Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 056

reb*** contends that procedural bail denial is often treated as harmless error on appeal, meaning convictions typically stand if jury evidence remains untainted even if a decision is overturned.

reb*** argues that even if appellate judges acknowledge judicial fraud, they would likely order a retrial rather than granting an outright acquittal.

rui*** contends that targeting obstruction of justice and fraudulent claims strikes directly at the core of the matter.

rui*** notes that defense counsel is actively pursuing an argument under Rule 29.

rui*** highlights pursuing a Rule 33 motion alongside prosecutorial misconduct dismissed with prejudice.

rui*** contends that the legal proceedings will ultimately conclude through this procedural path.

zci*** asks rui*** to disclose specifically when Guo will be released.

rui*** responds that controlling the timing of such an outcome is beyond their personal power.

rui*** explains that they lack confidence regarding the possibility of a short-term release.

sar*** recounts identifying as a victim of the Guo case rather than Guo personally, stating Guo took no money from them and possessed no personal bank accounts.

zci*** asks whether others recognize their disclosures and whether their transparency helps make amends for past actions.

rui*** asserts complete certainty regarding the issue under consideration.

sar*** describes consulting an automated tool regarding substantial rights under the CVRA, citing statutory participant protections under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(1)-(8).

sar*** recounts past efforts by others to discourage people from claiming victim status under Guo, contending those opposing efforts are now powerless.

reb*** asks whether statutory communication rights with prosecutors permit filers to seek a writ of mandamus if the prosecution fails to address alleged fraud on the court.

rui*** contends that the situation will shift fundamentally once the Second Circuit intervenes.

chu*** describes the procedure where pro se filers deliver materials to the clerk's office for the docket clerk to upload.

beg*** recounts contacting the court clerk on Nov 4, 2025 regarding undocketed filings and proposes petitioning the Second Circuit to compel Judge Torres to enter the submission.

beg*** contends that future developments depend on prosecutorial personnel decisions in the Southern District of New York under the incoming administration's Department of Justice.

rui*** shares a link to an external social media post relevant to the ongoing group discussion.

spr*** asks what specific legal grounds must be established when requesting judicial recusal.

chu*** asks whether any individual nominated by the President can be appointed as a federal judge.

him*** describes the constitutional structure under Article II, Section 2, explaining how presidential nomination and Senate confirmation balance judicial independence with democratic accountability.

zci*** argues that attempting to verify whether participants are covert operatives is pointless, advocating evaluating members solely by their concrete actions and utility.

sar*** questions another participant's identity and inquires whether they originate from or were expelled by the Alliance.

sar*** contends that an external commentator collaborated with key Alliance figures to plant fabricated news aimed at destroying the NFSC.

rui*** argues that individuals pursuing major endeavors must prepare for all contingencies rather than obsessing over odds of failure.

zha*** describes having committed all their personal stakes to the effort.

rui*** argues that if proceedings under §853 are blocked, participants can petition the Second Circuit for a writ of mandamus.

him*** advises participants to request redactions to safeguard personal privacy when filing.

beg*** recounts submitting a personal statement on Sep 29, 2025 that has not appeared on the docket, questioning whether to appeal to the Second Circuit.

zha*** recalls that individuals sending self-written submissions also copied their filings to defense counsel.

zha*** asks whether a presidential pardon will be granted.

ntp*** questions whether receiving a pardon would strip away standing to appeal and pursue accountability against judicial authorities.

rui*** contends that everyone should simply concentrate on carrying out their assigned duties.