---
type: court_doc
id: "court_sdny_65_0"
court: "SDNY"
case_no: "23-cr-00118"
doc_number: 65
doc_type: "ORDER"
filed_date: "2023-05-05"
lang: "en"
machine_translated: false
url: "https://mubeitech.com/en/court/court_sdny_65_0"
json_url: "https://mubeitech.com/api/court/court_sdny_65_0"
---
# Guo Wengui / Miles Guo — criminal case · ORDER · ECF #65

**Objection Letter — United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (a/k/a Miles Guo, Guo Wengui), SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #65 (May 5, 2023). Defense counsel for defendant Yanping Wang objected to the detention order entered by Magistrate Judge Lehrburger and requested permission to file a motion to revoke the order following receipt of information from the Pretrial Services Office.**


May 5, 2023
Via ECF

Hon. Analisa Torres United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Yanping Wang, S1 1:23-cr-00118-AT

Dear Hon. Judge Torres:

Along with ChaudhryLaw PLLC, we represent Ms. Wang in the above-referenced matter. We write to inform the Court that we object to the detention order entered by Magistrate Judge Lehrburger on April 21, 2023, and intend to file a motion to revoke the detention order under 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b).

On April 21, 2023, Magistrate Judge Lehrburger ordered Ms. Wang detained pending trial because he found that no conditions could reasonably assure Ms. Wang's attendance at future proceedings. (ECF No. 56 at 23–24). His decision recited certain factual assertions the government made regarding Ms. Wang's interview with Pretrial Services upon her arrest. (Id. at 21).

Because we require additional information about Ms. Wang's interview with Pretrial Services to finalize our motion to revoke the detention order, on April 27, 2023, we filed a letter requesting the Court order the Pretrial Services Office for the Southern District of New York to provide us with certain information. (ECF No. 59). On May 4, 2023, the Court ordered the government to respond to our letter by May 11, 2023, stating whether it objects to our request for information. (ECF No. 64).

\\\*

We cannot adequately respond to the detention order until we receive and review this information. Therefore, we herein object to Magistrate Lehrburger's detention order, and respectfully request the Court permit us to file a motion to revoke the detention order under 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b) fourteen days after we receive the requested information from Pretrial Services.

Respectfully submitted,

Lipman Law PLLC

[Signature]

Alex Lipman

SO ORDERED:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ HON. ANALISA TORRES, U.S.D.J.

Cc: AUSA Juliana N. Murray (via ECF) AUSA Micah Fergenson (via ECF) AUSA Ryan Finkel (via ECF)