Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 052

Participant hah*** submits a message containing no text.

Participant zci*** contends that the other speaker's logic is confused and questions what point they are trying to make.

Participant zci*** asks whether procedural validity should be judged by the district court's recognition or the Second Circuit's own determination.

Participant rui*** argues that others celebrated prematurely, contending that Luosige faced a procedural rejection rather than a dismissal and can proceed once amended.

Participant him*** contends that certain members understand the situation fully but feign ignorance.

Participant him*** asserts that those individuals are fundamentally acting in bad faith.

Participant zci*** contends that anyone opposing Ryan is either foolish or malicious.

Participant hah*** submits a message containing no text.

Participant ntp*** criticizes excessive praise of Ryan as overly blatant and unhelpful.

Participant ntp*** describes the 600-dollar filing fee as excessively expensive and recounts applying for in forma pauperis status.

Participant ntp*** asks group members for financial assistance so the prepared motions do not go to waste.

Participant hon*** contends that fee waivers are only temporary and that the court will later demand repayment or installment payments once any refund is received.

Participant him*** describes reviewing Luosige's appellate filing and contends that it is clearly drafted.

Participant him*** notes that the filing explicitly referenced other third-party motions that had also been suppressed.

Participant rui*** contends that the court has adopted tactics of evasion and deflection reminiscent of Chinese Communist Party politics.

Participant rui*** expresses vulgar frustration dismissive of continuing the legal battle.

Participant rui*** contends that the opposing parties and court officials only understand physical force.

Participant rui*** argues that every single one of the 679 individuals listed is a victim.

Participant wei*** contends that Gail is merely inventing excuses for why the court failed to docket the third-party motion.

Participant wei*** argues that the court did not reject the filing, attributing the issue to incorrect document encoding by submitters.

Participant rui*** dismisses the claim as nonsense.

Participant wei*** observes that Gail signed Document 763, whereas Document 755 listed Gail in the title but lacked Gail's signature on the document.

Participant rui*** disputes this, arguing that Document 755 was filed by the government.

Participant wei*** directs others to inspect the specific section of the document.

Participant reb*** inquires about the nature and contents of Document 765.

Participant him*** explains that Document 765 is Ryan Bai's appeal filing to the Second Circuit.

Participant chu*** shares an external link regarding the filing.

Participant him*** contends that the release of Document 765 will throw the group into chaotic frenzy.

Participant pz0*** argues that because Ryan did not serve the petition on all trial parties, the Second Circuit transferred it to the Southern District of New York for PACER docketing to effect service on all electronic filers.

Participant pz0*** advises group members not to overthink the procedural transfer.