Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 095

joh*** contends that refunds should be demanded in HDO stablecoins comparable to USDT or USDC.

joh*** argues against returning funds directly in US dollars.

joh*** points out that HDO is not deployed on a public blockchain or recognized by external exchanges, making it impossible to convert into fiat currency.

joh*** emphasizes that HDO cannot be converted into fiat currency because no exchange recognizes it and it lacks a public blockchain.

joh*** disputes the claimed 1:1 reserve ratio for HDO against the dollar, arguing the true ratio might be 5:1.

reb*** contends that manipulated HDO was created early on to artificially inflate candlestick charts and execute illicit cash-outs.

beg*** argues that such actors are criminals deserving criminal penalties and asserts that the Department of Justice prosecuted the wrong target.

reb*** remarks that while the defendant's ability to select good allies is questionable, the defendant's propensity for picking bad actors seems unmatched.

ntp*** recalls depositing funds because Guo had promised that the Himalaya Exchange would operate like an interest-paying bank, only for outsiders to cash out.

reb*** disputes ownership assertions, contending that the actual controlling figure is Yu Jianmin.

ntp*** asks whether Yu Jianmin served as Guo's family fund manager based on previous recollections.

joh*** notes that the Wang motion highlighted standardized submission templates, pointing to two duplicated filings with identical claim amounts.

ntp*** argues that the dynamic was not identification but attraction, asserting that only disreputable actors could bring Guo down.

him*** contends that the affidavit under discussion is the one referenced in Gair's motion.

spr*** questions why anyone would feel compelled to file false police reports in a purely financial case.

him*** contends that fraudulent reports can arise even within financial cases.

spr*** argues that the false reports were coerced by sovereign state authority rather than private adversaries, lamenting that defense attorneys failed to establish this political context at trial.

ntp*** describes running the petition through GPT and Gemini, observing that both language models reached comparable assessments.

ntp*** contends that because AI analysis considers success under 853n unlikely, the affidavits are aimed solely at obtaining remission relief.

him*** argues that the strategy is to apply under 853n first and then pivot to 853i if 853n is rejected.

him*** argues that establishing victim status is secondary to an effort to whitewash the charge of conspiracy to defraud.

kir*** asks how such an effort to clear the fraud charge would actually operate.

him*** contends that requiring individuals to execute affidavits is intended to demonstrate that their actions were entirely voluntary.

kir*** recounts Judge Torres stating that an individual participant's personal experiences cannot be generalized across the case.

kir*** remarks that such a judicial limitation is reasonable.

kir*** questions how much evidence of false crime reporting Yongbing Zhang actually possesses and whether Zhang ever formally submitted it.

ntp*** questions who is orchestrating the sudden proliferation of foreign-language social media posts.

xin*** asks members whether they would invest in any newly launched projects following a release.

xin*** argues that earlier slogans declaring that everything was just beginning actually signaled the start of debt collection.

kir*** cites Second Circuit document 40 to advocate filing misconduct reports against three current attorneys.

roy*** contends that disciplinary committees only sanction attorney misconduct and cannot docket filings, win cases, or overturn court judgments.

kir*** argues that every lawyer representing Guo should be reported for professional misconduct.

joh*** recounts the dangerous repercussions suffered by targeted figures and urges domestic supporters to remain inactive as security organs seek victims.

joh*** recounts Ava's broadcast warning that mainland victims recover no money while exposing relatives to threats, contrasting this with defiant members unconcerned with personal wealth or safety.

ntp*** remarks that Ava nevertheless succeeded in following through.