Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 005

ntp*** asks why the court dismissed the third-party intervention and inquires what went wrong.

chu*** recounts that the court cited court harassment, personal affairs, and threats to others, but contends the filing was not fully dismissed.

chu*** describes Document 528 and Document 596 as orders concerning them, conceding a lack of legal knowledge and explaining that certain filings were drafted for an outside audience.

ntp*** asks whether third-party motions now require prior screening before submission rather than being categorically rejected.

him*** contends that prior screening applies only to Luosi Ge due to excessive filings and not to other participants.

chu*** argues that claiming the weaponization of justice requires presenting solid evidence from court filings rather than chanting slogans.

ntp*** argues that ordinary fellow fighters lack influence, making it difficult for their voices to be heard.

him*** highlights an external case analysis post, asserting that it provides insightful legal breakdown rather than mere insults.

chu*** contends that Congress has no constitutional power to adjudicate ongoing criminal cases, citing former President Trump and the January 6 cases.

him*** contends that anyone who completed registration forms harmed the Whistleblower Movement.

zha*** argues that uninformed fellow fighters entering the group can help thoroughly expose opportunists claiming loyalty to Guo.

zha*** asks whether the referenced contract exists and requests to see a sample.

sar*** recounts being barred from the Hcoin group after criticizing Changdao, and describes facing hostile livestream denunciations and blocking from Xiaoyang's circle after questioning a petition.

chu*** describes being blocked immediately during Xiaoyang's live broadcast upon stating their name, characterizing the circle as an exclusive faction.

sky*** disputes whether the individual has any dismantling capability, contending that real influence requires holding a formal position within the Alliance.

sky*** wonders which upcoming leadership cohort will plant hidden traps or trigger the next controversy.

nig*** asks whether any new developments or updates have emerged over recent days.

him*** describes the ongoing exchange as idle chatter with no substantial new developments.

rui*** tells chu*** that state security personnel have not targeted them out of fear.

rui*** contends that if authorities approached chu***, Judge Torres would react explosively.

rui*** disputes the scenario, asserting that such an outcome is impossible.

chu*** describes losing money to the Himalaya Exchange and resolving to evaluate evidence independently rather than trusting influencers.

chu*** argues that Document 26-7 preliminary injunctions and creditor registrations bound Guo to G-series assets, contending criminal court findings on fraudulent claims could challenge trustee Luc Despins.

rui*** contends that fellow fighters protesting at Luc Despins's home gave prosecutors justification to assert obstruction of justice charges against Guo.

him*** asks how a judge should rule if the prosecution asserts fraud against supporters who do not consider themselves victims.

nig*** points to precedent such as outgoing presidential pardons under President Biden to contend that legal outcomes are not absolute.

rui*** contends that Guo could ultimately obtain relief through a political resolution.

chu*** recounts receiving an interview invitation from commentator Huang Hebian, stating they agreed only to provide unedited voice responses due to work demands.

chu*** contends that rival influencer circles and Alliance groups completely monopolize public discussion channels.

him*** recalls Guo's remarks about a future general pardon for CCP members, questioning whether that would encompass NFSC organizations.