　77:7,10,12,13
137:13 160:11　106:1 107:1 108:1　judges 22:14　79:10,12,13 80:14
163:6,19　109:1 110:1 111:1　judgment 37:22　83:23 84:5,10
J　111:4,8 112:1　102:4 136:15　86:14 89:9,11,20
2:10,15 5:21 6:5　113:1 114:1 115:1　17:9
june　89:25 90:4 103:25
J
jalbert 1:15 3:1,18　116:1 117:1 118:1　justice 64:23　104:3,4 107:10
4:1 5:1 6:1,5,14　119:1 120:1 121:1　justify
148:15　109:19 111:24
7:1 8:1 9:1 10:1　122:1 123:1 124:1　k　115:3 116:3,3,4,5
10:14,16,19 11:1　125:1 126:1 127:1　keep 41:2 52:16　116:5,14,17 117:8
12:11 13:1 14:1　128:1,24 129:1,11　59:14 107:12　117:8,10,20 118:7
15:1 16:1 17:1　129:14 130:1　124:17　120:21 121:13
18:1 19:1 20:1　131:1,16,20 132:1　keeping 42:11　122:23,24 123:3
21:1 22:1 23:1　133:1 134:1 135:1　keith 20:6　125:8,13,20
24:1 25:1 26:1　136:1 137:1 138:1　ken
9:17 13:6　126:20 127:12
27:1 28:1 29:1　139:1,24 140:1,7　14:16,21,24　145:15 150:11
30:1 31:1 32:1,13　141:1 142:1 143:1　kenneth 2:10 5:3　151:18,21 152:2
32:18 33:1 34:1　144:1 145:1 146:1　kept 7:17 162:10　152:13 154:7
34:23 35:1,8,12　147:1,10,15 148:1　157:21 159:3,21

[know - llp's]

161:2,15 166:21　122:13 124:4
lago　160:5
legitimate　liquidate
171:5

168:11 169:4,5,17　124:21　lenaya    1:19 4:5　liquidated 88:2
170:13 171:7　lamp 126:8,20　188:6,21　list 7:17 53:6
172:16,19 173:7　127:16,20 179:14　20:20 21:7
lenders　64:22 87:6 90:4
173:20,25 175:5　179:15,24　lengthy
58:24　107:4 154:4
176:2 177:3,7　land 113:16　letter 31:16,22　155:19,20 157:24
179:11 181:8,9,11　language 114:23　32:5 43:12 75:13　159:23 172:7
181:22 182:5,12　large   30:20 59:8　76:3　173:4
182:18,20,21　78:5　level 53:12 72:25　listed 12:3 72:19
184:7,18　2:5 4:18
aura　94:14 149:23　108:12 111:25
knowing 29:4　6:12 103:3,6　રેતે રહ્યારે રહ્યા હતા. આ ગામના પાકની ખેતી કરવામાં આવે છે. આ ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી ખેતી કરવામાં આવેલું એક  ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી ખેતી કરવામાં આવેલું એક
levels　114:14 122:12
knowledge 12:15　law 22:13 39:18　liabilities 30:23　128:3
12:19 41:3 59:9　112:15 134:7　94:3 111:17　listen
124:7
62:17 63:3.4　lawyer 43:18 46:8　164:10,12　listened
123:15
91:10 102:10　86:20 102:17　liability 157:5,6　108:13
listing
121:15 122:7　113:25 138:20　life
169:23　160:23
123:17,20,22　139:14 178:23　likelihood
82:4　litigation
19:6
126:9 127:20　lawyer's
40:7　limitations 111:15　22:4,7,11,11 40:6
128:7,21 133:20　lawyers 22:20　limited 5:17 90:7　77:9881:25 82:5
140:12 152:10,20　25:12,14,16 39:21　163:9 178:17　85:19 88:2 127:23
154:9 158:3　51:17 82:18 95:5　line   5:13 44:18,18　128:15,17 170:19
172:21 174:18　96:23 102:7 110:8　61:15,20 63:11,18　170:25 175:14
184:15　125:17 126:2　64:12 66:12 68:5　178:18
47:14
knows　128:6 132:24　68:16 73:15,19　little
14:19 16:25
kwok
1:5 2:9 3:19　136:16 139:14　80:16,21 82:7　21:25 24:3 46:17
5:5 11:6 25:21,24　150:20 155:23　83:6,19 84:11,24　89:12,12
32:16 35:9 94:4　158:3 159:2　85:17,22 86:2,6　146:22 150:18
live
102:6,23 103:14　170:18 172:22　87:7,21 88:15,20　lives
118:15
104:9 111:18　174:6　89:16,19 91:5　149:16,22
119:24 122:16　lead 51:5　92:19 94:14,16,22　living 114:8
129:2 138:23　learn 30:5,7　95:3,7,13,15 96:2　129:22 133:15
139:2 140:8 143:2　leave
152:24,25　96:16,21 97:11　134:9 136:17
147:17　leaving 41:11　99:12 103:12,13　140:13 153:17
kwok's
30:3　102:7 144:4
left　111:19 132:7　159:8 183:3,11,12
119:10 145:17　legal 2:22 101:8　136:19,25 137:13　184:5
-　105:9 106:6　146:12 152:4　llc 2:12 75:24
5:21 6:5 23:16
-　113:15 114:7,25　159:14,15 163:6　126:21
153:8　163:19　llp 1:18 2:3,4,8
186:2　legally 76:2　lines 95:19 104:4　3:24
lack
63:5　168:14　126:18　llp's
10:24
119:7,10
lady

[loan - massachusetts]

loan
63:23 64:2　lowey
1:15 7:9　lynch
1:19 4:5　major
19:3 67:2

65:11,15,19,22,25　10:25 13:24 15:16　188:6,21　89:15
66:6,15 68:2　17:12 18:22,25　m　makenzie
2:6 4:24
70:16　20:6,10,15 21:16　macdonald
49:19　34:21 146:7
loans
64:5,10 66:3　21:21 22:24 23:6　maid
118:8 145:4　making
73:11
located
3:24 101:5　23:18,25 24:17　145:4 158:24　101:14 102:3
113:19　25:7 26:3 30:13　maids
145:4　113:3 153:7
location
123:21　31:15 36:8,18　mail
26:9,13,13　167:13 184:10,16
lodge
101:17　37:3,24 38:21　30:19 32:17 34:3　manager
50:8,13
long
15:5 137:18　39:4,17 43:7 48:8　35:11,19 37:18　managers
50:16
139:15 160:20　48:20 49:4,18　38:6 39:7,9 41:17　51:19
165:22　50:2,15,20 56:19　managing
51:4
look
31:25 35:15　57:2 58:15,21　104:24 106:9　70:16
40:8 48:11 82:16　59:15,25 61:15,19　129:9,10,15,17,24　mandarin
57:18
111:23 152:15　64:12 65:9,13　130:11 131:15　174:20
174:7 178:13　66:10 67:13,24　139:23 141:2　mar
122:13 124:4
looked
13:22 70:7　71:12,18 72:17　147:9 151:13　124:21
133:16 136:14　73:19 76:10,25　152:9 160:18　march
23:22 45:8
163:21 173:22,25　78:16 80:20 82:4　162:19 169:4　72:10,10 73:6
174:8 181:21　83:5 84:17,22　173:15 180:10,19　122:25 134:15
looking
14:3 22:14　85:25 87:20,23　181:25 182:2,4　137:22 155:17,18
22:16 69:17　93:3 94:6,10 95:3　187:6,7,11,12,13　156:16,18
136:17 142:15　96:20 97:10,16　187:14　mark
7:6 35:7
154:22 162:20　98:6 99:5 100:8　mails
13:11,23　131:9
172:4 175:18,23　101:13 102:3　14:2,4 15:20 27:9　marked
10:16
175:24　109:6,11 112:16　27:10 49:22 59:11　32:13,18 35:12
looks
107:5 132:5　112:17,20 122:15　99:19 104:23　47:24 48:2 93:12
loose
132:7　124:9 125:22　112:24 163:8
180:8,22 181:21　93:14 111:4,8
lose
75:19　128:10 135:20　main
2:13 25:2,3　128:24 129:11
losses
78:12　136:22 144:21　163:12　131:7,16,20
lot
42:10 47:11　149:11 163:17　maine
176:17,23　139:24 140:7
68:18 69:24　lowey's
12:15,22　maintain
17:25　147:10,15
104:25 112:13,14　44:13 55:15 67:9　54:3 91:7 92:10　markedly
41:20
122:3 127:8　106:3 111:20　maintained　marking
10:13
168:23,24 178:18　112:8 134:21　156:21　marriage
188:15
lots
99:13,14　135:16 140:23　married
142:25
106:21 113:10　lp
4:20　maintaining
63:19
64:16 91:5　mary
13:8 31:24
167:19 169:21　lunch
123:4　maintenance　49:16 56:4,24
178:2,2　luxury
115:16,23　107:8 144:22　112:17
low
53:12　116:13　massachusetts
6:9
145:6 158:23　176:13,16,22

