reb*** 发言

The Government has continued to rely on disputed creditor claims that multiple third parties have identified as fictitious, while declining to clarify, disclose, or test those claims through any adversarial proceeding. This posture raises serious due process concerns under Brady and its progeny, and independently requires a §853(n) hearing to determine ownership and the legitimacy of asserted claims before forfeiture or dissipation continues. 政府持续依赖已被多个第三方认定为虚构的、存在争议的债权人索赔，却拒绝通过任何对抗性程序澄清、披露或检验这些索赔。 这种做法引发了《布雷迪规则》及其后续判例所规定的严重正当程序问题，并且本身就要求在继续没收或挥霍之前，举行《1988年破产法》第853(n)条规定的听证会，以确定所有权和所主张索赔的合法性。