Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 025

rui*** contends that the case against Guo is fundamentally absurd.

rui*** argues that procedural injustice occurred because no one actively challenged it.

rui*** contends that witness Qingteng engaged in obvious obstruction of justice.

rui*** affirms that the proposed legal logic is sound.

rui*** suggests forwarding a copy of the argument to Guo's defense lawyers in a couple of days.

rui*** advises asking the lawyers whether prosecutors have contacted them.

him*** contends that prosecutors would take notice if even ten people submitted Brady materials rather than the 2,300 suggested by Luosi.

pz0*** notes that the appellate filing fee is $605.

rui*** claims to understand what Guo intended to accomplish.

rui*** questions why Guo would choose to enter prison.

xin*** prompts rui*** to explain further.

him*** argues that Guo relied on legal battles rather than politicians and contends the case will ultimately be resolved through the judicial system.

gon*** contends that while Guo trusted juries, defense counsel performed poorly and improper judicial conduct also influenced the prosecution.

rui*** introduces an assessment of the baseline legal situation.

rui*** asserts that prosecutors unquestionably violated the Fifth Amendment.

ntp*** questions whether alleged ongoing fraud by alliance farms would benefit the defense or harm it as co-conspirators.

hon*** argues that such evidence helps by shifting status from co-conspirator to principal perpetrator.

ntp*** asks how being characterized as a principal perpetrator could be advantageous.

xin*** questions whether to trust appeals by organizers since the movement will need personnel after Guo's release.

him*** contends that trust is a personal choice while illegal acts are handled by law.

him*** advises suing whoever is personally responsible for the misconduct.

pz0*** shares a recent motion filed by trustee Luc.

rui*** requests an explanation of the trustee's filing.

chu*** argues that bankruptcy court decisions legally binding Guo to the G-series were the primary driver of his criminal conviction.

rui*** contends that this legal linkage was also the key pretext used to justify his arrest.

zha*** argues that prosecutors' standards unreasonably demand constant guarantees and disputes that widespread compensation was requested.

zha*** contends that the promise to cover losses was a genuine commitment rather than empty boasting.

wen*** asks whether anyone has considered communicating directly with Guo about advancing the legal case.

rui*** inquires how such communication could actually be carried out.