[materialize - monthly]

materialize 52:7　meeting 16:16,17　met 6:11 16:13,18　mitchell 25:17,20

materializes
60:12　45:14,15 46:16,25　16:19 30:18 58:15　25:25 26:10 31:4
150:19
materials　47:13 51:15 69:5　125:15,16　31:8 32:9 56:18
matt 45:6,15 46:9　116:2 123:15　method
152:22　57:4 59:4,4,18
49:15,15 50:4,7　126:13 127:10　methodology　99:3,8 102:11
56:24 112:17　meetings 46:19　111:15　103:17 104:12,16
129:18,19 154:4　47:12　mezzanine
167:23　105:4,13 106:7
160:17 181:18　melissa 25:18,23　microphone
3:11　109:24 112:15
matter 1:16 3:18　26:2,10 30:2,6　165:2　124:2 129:18
6:23 20:8 41:9　31:4,8 32:9 56:16　microphones 3:6　135:23 139:8
43:8 46:4 49:17　56:17 57:3 59:3,4　middle
113:14　143:14 156:3
50:21 51:6 53:12　59:10,17 99:2,7　midnight 162:14　157:16 181:5
67:13 76:5 81:25　102:11,18 103:17　million 126:8　148:4
mk
90:9 115:25 129:2　104:11,15 105:4　154:13 164:12　moment 62:24
145:6 147:17　105:13 106:7　miltenberger 2:19　153:12
151:23 160:25　109:25 110:18　5:14,16 28:13,14　monetize
120:24
174:10 188:17　112:15 124:2　29:23 41:7,15　54:21
money
matters 7:2 14:2　129:19 135:23　miltenberger's　62:14 78:4 134:18
40:2 88:22 98:20　139:8 143:13　29:21　153:24 177:4
13:7 56:4
matthew　148:3 152:12　mind 27:14 34:18　monies
136:6
mcdonald
15:18　156:2 157:16　34:24 36:20 87:5　monitor
92:14
131:2
mckenzie　160:16 174:5　99:20 164:21　monitoring 91:13
meals
141:9,10　180:9,17 182:3　mindy
50:5　72:15
month
144:15　member
55:7　46:8
mine　118:21 161:7
mean 17:16 21:9　172:12　minimum 32:8　184:2
39:24 44:23 60:14　membership　67:7 77:14 128:6　monthly 45:6
83:12 86:8 87:9　122:13,17 124:5　161:7
minor　46:11 51:12 67:8
96:11 110:4　113:12
memories　minute 11:13 33:3　68:7,11,18,23 69:7
116:14 130:19　memory 66:2,9　147:24　69:10,12 70:2,15
138:14 149:2　115:22 127:8,9　14:20
minutes　70:18 71:2,3,8,13
175:14 177:19　141:20 159:17　89:11　72:3,20 105:21
means 8:3 82:14　menial 170:2,7　minutiae 89:14　106:12,16 107:14
144:3 151:2　mentioned 14:15　miscommunicati　107:22,25 108:20
meant 22:7 63:12　15:15 18:4 19:24　135:4　116:22 117:14,16
159:12　22:23 24:11 25:23　missed 23:11　118:11 122:16,21
media 3:16 120:19　29:25 49:14,19　missing 32:2 81:9　123:7 124:6,11
120:23,24　54:14 57:3,14　110:15　125:5,16 130:14
mediation 171:3　60:13 73:22 87:8　159:24
mistake　130:21 132:2,25
medications 10:4　92:4 100:7 126:16　misunderstood　134:9,24 135:10
16:15 45:22
meet　165:18　56:22　147:8 148:7,16,24
72:5　149:3,24 151:25

[monthly - objection]

154:20 155:12,15　116:4 138:10　115:25 116:15　136:12 141:17

157:11,19 160:4,8　173:4,8,23 174:9　146:22 156:13　145:2 153:6
160:24 161:11,16　182:6,14　173:18 176:14,16　158:15
161:17,23 162:2　named
119:7　176:23 188:3,7　numerous 44:5
163:5,13,20 168:9　136:22
names　14:22
night　59:11 101:3
169:7,11 184:19　107:12
natural　78:7
nol's　112:24
months
72:7　nature
52:21　nonsense 162:11　5:16
ny
161:25 183:20　168:13 183:16　normal
8:17 77:19　0
mor 72:11 108:14　136:3
nearly　179:3
137:22　necessarily 83:24　normally 109:15　23:16 78:11

mor's
170:6　necessary 12:20　notary 1:19 5:23　186:2
morning 3:3 6:10　63:21 75:25 80:18　186:22 188:6　o'melveny 1:17
14:20,22　85:18 93:2 100:23　note 3:5 29:20　2:3 3:24 4:19,22
mortgage 77:19　112:7 169:21　35:24 41:11　4:25 6:13 13:18
mother
118:17　8:23 9:9
need　145:19　100:5 103:7
motion
14:9 28:25　36:14 37:11,20　noted 29:18　4:7 7:25
oath
38:15,20 89:7　40:12,15,23 42:10　14:6,7,7
notes　object 129:25
90:10,16 168:6　47:4 85:9 124:19　51:10,11 100:9,13　objected 30:20
6:24
motions　127:4 143:3 156:9　100:14,19 101:3　objecting
80:19
181:12　163:14 166:20,23　111:7,14,24　12:4,24
objection
motor 119:5　169:18 170:10,15　112:12 113:4　24:20 26:16 27:15
motorcycles　171:14　121:6 148:4　28:24 29:22 34:10
115:17　needed 30:22,25　187:10　37:16 39:5 57:22
75:14
move　44:2 46:7 174:4　notice 6:22,25 7:5　58:18 61:4 64:14
moving 34:24 57:2　needing 166:10,13　7:12 10:15,24　66:13 77:4 78:21
42:22,22
multi　167:6
needs　89:10 187:5　79:22 81:10,12
multiple 19:14　169:19　noticing 4:17　84:25 88:3,8 91:9
42:4 76:4　negotiated
31:14　november 127:24　92:2 93:5 95:9
multiplied
136:7　31:15　number 3:22 6:24　96:10 98:15 99:24
multiply 183:25　negotiation
31:18　19:16 30:21 32:16　101:18 102:8
music
120:7,18　65:10　62:6 73:4 81:4,15　103:24 104:13
1:18 2:3
myers　negotiations 171:3　93:19 96:8 100:20　106:18 108:21
3:24 4:19,22,25　neither
58:14　110:19,20 132:22　111:22 112:22
6:13　net   19:10,24 78:11　133:16,20 134:19　113:24 118:4
n　netherland 114:17　135:13,18 146:20　122:18 126:3
115:2　150:9,10 152:14　127:7 130:16
2:278:11 186:2
n　never 57:6 121:23　159:14,15 181:21　132:11 133:18
187:17　1:18,18,21 2:5
new　183:22 187:4　141:18 148:20
name 4:2 6:3,11　2:5,10,10,18 3:25　numbering 97:7　149:7 152:11
20:5 23:12,13,15　3:25 5:23 58:8　numbers 48:23　157:20 166:12,22
23:16 27:20 28:22　79:15,16 115:8,10　97:5 135:21　170:12,22 177:25
29:5 58:12 102:18
[objections - paragraph]

