Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 037

rui*** questions why the individual is waiting and refuses to act if the second alternative applies.

hah*** sends a message containing no text.

rim*** contends that Ruien and user xin*** are staging pro se victim claims, pressuring others into acting as victims, and harassing the judge with letters.

rim*** accuses the recipient of having orchestrated and directed court filings ECF 739 and ECF 742.

rod*** asks which platform displays the newest document 747, noting that their current site only reaches document 741.

rod*** states that CourtListener only displays document 741.

zha*** observes that filing 744 was accused by filings 739 and 742 of belonging to Ruien Xiaoge, warning the group that they are under close monitoring.

zha*** circulates Ryan Bai's emergency response in Case No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT submitted on Sep 10, 2025, which refutes online identity claims in ECF 739 and ECF 742, asserts $23,000 in documented losses, and requests a stay of forfeiture proceedings.

chu*** shares an external social media link regarding developments in the case.

chu*** shares another external social media update regarding the case.

rui*** argues that if the court continues to permit their submissions, it demonstrates that the judicial process is fundamentally broken.

rui*** contends that if the court rejects their submissions, it proves even further that the judicial process has broken down.

rui*** argues that both defense teams neglected their duties by failing to challenge the prosecution's alleged fraud on the court.

rui*** asserts that they personally exposed the prosecution's alleged fraud on the court as a victim.

him*** notes that another participant is attempting to connect a meeting involving Zhang and Guo to the third-party pro se filings.

rui*** dismisses the attempt to link the meeting with the pro se filings as completely fanciful.

hon*** shares an external post concerning the bankruptcy proceedings and trustee fee disputes.

hon*** contends that transferring bankruptcy assets would prevent continuous fund depletion and halt enormous trustee fees that consume investor restitution and forfeiture funds.

him*** asks whether interested parties can still be added to the case at the current stage.

rui*** contends that anyone can join as an interested party at any time.

rui*** contends that the individual brought the outcome upon herself through her own conduct.

rui*** asks why she would fear having others speak about her actions.

rui*** points out that more than 48 hours will have passed by tomorrow.

rui*** advises user chu*** to follow up using the most severe language possible.