Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 097

A participant claimed the blocked names actually visited the defendant and that sales involving him continued afterward. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** claimed those names were registered under the defendant. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** added that those people had the right to visit him. Community statements, not court findings.

reb*** argued it was incorrect to keep adding Zhou Yue in context since the third charging version allegedly already listed all farm companies as part of the conspiracy. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** replied that the reference point predated Rico. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** said the cited file was from much earlier. Community statements, not court findings.

joh*** asked whether the money would then be treated as harming national security. Community statements, not court findings.

joh*** questioned how the conduct could be framed as fraud. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** replied that the fraud-related theory could be established. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** argued that any witness based in China is unreliable because manipulation by government is possible. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** extended that view, saying anyone with family in China could be subject to possible manipulation. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said this case had not examined even that one statement. Community statements, not court findings.

joh*** said Mulan’s testimony was treated as key evidence and claimed testimony existed that property was bought by Guo. Community statements, not court findings.

reb*** referenced prosecution materials showing some funds were for defendant personal use, with a lamp-labeled account tied to HCHK and farm loans, and part of those loans allegedly used for defendant family and linked to a farm loan committee. Community statements, not court findings.

reb*** argued there was still no proof in court of a fake creditor claim, only indirect inconsistencies in bankruptcy proceedings. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** said the claim of no victims had been promoted from the start by the alliance. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** added that the new defense counsel now mainly seeks a no-victim conclusion and has not focused on disproving Guo’s link to the G-series. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** claimed U.S. fraud money had already been classified as a national-security crime in China. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** stated that sentencing, forfeiture, and all procedures should be suspended. Community statements, not court findings.

reb*** stated that once a jury convicts, the government needs court approval to drop the case. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** claimed the special prosecutor was appointed to help Ryan sort out the case. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said Ryan himself requested creation of the special prosecutor position. Community statements, not court findings.

hel*** said the court is a subordinate body of the Department of Justice and the department head is the chief prosecutor. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** relayed that the alliance said the FBI set the fire. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** commented that CCP-linked arson would be abnormal. Community statements, not court findings.

spr*** argued that FBI disabled surveillance and, whether they claim responsibility or not, the control of cameras suggested their involvement. Community statements, not court findings.

chu*** said him*** was invited into a room intended for spam posting. Community statements, not court findings.

chu*** added that if he left the room he would be blacklisted and denied re-entry. Community statements, not court findings.

Sap*** noted that user wei*** left without being muted or having posts removed in the court-doc thread. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said this was effectively the defendant’s last hope. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** stated that an appeal must be filed within fourteen days after sentencing. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said issues can be carried into second-circuit proceedings as grounds for appeal. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said he had run many scenario analyses. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** claimed acquittal was only possible through a miracle. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** predicted sentencing would effectively collapse, potentially even resulting in a zero-day sentence. Community statements, not court findings.