objections
4:14　108:20,23 137:20　oral 65:18 99:17　7:8 11:8,21
page

12:8 14:10 52:20　170:24 178:18　99:18　33:2,4 48:22,23,24
52:22 54:8　open 47:13 91:7　orally 106:9　49:9,11 55:13,18
9:18
objects　92:10　160:18　88:20 93:25 95:18
obligation 91:22　opening 63:19　order 29:15 62:11　96:4,25 97:4,8
observer 45:20　64:16 91:5　72:23 75:3,5,8　105:18,20 106:11
obtain
12:19　operating 41:21　86:9,21 105:5　113:13,14 115:12
obtained 59:17　41:24,25 42:11,20　54:25
ordered　119:9,12,20 120:3
22:15
obtaining　42:21 43:3 45:7　ordinarily 172:5　121:3 124:25
obviously 43:18　46:11 51:12 67:8　ordinary 30:21　126:5,10 132:7
66:18 87:17 98:17　68:7,11,19,23　62:7 70:24 156:7　140:19 145:20
105:8 156:21　69:10,12 70:3,6,10　156:8 167:18　148:3 149:15
163:15 173:21　70:15,18 71:2,4,8　169:22 181:7　151:14 152:8
174:17
occasion　71:13 72:4,21　original
150:10　157:6 161:19,20
occasionally　78:12 106:12,16　152:3 159:20　161:20 162:3
141:22,24　107:22 108:2　153:13
originally　187:3,18
113:19
occupancy　116:22 117:14,16　4.9
outcome　pages 161:19,22
113:22　118:11 122:16,22　188:16　162:11
occur
68:3　123:8 124:6　outside 16:22 26:3　paid 32:24 70:23
offer
18:25　130:15,21 132:2　26:5,6,14 31:5　72:14 73:13 77:25
office
19:16 58:8　132:25 134:4,5,9　80:4 126:10　86:16 108:10,15
68:24 69:20 72:12　134:24 135:11　127:17　118:22 130:24
72:22 162:13　147:8 149:25　outstanding 59:24　133:3 134:16
offices
1:17　151:25 154:20　overpayment　136:7 149:18
official 93:13,25　155:12,15 156:10　160:6　151:15 152:21
94:21 187:9　157:11,19 160:5,8　owed 81:18,19,20　153:24 155:23
offset
78:7　160:25 161:11,16　114:3
owned　156:11 158:8
oh
45:10 160:24　161:17,23 162:2　126:22,25 127:16　159:19 160:2,3
167:9 173:2　163:5,13,20 168:9　154:8　173:6 175:4,8,10
177:14　169:7,12 184:19　ownership
102:12　175:19 179:24
okay 9:7 35:17,22　operations 127:20　107:9　181:10,12 183:4,6
71:17 85:17 96:3　opinion 145:20　owns 115:5 116:5　183:8,14
103:2 131:11　151:5,7　p　122:14
palm
148:2 149:14　opportunity 2:4　2:2,2 23:16　pans
101:23
159:6 173:8 181:6　4:20 6:14 10:24　p
69:20
p&l　paper 168:23
169:3
old　38:20 75:20 81:4　1:15 2:17　papers 43:17,19
once 85:11 144:24　29:6
oppose　p.c.
p.m. 39:10 90:25　44:16 45:3 46:3,6
154:10　opposed 74:6　139:21 140:4　126:14
ones 60:9 69:23　103:14　165:8,12 185:5,8　paragraph
113:2
ongoing 52:6　opposite
159:24　pacific 2:3 4:19　113:2
88:14 105:21　6:13 10:23
[paramount - plan]

paramount
29:3　pass
44:9 130:25　people
5:15 16:2　139:9,11,12

parcel
111:25　139:10　19:8,17,19 28:19　140:24 157:17
parents
42:3　passed
105:7,8　45:22 53:4 58:24　178:20 179:3
part
21:22 37:17　patents
120:4,13　102:17 117:24　181:23,24 182:2
43:17 51:11 69:9　pax
100:6　118:7 141:24　183:9,10 184:4
96:9,12,17 97:9,13　pay
19:13 54:22　142:2,4 168:24　person's
27:23
97:24 100:12　55:3 68:2 118:20　175:16　182:5
105:20 111:25　154:9 171:6　percent
118:13　personal
95:12
112:3 132:21　payable
69:21　138:19,21 139:4　97:25 101:4
144:7 170:21　payables
167:24　141:9,11,13,14　102:10
171:7,9 172:4　payee
138:11　142:7,8,9,12,16,23　personally
23:9
181:6　payees
137:7　143:6,8 144:2,5,6　65:17
participate
47:2　paying
107:17　144:13,14 145:11　perspective
31:23
47:17 60:8,12　146:24　146:4,5,11,11,21　77:16 85:7
participated
51:13　payment
33:17　percentage
136:6　pertaining
146:21
58:23 84:3　92:22 106:23　136:8 138:13　petition
32:22
participating　108:22 117:9　139:5 147:7　33:5,9,16,20 35:24
45:21　133:3,25 134:11　percentages　36:3,8 74:13 84:6
participation　146:19 154:7,13　136:15 144:19　92:22 132:19
45:12 47:10,20　154:15 156:24　perform
59:15　133:3,3,25 160:2,2
particular
40:5,12　159:17 175:13　66:11 91:25 93:3　160:3,3 172:5,20
40:16 42:19 105:5　179:4　96:20 97:10,16,21　174:25 176:5,8
117:17 118:6,23　payments
83:22　98:5,6 114:13　177:18,24 183:4
130:17 168:25　84:6 86:16 93:2　125:22　183:11,14,16
particularly
14:9　132:16,19 133:7,9　performed
80:20　184:5,12
112:12　133:10 134:2,6,16　83:5 88:10 89:18　phone
15:3 25:11
parties
3:14 66:22　134:22 154:5　97:20 121:10,14　25:15 28:8 47:20
84:23 87:12　156:25 157:24　period
72:10　58:24 59:2,11
104:25 105:2　172:5 183:17,17　82:16 86:20 90:25　104:24 143:15
117:6 130:24　184:11　117:18 129:22　167:8 181:19
133:12 188:14　payroll
42:7　133:11 140:13　phones
3:10
partner
19:12　pays
122:4　151:15 153:25　phrase
110:2
20:3 51:3　pc
10:25 48:9,20　154:20 155:11,17　physically
123:5
partnership
74:10　49:4　156:12 157:25　pick
3:7
75:23　pdf
95:18　159:9　place
3:10,14
parts
79:12　pearl
2:18　perjury
8:8　45:22 47:15 53:8
party
4:7 20:22　penalty
8:8　person
5:12,15　77:6 82:20 83:25
44:4 53:10 99:11　pendency
70:9　15:18,21 26:15,17　175:24 186:11
102:14 119:24　117:19　49:20 50:17 51:5　plan
86:6,11,13,24
122:6 173:12　pending
9:11　54:4 103:15　87:15,24 122:2
184:10　81:25 82:5　129:18 130:10,10　169:17

