Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 105

roy*** asked whether case 838 had already been filed in second review. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** replied that they had not found confirmation. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** said their materials were sent to the Southern District and asked whether he was also required to upload the motion there. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** said the attachments represented his investment evidence. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** questioned whether a motion of that type could be filed in second review. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** argued that 853n had not been placed in the record. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** noted that the case seemed to be turning. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** suggested reframing from "Guo fraud" to "alliance fraud." Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** said the turn was also seen as a move against the alliance. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** asked what the proceeding would do over the next two months and whether the Master would be released. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** claimed the current extensions were being used to increase attachment time. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** asserted that the case was finished. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** advised finding a reliable lawyer and avoiding Chinese-language counsel. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** said counsel was still needed but unaffordable. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** then suggested proceeding pro se as an alternative. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** referred to a filing step in the ongoing process. Community statements, not court findings.

beg*** said he contacted second review about materials not being returned and pointed to possible identity-related privacy constraints, then urged calling second review for records. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** stated that a third-wave shift was coming. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** dismissed some posts as repeating hearsay. Community statements, not court findings.

nev*** reported claims that someone publicly flaunted Guo being neatly prepared for courtroom release. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** said discussions repeatedly ended up attributing everything to Guo. Community statements, not court findings.

joh*** warned people not to rely on criminal-case victim status and said bankruptcy-only claims may be ineffective. Community statements, not court findings.

joh*** contrasted 1,800 bankruptcy creditors with 6,000 exchange customers, advised separating bankruptcy from criminal matters, and urged communication from awakened participants. Community statements, not court findings.

reb*** contended that if only equitable-interest actors intervene, the court may defer on resource grounds, leaving entities like gclub beneficiaries, and that once sentenced victims may be treated as ordinary creditors under the luc narrative. Community statements, not court findings.

spr*** asked whether another person was a collector in the same role as the speaker. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** asked who she used to convert RMB into USD after receiving it. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** argued it was unnecessary to assume a scalper arrangement. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said courts can control prosecutors and defense but not third parties. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** invoked trustee good faith or integrity concerns. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** argued that corrective action had not been taken for three years. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** described a path where after sentencing, Ryan Rule60d begins and any party with criminal-case assets could act. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** added that parties could rely on luc and the prosecution agreement. Community statements, not court findings.

reb*** questioned whether refunds made before filing, including potential GTV-related seizures, should be reclaimed as debtor funds and then treated as ordinary-creditor claims. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** said the FBI expert cash-in/cash-out model was disrupted by 716-4. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** questioned how the prosecution could allow an FBI witness to mislead the jury. Community statements, not court findings.

kir*** attributed the Rico issue to problematic witness testimony. Community statements, not court findings.