Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 007

sar*** argues that members of Xiaoyang's group demonstrate poor character and describes an associated account fleeing after being identified.

rui*** contends that accounts such as Dali Mao and Feng Yuzhe are devoted followers of Xiaoyang's group.

him*** recalls that another member was previously blocked by Xiaoyang.

rui*** contends that anyone blocked by Xiaoyang is out of the ordinary.

rui*** argues that appeals to uphold an official group image represent a deceptive narrative.

rui*** contends that such rhetoric is intended to silence participants and suppress questioning.

nig*** contends that the outcome remains unsettled and urges participants to act with a clear conscience rather than say one thing while doing another.

ntp*** concurs that regardless of how others evaluate the matter, they only seek to maintain a clear conscience.

him*** asserts that they never engage in conjecture without supporting evidence.

nig*** questions what evidence him*** actually possesses.

chu*** advises compiling evidence of fraud and Gettr accounts to deliver directly to Guo's defense lawyers, despite noting advice that victims should avoid contacting defense counsel.

rui*** expresses agreement with the proposed course of action.

ntp*** argues that individuals who are not directly involved must provide concrete evidence to be convincing.

ntp*** doubts that either online letters or physical mail would ever reach Guo directly.

ntp*** contends that allegations of illicit conduct should target current management rather than the entire Himalaya Alliance entity.

rui*** agrees that focusing allegations on current management is acceptable.

ntp*** argues against issuing directives to defense counsel, advocating instead for submitting recommendations and evidence to avoid previous procedural missteps.

rui*** disputes that approaching the attorneys requires such caution.

him*** recounts hearing that creditor registration originated as a joke by Guo that the alliance subsequently executed to solicit members as creditors.

him*** shares an external social media post discussing the controversy.

him*** contends that as a third party, an individual lacks standing to raise matters concerning Wang Yanping because it is unrelated to them.

him*** argues that a third party can only raise issues directly concerning their own property security.

rui*** contends that the primary purpose of writing to defense attorneys now is to establish proof if counsel fails to take action later.

rui*** argues that their preserved correspondence will serve as evidence of neglect by the defense attorneys.