[planned - process]

planned 54:19　120:17　prepare
13:4　previously 6:10

86:14 88:7
plans　possibly
118:4　24:13,14 71:11,12　14:23 85:20
125:3　169:6 171:17　71:23 95:3 100:9　104:10 119:18
platforms
120:8　post 20:17 32:22　173:5　130:4
120:20　33:5,9,16,20 35:24　prepared 13:10,14　primary
143:10
play   52:10 169:18　36:3,8 61:11　24:15 31:19 71:3　principal 21:17
169:20 171:7　63:12 133:3 160:2　71:19 86:12　22:24 23:3 37:23
172:2,3,3　174:25 176:5,8　161:15 173:18　50:5,10,16,25 51:8
plays 52:11　177:18,24 183:11　183:12　printed 119:11
pleadings 14:8　184:5,12　preparer 135:4,6　prior   82:17 83:23
please
3:5,9 4:15　posted 120:8,19　136:9 173:4 174:9　priority
81:7
5:10,19 6:3 8:19　potential 24:10　preparing 8:12　29:2
privacy
9:5,11 11:8 23:14　52:9 65:11,15,22　15:6 45:6,11,12　private
3:7
28:11 33:2 35:15　85:21　46:14 55:24 56:7　privilege 39:23,25
67:22 148:5,14　potentially 27:20　57:24 58:21 60:23　40:17 83:15
165:2　66:678:17 90:14　66:20,21 84:4　privileged 41:3
plus   72:10 106:7,7　101:23
pots　86:18 94:7,11　14:24
probably
135:18 140:17　practice 121:21　105:11 109:6　20:20 24:11 28:9
2:14
po　practitioner　110:12 112:9,21　32:9 42:10 45:4
pohl 23:10,15,17　176:13　132:4 155:3,6　52:15,16,19 54:5
23:24 24:4　pre   74:13 84:6　161:2169:11　106:8,8,9 110:17
point 39:14 40:18　92:22 132:19　170:5,6　116:23 137:8
48:14 52:20 60:6　133:3,25 160:2,3,3　presence 120:25　138:21 144:5
61:8 65:25 67:10　172:5,20 177:18　present 2:21 4:10　170:23 176:19
75:3 81:11 92:20　177:24 183:4,14　presenting 155:13　problem 80:3
106:17 123:23　183:16　presidential
19:19　146:25 160:24
124:13 130:14　precursor
17:11　presumably
54:22　162:16
153:22 166:3　predicated 72:3　68:20　11:3
procedure
171:10　157:10　presuming 114:6　17:19
points 25:2 55:17　predict 53:7,13　presupposed　procedures
7:23
policies 121:17　33:15
prefer　55:10　70:13
policy 121:18,22　preference 33:9　presupposes 70:15　proceed 11:20
121:24 122:8　33:14 82:10,18　presupposing　140:5 165:13
populated 95:23　84:2 171:18　66:14　proceeding 4:15
ported 49:23　preferences 82:16　pretty 21:11 22:9　16:22
37:2
poses　preparation 13:20　32:7 37:4 44:22　proceedings 39:19
possession 37:25　15:7 51:9 53:5　70:5 179:11　39:21,22 115:10
38:3 52:14　55:19 56:20 60:19　previous 36:21　process 38:14
possible 30:17,25　61:9 68:6 73:16　38:6 78:7,10　40:13 67:21 155:9
31:635:25 60:7　86:7 112:4 116:22　116:8 119:6　168:7,22 169:23
79:6 82:9 84:12　168:10　178:11

[produce - reasoning]

produce
8:13　152:16 153:16,25　d　r

produced 128:25　proponent 118:12　31:23
qpc　r   2:2 5:21,21 6:5
137:19 147:16　proposed 5:4,7　quarter   72:8 73:9　48:25 186:2 188:2
173:12,13,16　54:20 111:20　73:10　167:8 176:10
rang
product 46:22　139:3 150:21　quarterly 68:7　15:13
range
83:15,17　protect 75:9 89:16　71:19,21,25 72:18　29:5
rank
profession
166:3　179:4　queries 158:18　rarely 42:21 81:18
professional 17:14　protected
29:14　question    8:20 9:5　rate 67:10,11
17:17,25 18:8,12　protection 83:18　9:7,11,19,20 27:4　reached 23:17,24
33:11 37:22 77:17　protective 29:15　27:6 28:9 34:8,12　28:20 161:12
92:21 156:4 158:3　prove 86:22　34:16,18,19 36:17　162:12,25
163:3 166:7　provide 22:18　36:19,25 38:17　reaching 161:13
175:19,20　92:25 171:11,15　53:17 56:9 83:20　read 27:6 34:12
14:8
professionals　provided 13:14　94:19,21 96:17　57:18 65:24 90:16
30:21 54:9,23　59:5 98:11 99:10　101:12 105:16　120:16 147:25
57:9 62:8 68:25　117:3 130:9　108:3,8 110:7,8　reads 55:18 61:8
77:25 156:5,5,6,7　140:24 158:15　113:14 114:14　63:18 80:17 88:20
156:8 157:2,3　92:21
providers　115:13 116:21　94:20,24 95:11
159:25 175:20　providing 27:14　117:4 118:3 119:4　105:21 106:12
181:8　63:21　120:3,12 121:16　113:18 115:15
profile
166:10,19　public 1:20 5:23　122:11 124:13　ready 137:21
178:14 179:6,18　186:22 188:6　126:5 127:22　real 42:20 77:20
program 69:12　pulling 134:14　130:18,20 148:19　94:22 107:6
70:11　pullman 2:12 5:7　149:6,12,25 150:3　113:19,22 114:2,4
71:9
progress　165:17　151:19,23 154:2　147:6 167:20
progresses 50:22　punching
99:11　155:16 163:10,12　realized 159:24
projections 61:10　punitive
164:9　163:12 166:14　really 31:2 74:21
61:24,24 86:18　117:12
purchase　177:13,21 181:15　133:2 165:4
87:10　118:19　184:10,12　10:8 76:15
reason
prominent 60:18　117:13
purchased　questions 47:17　78:13 89:4 138:22
promised 179:23　purposes
39:23,25　83:21 91:3 99:21　142:4,19 143:4,10
prompted 163:17　77:24　100:6,23 113:5　145:16
proof   80:24 81:2　pursuant 10:25　119:19,21 129:16　reasonable 21:13
81:21　pushed
168:23　135:25 149:2　reasonableness
proofs 80:19　put 44:18 69:16　153:5 158:5　109:14 110:3
properly 136:2　131:12 142:7　164:15 167:17　158:10
property 94:15,21　155:24　179:17 184:8,23　reasonably 53:11
95:12 107:7　87:18
puts　165:4
quick　reasoning 29:21
113:17 114:2　putting 109:14　quickbooks 60:25　142:17 143:21
120:7,13,15,18　180:22　quickly
I રેતે:R　144:8,11 145:10
122:11 148:5,14　145:12,21

