Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 092

him*** clarifies that the remark addresses ordinary victims rather than extreme individuals claiming victim status.

kir*** sarcastically remarks on the supposed nobility and greatness of victims.

him*** notes that the defense sentencing submission was prepared to refute the prosecution.

beg*** contends that withholding materials at the Second Circuit is a deliberate tactical choice rather than showing all defense cards at once.

kir*** argues that omitting these materials reflects a lack of professional standards and disrespect toward the appellate court.

kir*** questions why defense counsel failed to mention any court order.

him*** asks whether Chinese convictions for endangering national security would be considered justified if the G-series projects were merely fraudulent schemes.

him*** questions the premise that participating in overseas fraud schemes equates to endangering national security.

him*** contends that the resulting contradictions make it impossible for the United States government to clear its stance.

him*** points out that the prosecution's sentencing memorandum is not accessible on PACER.

him*** asserts that the prosecution shared the sentencing submission only with defense counsel.

him*** notes that according to Document 822, the defense stated that the presentence report recommended 300 months.

ntp*** compares the Second Circuit's judicial position to an intermediary caught under uncomfortable opposing pressures.

kir*** contends that the prosecution will inevitably present evidence detailing ties between hostile witnesses and prosecution witnesses.

ntp*** argues that defense counsel is merely going through the motions to avoid criticism without seriously attempting a rescue.

reb*** questions whether the defense is barred from contacting individuals who filed Crime Victims' Rights Act motions and ponders whether attendance at hearings must be self-initiated.

him*** asks whether the 1,000 individuals contacting defense counsel denied being victims because none of them submitted Gale forms.

ntp*** contends that Document 822 speaks the truth and shatters fabricated narratives surrounding detention at MDC.

kir*** instructs another participant to submit the referenced information to evidence.

him*** asks whether calculations incorporate the financial losses claimed by Gale and others.

him*** argues that the prison sentence will still amount to 25 years regardless.

joh*** contends that the individual's awkward standing makes physical disappearance the most favorable outcome for all sides.

joh*** cynically argues that deceased persons prove more useful than living witnesses.

him*** estimates that without various pressures, the sentence would likely have reached around 50 years.

him*** contends that after continuous maneuvering, the anticipated sentence has settled at 25 years.

kir*** argues that preceding events were merely setting the stage.

ntp*** shares an external social media link containing case commentary.

beg*** posts an external social media link regarding related developments.

kir*** contends that the prosecution itself does not pose the primary issue.