Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 033

ntp*** questions whether the stated allegations are actually true.

rod*** contends that the defense arguments would be clear if funds had not been transferred to accounts belonging to Guo Mei, Guo Qiang, and Yue.

him*** argues that Guo was not the individual who transferred funds to those people.

him*** contends that if authorities could arrest Guo today, they could arrest someone like vash tomorrow.

him*** argues that the entire group could accuse vash of directing all G-series investments.

reb*** argues that once prosecutorial misconduct is proven, tainted evidence and its derivatives will be excluded, leaving the judge to evaluate the remaining evidence under case precedent.

chu*** asks someone to check the contents of Document 725.

chu*** contends that certain individuals are consistently avoiding Document 723.

ntp*** argues that since the filing was submitted, ath*** should firmly press the issue against them.

ath*** recounts facing a lack of time and asks whether filing pro se simply involves copying previous documents to send to the court.

ath*** recounts struggling to review numerous filings without legal expertise to identify procedural flaws.

ath*** details draft pro se arguments alleging lack of notice and overbroad asset freezes under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a), 21 U.S.C. § 853(c), ECF Nos. 382, 388, and 395, bankruptcy procedural errors under 11 U.S.C. § 341 and § 362(b)(4), and Alliance Farms' unindicted status.

pz0*** argues that invoking the Crime Victims' Rights Act during sentencing while claiming the defendant is innocent is contradictory, citing questions the judge posed to Ava Chin and Forrest Zhou at Wang Yanping's sentencing hearing.

rui*** contends that they did not state the defendant was innocent and notes their upcoming motion will clarify their position.

rim*** contends that Gail explicitly stated this point in the second version of the motion, which Gong Dalang then publicized.

ntp*** questions the purpose of the lawyers' new motion, asking why the strategy shifted away from Operation Fox Hunt materials.

goh*** contends that only one week remains until next week's deadline.

him*** argues that participants should adopt the role of third parties prioritizing asset protection rather than entangling themselves in attempts to overturn the conviction.

rim*** recounts that participants in farm loans, G-Club, and HEX were allocated Himalaya Coins at $0.10 and argues no fraud occurred because withdrawals functioned before the DOJ freeze and refunds were honored.

goh*** contends that authorities used the exchange freeze to collect form submissions, mislead the jury into convicting Guo, shut down the exchange, and repurpose claimants as victims.

goh*** asks about the relationship between William Je and Guo, inquiring whether prosecutors addressed their ties in Case 118 and whether liability can be separated.

him*** argues that anyone claiming to be a victim must expose ongoing criminal conduct by Alliance Farms to be considered legitimate.

him*** contends that genuine victims should not tolerate ongoing fraudulent activity by Alliance Farms.

ath*** recounts seeing an allegation that farms were co-conspirators and asks whether court documents identify only two or three specific farms or all of them.

reb*** argues that critics attacking pro se filers mistakenly portray efforts to shield assets from false claims and procedural misconduct as attempts to overturn the verdict.

sar*** contends that critics attack the filings while supporters either stay silent or discuss only Document 724 while ignoring pro se Documents 723 and 729.

chu*** describes circulating a detailed report written by Ryan, disclaiming personal legal liability and advising participants to cite it only after fully understanding it.

ntp*** contends that once the report is submitted, defense counsel must act and demonstrate their true commitments.

ntp*** contends that there is a risk the judge will delay taking action on the matter.

ntp*** welcomes Teacher Huang and asks for their perspective on recent court developments.