[reasons - report]

reasons
75:2 77:23　record
3:3,15 4:13　refers
84:11 95:13　relied
85:5 104:9

130:3 142:11　6:4,11,11 8:12　95:17 96:2 114:16　177:15 178:6
168:15　11:13,15,16,20　119:4 120:5,12　relief
75:4,6
recall
23:20 32:6　28:2,18 32:15　121:4,17 122:13　relies
84:22
33:8 34:7 44:10　41:10 48:5 90:19　125:8 126:6,7　rely
39:2 98:13
57:21 65:20　90:21 91:2 93:18　127:23 135:13　123:25 139:6
126:17 128:4　100:4 129:5 130:4　144:20　158:14 176:4
146:10,13 151:4　139:19,21 140:4　reflect
132:10　177:23 179:5
151:10 161:9　156:9 165:4,8,9,12　133:8 140:22　remain
106:16,24
173:22　185:2,5 188:11　reflected
133:14　107:18
receipt
78:13　recorded
1:14　135:15 152:8　remains
74:12
receipts
52:17　3:17　reflecting
164:5　184:14
54:3,14,15 63:15　recording
3:13　refresh
36:16　remember
21:14
66:25 68:22 86:19　8:10　regarding
15:17　24:7 43:14,24
receivable
69:22　records
15:9,20,23　16:4,4 24:2,9 25:5　59:2 62:22 81:3
receive
57:15　40:14 49:22 52:16　26:4,11 30:14　85:24 87:5 105:2
137:10 157:15　82:9 84:12,14,18　59:21 65:14,19　105:5,15 108:7
174:24　92:19 160:22　67:25 102:15　109:20 110:8
received
33:20　171:16,20 172:17　111:16 137:13　116:19 117:4
92:22 99:17　recoverable
83:2　150:3 161:10　127:19 130:22
104:11 137:13　recoveries
175:15　163:4　142:13 146:16
139:7 140:6　rectified
135:5　regret
168:2　159:13 167:12
160:10　redacted
129:17　rejoin
41:14　173:10 176:7
receiving
33:9　182:6,16,25　related
4:7 19:7　remind
167:10
161:9　redaction
130:6　49:21 56:9 61:10　remotely
4:11
recess
90:22　refer
97:4,25　90:3 91:4 95:14　renters
107:7
139:22　referenced
68:10　138:23 143:5,11　reorganization
recognize
10:20　103:11,12,13　188:14　86:11 168:21
48:15 49:6 93:21　119:23 155:5　relates
7:3,8 94:15　169:15
111:11 140:9　159:10,15　107:16 111:21　repair
107:8
147:20,22　references
63:11　173:16　144:22
recollection
36:16　113:4,7 119:6　relating
6:23　repairs
158:22
44:21 162:24　referencing
65:7　70:14　repeat
9:5 27:3
recommend
73:23　referred
27:5　relationship　repeating
66:17
73:24 74:2 75:7　174:5　143:19　report
40:11 45:7
75:17,22 76:11　referring
71:15　relevance
28:21　46:11 51:12 54:6
80:9 141:10　95:20 97:4,7,14　88:11　67:8 68:11,19,23
recommended　104:3 120:9　relevant
27:24　69:7,10,13 70:3,6
144:21　132:12 135:9　41:4 113:23　70:10,15,19 71:2,4
reconciling
80:18　150:6 167:16　116:21 117:14　71:9,19,21,25 72:4
123:11　72:18,21 107:22

[report - right]

108:2,2,9 117:5,15　representations　responds
52:4　55:13 61:8 88:12

118:11 122:16,22　59:21　149:15　111:21 126:14
123:8 124:6　representative　response
35:23　175:22
130:15,21 132:3　180:5　115:14　retrieved
31:8,12
132:25 134:4,6,24　represented
9:12　responses
12:7　return
53:2,3
135:11 144:9　20:21 21:10,12　responsibilities　74:23 75:6,8
147:8 149:25　102:22 113:12　21:20 46:10,18　76:12,14 77:2,22
151:25 154:20　representing
9:16　responsible
20:2　77:23 78:14 79:15
155:12,15 156:10　100:5 181:13　98:12　79:17,18 86:23
157:12,23,23　request
26:19　responsive
124:15　168:9 173:5
158:13 159:8,20　108:9 163:18　rest
17:24　returns
54:10 74:3
160:5,8,25 161:11　require
47:9 60:7　restrictions
153:2　74:9 75:24 76:5,6
161:16,17 163:5　required
12:14,19　restroom
139:17　78:18 79:9,11
163:13 184:20　17:19,22 54:25　restructure　80:10 169:9 173:3
reported
71:2　55:2 70:10 76:2　167:22　173:6,11,18
157:5 160:7　89:5 108:14　restructured　revealed
26:18
reporter
1:20 4:4　requirement
67:7　170:16,21　revealing
27:19
5:10,19 8:11　requirements　restructuring　28:22
10:13,18 27:7　42:24,24 67:5　17:24 18:7 165:19　revenue
80:14
32:12,20 35:7,14　requires
68:24　166:11,13,16,20　review
27:22
47:23 48:4 78:9　86:25 89:10　166:24 167:7,16　43:22 51:23 52:19
93:11,16 111:3,10　reside
150:15　167:21 170:11,21　53:10 60:7 61:9
128:23 129:13　172:17　resuming
139:23　62:12 68:6 72:17
131:18,19 140:2　residence
101:5,9　retain
48:8,19　73:16 124:20
147:12,14 171:13　102:5 113:16　49:3 181:7　125:17 135:24
187:15　114:6,9 118:6,10　retained
34:6　150:19 158:2
reporting
19:18　150:13　36:22 37:6 39:7　162:5 171:19
42:23 52:18 54:2　residences
19:14　39:15,18,20 72:17　reviewed
13:8,11
66:21 67:4 68:8　114:14 118:3　143:11 187:15　62:18,20 81:24
108:14 148:24　resident
76:12　retainer
32:22,24　84:13,18 109:13
149:3 155:6,10　resides
114:5　32:25 33:5,10,12　110:3 112:24
reports
22:19　118:5　33:16,20 35:24　114:21 141:3
66:21 68:7 107:22　respect
21:20　36:4,8 126:6　reviewing
80:17
116:22 117:16　92:25 95:7　174:25 175:17　82:8 112:11
157:19 161:23　respond
89:11　176:5,8 177:19,24　160:15 171:16
162:3 168:9 169:7　178:24,24　retaining
34:5　revising
139:5
169:12　responded
36:20　35:21 36:18 37:3　rhode
176:15,21
represent
30:2　65:4　39:4　right
7:10 10:19
129:7 140:16　responding
35:18　retains
74:7 162:6　38:19 53:24 55:22
144:13 176:17,19　51:16　retention
7:8　61:3 62:16 63:6
43:16,17,19 44:16　64:16 70:17 71:6

[right - server]

73:4 81:15 84:9　178:7 181:3,5　124:25 128:3　142:20,24 143:3,5

90:7 94:8 95:21　rudnick's 126:14　135:5,7,9 136:10　143:10,23 159:14
98:2 100:11　10:25 11:22
rule　155:25　184:3
126:19 130:11　11:2117:5
rules　scheduled
81:14　11:23 28:21
see
134:12 136:19　161:3　schedules
14:6　33:6 35:25 45:22
138:5 152:5　ruling 29:12　30:23 44:22 45:25　57:19 61:12 68:8
153:17,20 154:22　22:258:9
run　51:10 55:20,25　82:11,25 88:11
165:20 169:16　67:10.11 178:21　56:14 57:12,17,25　95:17 96:6 121:8
170:8 173:23　running 21:23　58:17,22 60:20,24　121:19 125:6
177:14　172:9,10　69:4 100:10　132:15 141:2
rights
29:2　178:22
runs　111:16 112:2,5　148:9 151:16
113:20
road　2:6 4:24,24
russo　113:6 168:8　155:21 159:2,3
rodeo
89:3　S　183:13　168:5 183:20
role
50:7,12 52:9　2:274:10 187:2　schindler 13:8　seeing 57:21
53:18 94:6,10　S　31:25 49:16 50:9　127:19
98:11 102:3　safe
123:10　56:5,24 112:18　124:10,12
seek
105:25 106:3　safety
138:24　school 17:3.5　79:8,12
seen
112:9 134:21　144:10 182:11　science
17:7　109:15 121:23
168:11 169:17,20　42:7
sales　scope 43:8 44:12　127:24 128:19
171:25 172:4　sanity 158:9　90:13 171:9　137:6 145:7 164:8
roles 23:2 51:18　162:4
save　164:22
scotch　164:13
157:4
roll　62:22 79:13
SAW　scrambling 69:4　select 75:20
rolled
158:15　79:15 126:13　71:11
scratch　122:6
sell
4:11 127:12
room　128:4 153:4　99:16 106:2　semantics 39:13
rudnick 2:8 5:4　159:23 162:19　search
15:19,20　19:19
senators
15:21 23:10,16　163:13 173:3　49:21 82-25　15:21 24:15
send
24:6,8,18 25:9　saying 37:9 149:20
149:21 162:13　second 45:16 61:7　162:7
26:5,6,11 30:9　114:16 121:6　sense 38:2 158:4
31:20 32:4 38:10　33:4 34:15
says
87:7 91:23 116:6　125:2　158:25
38:12 39:2,16　secret
106:21　sensitive
3:6
43:23 49:24 56:13　116:7 162:7,15　120:14
secrets　sent 13:17 31:20
57:4 58:25 59:7　184:9,10　section
75:5 97:17　49:24
59:10,17 64:20　scared 143:16,18
143:19　105:23 106:4　121:6
sentence
83:18 98:25 99:7　20:14　114:19　125:2
102:12,18 103:18　scenarios
59:22
schedule　secure 167:22　separate 74:4,5,14
103:18 104:11,17　60:3 71:14 81:14　secured 20:19　74:22 107:21
104:17 105:7,13　21:7 42:15 81:7　129:5 131:7 132:7
106:6 109:24　94:7,20,23 95:12　security 33:17　september 17:10
112:14 124:2　96:13 98:23 103:9
103:23 104:8　115:24 118:8,25　7:5
served
126:7 139:7 156:2　133:23 138:16,22　13:24 49:22
server
157:15 175:18　108:12 109:16,17　138:24 142:14,18
109:18 114:2

