发言原文
“preponderance of evidence" unless constitutionally mandated, while generally requiring a concrete injury for standing (Lujan) and applying "probable cause" for warrants
beg*** 发言
发言时间：2025-12-14 00:47:53围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。
围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。
“preponderance of evidence" unless constitutionally mandated, while generally requiring a concrete injury for standing (Lujan) and applying "probable cause" for warrants