Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 144

kir*** asks another participant if their account was the one associated with Luosi from the start.

him*** contends that the situation mirrors the Alliance's tactic of alleged kidnapping.

kir*** questions whether claims by An Xiaodong alleging a kidnapping actually took place.

roy*** shares a link to an external social media post on X.

ntp*** claims that among the renewed mandates, only those concerning Luosi and Tony were rejected.

ntp*** states that their two stay requests were denied long ago and advises reviewing PACER.

kir*** reports that the mandate has been issued and suggests preparing a motion to recall the mandate like Ryan.

beg*** contends that according to Ryan, the subsequent action requires filing a motion to recall the mandate.

beg*** argues that the case referenced in document 868 requires careful timing when submitting a motion to recall the mandate.

beg*** asks whether returning to the Second Circuit remains viable if filings are not docketed in the Southern District.

beg*** questions whether the Second Circuit granted the Southern District additional time to rectify errors.

beg*** queries whether the rejection of the mandate implies that subsequent motions to vacate are also denied.

sar*** contends that opposing factions distort facts and suggests a male voice in an audio recording may be AI-generated.

may*** notes that the individual admitted to entering the United States via irregular border crossing.

hel*** argues that surreptitious recordings are legally inadmissible as courtroom evidence without prior mutual consent.

kir*** inquires whether a participant formerly assisted the Mayflower group in suppressing criticism of the Alliance.

kir*** notes the group membership of another participant.

joh*** alleges that Anthon removed dissenting members to consolidate control over the private prosecutor group.

may*** asserts bluntly to the group that their money is gone.

kir*** recounts coming to terms with having been defrauded.

hel*** recounts previously being a zealous follower and expresses regret over falling victim to deception.

joh*** alleges that Luc manipulated property documentation across criminal and bankruptcy courts to obtain disposal rights over Mahwah.

hel*** questions whether Luc will obtain priority over seized assets to the detriment of investor recovery.

chu*** argues that formal government forfeiture is an essential legal condition for investors to recover their funds.

him*** contends that while third-party private filings cannot overturn a verdict, they serve to protect personal legal rights.

him*** argues that pursuing private claims creates a record and presents evidence to safeguard individual rights.

kir*** agrees that these dual objectives do not necessarily conflict from a certain perspective.

ntp*** argues that without widespread public attention, insufficient pressure can be exerted on the judicial system.

kir*** remarks that other components also play a role.

sar*** expresses deep hostility toward the Chinese Communist Party and emphasizes anti-regime motivations.

beg*** shares reports from the War Room alleging upcoming decisive actions by newly appointed White House counsel.

ntp*** disputes that the White House counsel is concerned with Guo's case, arguing the focus is solely on Trump.