[service - started]

service
92:21　signature
188:21　someday
169:17　spent
21:23

138:11 145:5,5　signer
37:24 52:14　someone's
171:4　split
118:18
services
18:24　65:3　someplace
110:21　spoke
13:5,7 14:15
21:21 85:21 90:4　significant
13:9　son
58:9,11,13　14:21 16:8 31:2
set
101:7 161:8　59:5　soon
159:4　57:6
188:10,19　significantly　sorry
3:5 7:14　spoken
14:24
setting
47:5 83:17　160:14　23:11 35:3 41:7　174:11,18,22
settlement
78:6　silverberg
13:6　83:11 94:19 95:16　spouse
118:14
171:2　24:5 33:4 34:4　126:4 130:19　145:18 150:14
settlements
77:10　37:2 38:5 39:6　171:13 176:11　spouse's
121:18
seven
75:15　silverberg's
35:19　sort
52:8 55:6　spreads
21:25
136:18　similar
113:17　sorts
17:15 42:23　spreadsheet
seventh
92:19　simultaneously　54:15 167:25　135:14 158:6
shake
8:24　44:23　sound
84:9　160:19
shape
62:10　single
53:10 75:22　source
62:24　spring
2:17 5:16
shapes
42:2　sir
85:16 100:6,14　77:12 87:25 105:2　27:17,18 28:17,23
shea
2:17　153:18　175:7,8,13,25　29:6 57:24 58:3
sheet
69:20 131:14　sitting
19:25　spatulas
101:22　179:6,9,12 180:6,7
133:15 138:16　situation
104:20　speak
14:18 15:14　180:10,15,20
158:12　121:23　23:25 24:9,17　181:17,20 182:20
sheets
109:4　six
162:10　25:5,10 26:2　183:5,8 184:6
sherry
114:17,25　size
42:2　44:17 144:25　spring's
28:8
146:21,25 150:5　slipping
87:4　174:20,21 181:24　182:10,15,19
150:16,17 151:16　small
45:12 88:5　speaking
35:20　springs
26:19
153:20 154:11　134:17 173:17　115:7,14 151:10　28:10,14
sherry's
146:25　social
120:23,24　specific
14:7 51:11　square
1:18 2:4,9
shit
176:11　sofa
55:25 56:14　94:17 100:12,14　3:25
short
104:20　57:12,17,24 58:16　100:19 101:2　ss
188:4
139:22　58:22 59:22 60:2　104:4 110:24　stab
43:22
shorthand
1:20　94:7 98:23 109:16　111:19 112:12,20　staff
20:4 24:12
show
146:9　sofa's
14:5 44:21　157:25　51:17 52:8,9,24
showed
141:24　45:25 51:10 60:19　specifically
20:25　53:14,17,20 54:4,7
159:22　60:19,23 69:4　43:15 51:7 72:20　66:20
showing
101:19　83:22 112:2 113:5　specifics
83:10,16　stamp
129:2
shown
132:21　168:8 170:5　specified
186:11　stamped
35:9
147:7　software
60:16,18　speculate
127:4　standard
70:8
shows
117:20　61:2,5　speculation
93:6　121:21
158:5,21,23　sole
52:14　spell
23:12,13　start
6:17 7:22
siblings
42:4　solely
104:9　spend
15:5 78:4　79:25
signatory
38:23　somebody
183:7　165:25　started
17:11 23:4
66:18　45:6 153:4,7

[started - team]

162:18 182:21　stricken
29:14　supported
36:21　77:6 82:20 111:23

starting
33:14　strike
25:4 30:6　supporting
51:17　134:17 139:18
83:25 97:9 109:5　116:20 157:13　supports
60:18　165:3 173:2
130:14　structured
65:23　supposed
74:20　179:25 184:25
starts
96:17　66:7　162:17 167:12　taken
79:4 90:23
109:21　stub
72:9　sure
7:4,11,23　139:23
state
1:20 4:12,15　stuff
30:25 168:7　27:16 31:24 32:2　takes
47:15
5:23 6:3 27:2　subject
8:7 12:11　32:7 37:4 38:12　talk
7:20 8:18 17:2
42:22 73:17 76:16　14:2 29:14 53:10　38:13 43:13,21　80:7 146:3
76:16 79:14 101:3　147:23　44:19 73:4 75:10　talked
16:3 21:18
156:5 188:3,7　subscribed
186:18　81:8 88:13 99:22　30:10,15 46:2,9,13
stated
26:17　substantively　104:6 110:13,14　55:14 59:9 127:9
164:10 171:19　149:5　110:16 113:3,8,11　128:12,16 129:20
statement
14:5　subtract
133:6　124:8 125:25　134:10 137:24
34:12 37:21 54:6　success
82:5　127:14 129:6　154:25 158:16
55:19 73:6 111:17　successful
86:10　135:25 136:10　164:3
112:4 158:8　suffering
9:24　137:16 141:5　talking
29:25
statements
8:25　sufficient
42:12　150:25 158:4,11　64:15 79:23 85:2
69:19 111:14　suggested
143:6　165:6 167:13　96:12 98:25 103:8
states
1:2 3:19　suggesting
142:12　173:25 174:23　104:4 138:19
42:6 54:23 62:5　142:17　176:7 179:11　146:13 160:16,16
69:11,19 71:20　suggestion
145:24　surprise
83:24　160:17 162:18
72:2,22 157:7　suggestions
141:3　surrounding　task
89:4
162:8 171:11　141:8　182:12　tasks
88:22 170:2
176:19　suite
2:18 6:8　suspect
170:25　170:7
statistical
94:3　sum
72:11 96:17　swear
5:10,19　tax
19:21,22 52:25
statute
75:16　135:17　swearing
8:4　53:3,4 54:8,9
82:22　summarized　sworn
5:22 186:5　73:17 74:3,8 75:6
statutes
75:16　155:24　186:18 188:10　75:7,24 76:14
statutorily
72:24　summary
94:2　system
60:10　77:2,16,22,24 78:3
stay
18:2 123:9,13　129:21 130:9　t　78:17 79:9,11
stays
123:8　153:3　t
5:21 6:5 186:2　80:8,10 168:9
step
13:19 46:2　sun
59:14　187:2 188:2,2　169:9 173:3,5,6,11
69:25　supplement　tab
10:12 32:11　173:18
stepping
49:13　132:24　34:22 131:2 146:7　taxation
19:9 22:2
steven
23:9,15,24　support
19:6 22:4　table
49:9,10 50:4　taxes
42:7,7 53:5
24:4　22:8 40:6 49:2　taconic
113:20　73:24 74:17 77:20
street
2:13,18 6:8　51:24,24 55:21　tail
45:4　107:6
stretto
89:22 90:8　85:19 112:6　take
3:13 9:10　taxing
75:11
90:14 92:5,10,14　162:21 172:8　14:25 31:25 33:3　team
55:7 56:20
92:24　35:15 53:8 67:5　59:10 106:6,6

