Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 019

ntp*** questions whether a prolonged period of silence from the defense represents a positive or negative development.

him*** shares defense counsel's letter dated Jul 25, 2025, in Case 23 Cr. 118 (AT) requesting Judge Analisa Torres to adjourn sentencing until at least December 2025 due to voluminous trial records.

ntp*** concludes that requesting an adjournment is the only practical option remaining.

ntp*** points out that an unindicted co-conspirator list is included in Doc 382-1.

ntp*** questions who has legal standing to inquire into the matter, arguing that a third party cannot do so.

rui*** rejects allegations of internal factionalism, arguing that members act independently for themselves rather than adhering to collectivist ideologies.

ntp*** asks whether document 714 remains entirely inaccessible to the public.

him*** observes that news media could petition to unseal document 714, though none have done so.

rui*** remarks approvingly on the reporting and legal efforts of Inner City Press.

him*** argues that the prosecution withdrew obstruction charges because recognizing investor claims would contradict alleging that encouraging creditor registration was unlawful.

him*** asserts his perspective that prosecutors are bound to crack down firmly on offenders.

him*** contends that individuals submitting unfounded claims should not be permitted to register as creditors.

him*** mentions that another participant also invested in G-Club.

him*** recounts that the member appeared to have invested in additional G-series vehicles, including G-Dollar and the Himalaya Exchange.

reb*** contends that the bankruptcy court treated investor funds as converted into personal assets, arguing the prosecution relied on manufactured complaints and grand jury hearsay to obtain the arrest warrant.

rui*** describes having completed about half of their written motion.

him*** questions why fellow participants were not targeted.

rui*** clarifies that the draft motion is directed to both the presiding judge and the prosecution.

him*** challenges an interlocutor's pessimistic assessment of the case and suggests they depart if they consider defeat inevitable.

zci*** clarifies that their intention is not sabotage, but rather observing how remaining supporters attempt survival after the leader's downfall.

ntp*** dismisses opposing voices as irrelevant actors who have been left behind by history.

zci*** criticizes the chat culture as intolerantly autocratic and unacceptable to free discussion.

rui*** posts an external link related to internal discussions.

zci*** disputes allegations of bad faith, maintaining that they are openly presenting differing perspectives to fellow members.