Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 099

him*** contends that someone poses as a victim because the prosecution turns a blind eye, while questioning whether the judge knows.

joh*** disputes the claim of succession, contending that no authorization was granted and the individual is not a registered corporate legal representative.

joh*** contends that the prosecution treats individuals as victims to secure Guo's conviction, only to reclassify the funds under remission when distributions occur.

ntp*** asks whether the court handling the matter is the bankruptcy court or the Southern District.

him*** contends that Luc clearly possesses legal standing.

ntp*** states that news reports explicitly identified the trustee responsible for the bankruptcy.

him*** argues that the Second Circuit does not handle those matters.

him*** contends that the Second Circuit dismissed Guo Mei because judges identified no procedural defects.

reb*** argues that Luc must appear once third parties step forward, describing how expenditures escalated from under 30 million during the 2024 trial to over 60 million by the 2025 forfeiture against Guo.

beg*** recounts filing a motion in ECF 364 raising judicial bias and procedural injustice before Judge Torres regarding Rule 853(n) filings, noting the court has not responded.

reb*** suggests submitting a notice to the Second Circuit to report that the Southern District has not uploaded the mandamus filing notice despite prompting.

reb*** states that ECF 364 and ECF 441 have not yet been uploaded.

beg*** recounts unexpectedly receiving another Second Circuit consolidation notice postmarked Feb 27 after previously receiving the same document.

reb*** asks whether the earlier notice came from the Second Circuit while the latest one was sent from the Southern District.

beg*** recalls that the earlier notice received was also a physical paper document.

beg*** contends that the prosecution invented the term G Enterprise without evidence to bundle distinct G-series entities into a single unit.

beg*** argues that this framing was designed to assert that Guo controlled everything.

joh*** contends that Guo's bankruptcy and criminal proceedings cross-reference allegations from indictments without requiring substantiating evidence.

him*** asks whether the Alliance Farms operate as Guo's alter ego.

joh*** contends that money directed to the farms ultimately went to farm leaders rather than the Guo family or personal consumption.

him*** asks whether Lady May was purchased with Guo's funds.

beg*** contends that legal standards require an itemized, auditable list of specific loss amounts for every victim.

him*** notes that the defense has repeatedly stressed that clients represented by Gail and Gavenman are not victims.

him*** considers a scenario where there are only 50 registered victims.

him*** asks for document 1111 to be posted so it can be shared in the legal documents channel.

kir*** contends that the interview transcript for document 1111 is located in ECF 1195, disputing claims regarding Wu Zheng while noting references to UBS.

ntp*** asks what specific evidence Luc submitted.

reb*** sarcastically argues that Judge Torres should impose a 175-year sentence to take the alleged absurdity to an extreme.

reb*** describes how earlier expectations of 175 years were later replaced with demands for at least 30 years.

joh*** contends that Gail's assembly of 6,000 claimants served to manufacture victim evidence for the criminal trial and route funds to the bankruptcy court without opposing remission.

kir*** contends that certain conduct violates judicial integrity.

him*** expresses approval of the stated approach.

joh*** argues that forfeiture scopes derive from the Wang case and that prosecutors will channel 853(n) and CRVA claims through remission rather than restitution.

him*** shares chat group rules restricting off-topic commentary and prohibiting unsubstantiated accusations or derogatory labeling of other participants.

rui*** posts an external social media link to the discussion.

xin*** recounts wishing only to draft a private complaint and questions why other members treat them as an enemy.