[team - top]

109:24 110:16　thing 19:17 64:19　172:11 173:16,17　44:24 45:19 52:20

138:19,20 153:13　66:3 79:13 117:23　177:12 178:16,16　60:6 65:25 81:11
172:9,12　120:10 122:14　178:17 179:3　86:17,20 90:20,24
technical 56:9　124:21 135:12　181:19 182:22　97:3 104:21 106:8
technically
74:22　157:2 162:15　183:21 184:20　116:13 117:18
technology 169:6　things 6:21 22:5　thinking 40:8　118:23 123:24
teleconference　51:21 54:18 69:14　117:7 123:12　136:13 137:11
2:19　100:24 124:4　149:9　138:2 139:20
telephone 45:15　156:22 161:2　third 63:18 64:15　140:3 146:23
tell
124:19,24　167:19 179:2　117:6 119:24　154:5 155:20
127:3 135:8　think 9:14 14:11　122:6 130:24　156:14,22 157:11
154:14 184:15　14:12 16:17 18:15　133:12 184:10　157:25 159:25
telling 118:21　19:8 20:20 21:9　184:2
thirds　160:14,15,21
7:17 15:11
ten　24:13 28:25 30:16　thought 37:12　162:6 165:7,11
85:3,3,4
tense　30:20 31:2,5 34:6　38:18 46:25 56:21　174:2,10 178:25
87:4 125:13
term　34:11 36:13,19,22　95:14 114:2　179:12 186:10
testified 5:24 6:15　37:5,10 39:7,13,21　126:15 127:15　80:10 145:9
timely
88:9　40:9 43:9 45:10　138:20 142:7　times
1:18 2:4,9
testify 10:2,9 12:2　45:24 47:19 49:13　153:9,13 161:21　3:25 6:18 7:15
12:14,21 40:15　51:3 52:12 55:4　174:6 175:12　14:24 60:14
41:2 186:5　56:10 60:8,17,20　thoughts
151:3　104:23 177:11
testifying 7:25　70:6 73:22 76:20　thousand 126:6　timing 78:24 79:5

11:5 28:16　79:18 81:10,22　132:21,22 140:17　134:25
testimony 10:6　85:19 87:8 90:5　146:19 152:7　timothy   2:19 5:15
22:19 185:6 186:6　91:18 94:5 95:13　154:12 159:16,16　title 21:15 86:12
186:10 188:12　103:9 106:20,24　159:18 166:2　101:8 114:25
th
70:24　106:25 109:16,18　177:2 183:24,25　today   7:25 8:13
thank 7:13 12:9　110:2,10,23 113:3　threatened 143:16　9:13 10:10 11:5
14:14 19:20 29:23　115:23 118:12　three 19:272:7　15:4 159:5
35:2 38:7,25 41:5　119:17 123:9　75:16 109:23　today's
13:21
41:13 45:24 56:25　124:21 125:17　112:16 161:25　185:6
90:19 94:24 96:14　126:11,13,15　163:10　told 63:6 102:10
99:25 102:21　128:3,5 137:24　137:17
tie　104:17 143:17
103:2,3 113:13　139:3 140:6,15　till
17:9 153:4　147:3 153:19
119:2,4 128:19　141:19,25 144:7　15:18 28:13
tim　181:2 182:14
133:4 144:12　146:6,18,25 151:2　41:13 49:19　184:21
159:6 161:8　152:4 153:8,14　time 1:11,174:16　tonight 85:13
thanks
41:16　154:18,24 155:5　11:14,18 15:9　top   14:13 18:2
144:18
theme　159:7,10 161:12　16:18,19 17:13　33:4 41:18 48:23
55:21
thereto　163:2 167:7　19:8 21:12,23　97:5,8 130:10
112:6　168:20 170:6,18　24:22 40:18 43:16　151:13 155:4

[topic - use]

topic
12:2　70:11 72:6,12,22　134:6 141:13,23　47:7 63:22 65:21

topics
11:22 12:15　73:13 162:8,12　155:14 159:25　76:21 90:13 92:9
12:22　176:18　161:19,19 179:18　92:13 107:18
total
94:22 95:12　truth
186:5　181:19 183:25　108:19 113:21
96:5 132:10 133:5　truthful
8:5 10:6　184:2　115:20 119:9
133:6,23,24 136:9　truthfully
10:2,9　type
17:15,20　121:3 141:15
totally
29:9,15　try
8:20 15:22　68:14 122:14　147:4 149:10,11
42:18　61:25 149:8 161:5　148:8,17　149:13,19 180:25
tower
3:25　171:5　types
22:5 51:22　182:17 183:2
track
124:17　trying
14:11 21:9　53:15 77:15,18　understood
9:3
trade
120:14　45:9 48:14 132:15　typically
43:20　88:6 89:17 100:16
trademarks
120:4　135:23,25 136:5　69:13 86:15 131:9　133:4 145:8
120:14　162:14 163:10　154:9 166:5　undisclosed
139:9
transaction
126:9　170:14 174:2　u　139:11,12
transactional　turbotax
60:23　u.s.
72:6,12 73:13　unheard
176:24
80:12　turn
3:9 11:8,21　161:10 162:12　unit
3:16
transactions
80:9　33:2 68:5 96:24　uh
8:25　united
1:2 3:19
82:9,25 84:13　105:18 137:23　ultimately
150:22　54:23 62:5 69:11
171:17　turning
20:24 23:5　un
42:7,8,9　69:19 71:20 72:2
transcript
8:14　29:24 34:3 35:23　unclear
47:2　72:22 157:7 162:8
186:9,9　37:18 41:5 43:6　uncover
40:22　universe
154:6
transfer
82:10　48:22 49:9 50:4　uncovered
40:23　unkept
42:9
152:22 171:18　55:12 61:7 73:15　underperforming　unknown
130:10
transfers
82:20　80:16 82:7 85:17　19:5　140:24 157:17
translated
57:8,14　86:5 88:19,19　understand
7:24　unpaid
156:13
57:16,19　91:4 92:18 95:11　8:3,15,21 9:2,4,7　unregistered
travel
123:2,21　103:7 106:11　9:15,20,22 11:25　120:6,17
143:3　109:3 113:13　12:13,18 25:19　unrelated
14:22
travels
115:24　115:12 120:3　27:11 34:11,13,16　unsecured
167:23
treated
77:21　124:25 126:5　34:17 40:16 58:7　updated
137:17
tried
59:13 134:25　130:8 132:6　81:17 86:21　upkeep
107:9
136:11　140:11 148:3　112:19 115:7　uploaded
109:17
trucks
97:14　149:14 151:13　129:14 147:18　109:20
true
157:2 172:15　159:7　148:11 150:5　ups
164:18
186:9 188:11　turns
144:24　153:5 158:11　use
53:11 64:24
trustee
54:23　twitter
120:20　166:14 169:2　113:18,22 115:15
69:11 71:20 72:2　two
14:24 15:11　170:17 175:10　116:6,10 117:3,7
157:7 163:17　15:12 50:16 62:20　177:20　117:22,24 119:7
176:21,22　77:15 82:23 87:18　understanding　122:19 139:17
trustees
20:16　90:7 92:8 129:5　11:4 27:18 28:11　158:24 162:4
62:6 68:24 69:19　132:18 133:10　32:23 37:15 38:8　169:5

