Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 105

roy*** asks whether filing 838 was originally docketed in the Second Circuit.

kir*** contends that the filing exists even if participants have not yet located it.

ntp*** recounts sending filings directly to the Southern District and questions whether the applicant also asked the Southern District to upload the motion.

him*** asserts that the attachments consist of investment evidence.

ntp*** questions whether this type of motion can be docketed in the Second Circuit.

him*** explains that the core contention remains that motion 853n was not entered into the record.

him*** observes that the framing of the case appears to be shifting.

him*** argues that the narrative is transitioning from fraud solely by Guo to fraud by the Alliance.

ntp*** suggests that this shift effectively targets the Alliance.

ntp*** inquires about what will transpire over the next two months and whether a special master will be appointed.

ntp*** contends that court delays are being utilized to prolong the period of detention.

him*** asserts that the case has already concluded.

him*** advises consulting a reliable attorney while recommending against hiring Chinese lawyers.

ntp*** states that hiring an attorney is financially unaffordable.

him*** suggests proceeding pro se as an alternative option.

kir*** mentions docketing the case.

beg*** recounts calling the Second Circuit about unreturned materials and advises others to check whether the court holds their documents.

kir*** contends that a transition to a third wave is underway.

kir*** criticizes people for blindly echoing unverified rumors.

nev*** disputes claims made by an online commentator asserting that Guo was dressed up preparing for an immediate courtroom release.

him*** describes listening briefly to broadcasts where commentators attribute every single action to Guo.

joh*** argues that being convinced to seek money solely through the bankruptcy case rather than as a criminal victim is useless.

joh*** suggests that bankruptcy creditors and exchange clients send emails to challenge Luc by separating bankruptcy and criminal proceedings.

reb*** contends that Judge Manning would dismiss equitable claims to preserve judicial resources and that after sentencing victims are relegated to asserting claims as general creditors under Luc's narrative that G Enterprise belongs to the debtor.

spr*** asks if other participants shared the identical payee.

kir*** questions how received RMB funds were converted into US dollars through intermediary companies.

ntp*** argues that there is no need to consider currency scalpers or intermediaries.

kir*** asserts that while the court controls the prosecution and defense, it cannot control third parties.

kir*** raises questions regarding the integrity of the trustee.

kir*** contends that alleged misconduct has gone uncorrected for three years.

kir*** suggests pursuing a path post-sentencing through Ryan's Rule 60(d) motion for anyone holding assets in the criminal case.

kir*** adds that claimants could utilize agreements executed between Luc and the prosecution.

reb*** criticizes attempts to forfeit GTV and claw back refunds issued prior to the indictment to treat recipients as general creditors.

kir*** contends that document 716-4 dismantled the FBI expert witness's model of fund inflows and outflows.

kir*** argues that the prosecution should not have permitted the FBI witness to mislead the jury.

kir*** contends that RICO allegations were improperly shaped by witness testimonies.