Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 004

rui*** contends that tens of millions in legal fees and ten thousand Alliance comrades have accomplished little.

rui*** asserts that this massive legal expenditure achieves less than an ordinary frontline laborer.

rui*** emphasizes that this unflattering comparison includes themselves.

rui*** prompts other participants to review a shared legal document.

chu*** recounts receiving Joint Status Letter 705 two days earlier without reading it closely, preferring to focus on refuting a commentator.

chu*** shares reference text defining what a joint status letter is and how it functions in United States court proceedings.

rui*** argues that supporters must personally intervene in court to expose procedural injustice.

rui*** contends that the defense attorneys will never expose these procedural issues themselves.

rui*** tells chu*** that finding even ten participants willing to file motions would be fortunate.

chu*** contends that Congress cannot intervene in criminal cases, arguing that lawmakers cannot even intervene in cases involving prominent political leaders.

mss*** asks for a video clip where the defendant claimed a full investigation requires Congressional intervention.

sar*** comments that a public commentator might respond directly or act behind the scenes.

him*** asks rui*** when attorneys allegedly stated that submitting personal statements was too late.

nig*** contends that information should be sought directly from the defendant rather than trusted from online sources.

him*** asks whether defense counsel filed letters with the court requesting the withdrawal of representation.

chu*** invites other participants and their associates to join while expressing support for opposing the movement.

mss*** describes feeling misled into filling out real customer information on the exchange and inadvertently becoming registered as a victim.

him*** argues that anyone misled into filing exchange forms should clarify their stance to the court directly.

chu*** urges members to examine the second superseding indictment and nearby filings where the defendant raised objections.

mss*** shares an external social media link related to the ongoing case discussions.

sar*** disputes an online commentator's broadcast claiming that new prosecutors and defense counsel turned the case around, arguing it merely misleads listeners.

rui*** tells another member to consult the Alliance if they only want pleasant narratives.

tal*** accuses a member of harassment, recounting allegations raised by several female participants.

chu*** confronts the Alliance with personal insults, denies their claims to free speech, and promotes an independent chat server for unrestricted case discussions.