[uses - witness]

60:17 115:21
uses　55:15 56:19,23　165:7,11 184:25　104:19,21 117:25

usually 69:15,16　57:2 58:15,21　185:4　134:15 141:17
81:12 83:25 86:25　59:15,25 61:14,18　videos 120:8,19　156:23 162:2
87:11,18 117:17　64:11 65:9,13　36:25 107:2
view　188:16
134:15 154:11　66:10 67:9,12,15　148:18 149:6　77:22
ways
utilities
144:12　67:24 71:12,18　166:10,19,23　we've 16:3 20:16
V　72:17 73:18 76:10　170:10　20:20 21:4,10,10
v&l 56:3　76:25 78:16 80:20　virtually 74:19　22:13 30:10,15
82:3 83:4 84:17　169:8 176:18,20　44:20 45:10 55:14
88:12
v&l's　84:22 85:25 87:19　118:16 142:5
visit　67:14 85:8 94:5
valuable
116:3　87:23 89:18 93:3　visits
118:9　128:12 129:20
valuation
121:10　94:6,10 95:3　volunteered
184:8　132:3 134:10
121:13　96:20 97:10,15　W　154:18,21 158:16
value
67:15　98:5 99:5 100:8　162:16 163:20
102:24 120:22　101:13 102:3　wait
8:19　164:3
121:7,19,22,25　106:2 107:23　walk
55:16 94:13　19:13
wealthy
122:3,5　109:5,11 111:20　walked
110:16　162:8
website
vans 97:14　112:8,16,17,20　98:4
walking　wednesday 16:17
various 18:2 20:3　122:15 124:9　141 · 7　45:17 116:2,16
42:2.5.6 51:16　125:22 128:10　1:5 2:9 3:18
wan　123:16,18 126:12
54:22 57:9 58:24　134:21 135:15,19　5:5 11:694:4　174:15 182:23
59:6 69:22 75:11　136:22 140:23　111:18　week 42:13
118:24 120:8,13　144:21 149:11　16:25 40:21
want　66:24
weekly
120:19 183:13　163:17　40:22 44:17 45:18　welcome 41:14
vehicle 115:23,24　verdolino's 130:14　55:16 66:23 75:21　went 17:5,8 31:5
117:13,22,23　59:16 138:3
verify　94:13 104:2　43:24 45:19
vehicles 115:14,21　veritext 4:3,5　105:18 107:5,12　122:23,24,25
116:9,13 117:2,8　vermont 176:17　146:3 147:19　123:5 174:7
118:25　79:16
version　149:8 168:18　17:4
western
verdolino   1:15 7:9　127:13 133:15　172:3　whatsoever
10:25 12:14,22　137:17,24 140:12　wanted 45:21　123:22
13:24 15:16 17:12　105:10 110:14　whereof 188:18
18:22,25 19:25　140:20,22 150:10
versus 38:9 41:24　144:7 163:22
20:10,15 21:15,20　119:24　wants 69:20 172:2　whispering 3:7
wife 138:25
22:24 23:6,18,25　172:3
24:17 25:7 26:3　video 1:14 3:13,17　washington 6:8　141:13 142:8,24
30:11,13 31:15　videographer 2:22　water 34:24　145:14
36:7,18 37:3,23　3:2 4:4 5:9,18　watercraft 97:15　willing 64:20
38:21 39:4,17　8:10 11:14,18　119:5　67:18,20
wip
43:7 44:13 48:8　34:23 35:4 90:20　watermark
162:6　wire
152:21
48:20 49:4,14,18　90:24 139:20　way 47:21 54:19　witness 5:11,20,22
49:25 50:15,20　140:3 164:25　62:10 67:3 75:14　26:21 27:8 28:15

[witness - zero]

29:10,11,16 35:3　91:3
wrapping　Z

46:21 59:12 78:11　96:8
wraps　67:14 79:20
zero
83:8 85:10 116:12　write 36:13 41:18　82:21 94:24
130:2 131:4,12　177:10　106:13,16,24
148:2 164:20　34:4 39:6
writes　107:19 108:20,23
167:9 176:11　writings 113:9　146:4,11
185:9 188:9,12,18　written 8:12 65:18
word
રતેઃડો　119:8 121:2
words
27:9　126:10
work
17:8 19:9,11　wrong 73:5 162:13
22:19 40:4 42:10　170:24
43:8 44:13 46:22　wrote 37:5 181:25
54:5,8,9 56:12,13　182:4
57:17 58:20 59:24　X
61:14,18 64:11
66:4,11 67:21　1:3,8 187:2,17
X
68:14 70:14 73:3　y
73:18 76:24 78:15　yacht
119:7
80:19 83:14,15,17　yeah
59:13 170:13
84:2 86:2 88:10　172:25
88:14,17 89:17　year 42:13 74:11
90:2,3,13 97:10,16　74:12 75:15,16
97:20 98:6 109:10　82:23 154:10,13
112:14,20 121:11　years 7:17 17:13
125:23 135:19　18:3 20:21 82:23
154:19,25 167:24　82:24 166:3,4
169:22 176:20　169:3 176:7
177:2 178:2,5　36:2 95:22
yep
worked    15:20 45:2　121:9 178:8,10
56:16 92:5 95:5　yesterday 106:22
100:17 109:22　123:16 126:12
135:22 136:4,9　york 1:18,19,21
working 51:18　2:5,5,10,10 3:25
90:6 96:22 136:15　4:2 5:23 58:8
155:25 178:4　79:15,17 115:8,10
works 134:15　146:22 173:19
176:9　176:14 188:3,7
world 38:2　youtube 120:20
worried 182:10
worth 19:10,25

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Rule 30

(e) Review By the Witness; Changes.

(1) Review; Statement of Changes. On request by the deponent or a party before the deposition is completed, the deponent must be allowed 30 days after being notified by the officer that the transcript or recording is available in which: (A) to review the transcript or recording; and (B) if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement listing the changes and the reasons for making them.

(2) Changes Indicated in the Officer's Certificate. The officer must note in the certificate prescribed by Rule 30(f)(1) whether a review was requested and, if so, must attach any changes the deponent makes during the 30-day period.

DISCLAIMER: THE FOREGOING FEDERAL PROCEDURE RULES ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THE ABOVE RULES ARE CURRENT AS OF APRIL 1, 2019. PLEASE REFER TO THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION.
VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS COMPANY CERTIFICATE AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Veritext Legal Solutions represents that the foregoing transcript is a true, correct and complete transcript of the colloquies, questions and answers as submitted by the court reporter. Veritext Legal Solutions further represents that the attached exhibits, if any, are true, correct and complete documents as submitted by the court reporter and/or attorneys in relation to this deposition and that the documents were processed in accordance with our litigation support and production standards.

Veritext Legal Solutions is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of client and witness information, in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), as amended with respect to protected health information and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as amended, with respect to Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Physical transcripts and exhibits are managed under strict facility and personnel access controls. Electronic files of documents are stored in encrypted form and are transmitted in an encrypted fashion to authenticated parties who are permitted to access the material. Our data is hosted in a Tier 4 SSAE 16 certified facility.

Veritext Legal Solutions complies with all federal and State regulations with respect to the provision of court reporting services, and maintains its neutrality and independence regardless of relationship or the financial outcome of any litigation. Veritext requires adherence to the foregoing professional and ethical standards from all of its subcontractors in their independent contractor agreements.

Inquiries about Veritext Legal Solutions' confidentiality and security policies and practices should be directed to Veritext's Client Services Associates indicated on the cover of this document or at www.veritext.com.