发言原文
这些除了程序性错误,其它都很难打吧,属于有争议的,就好像庭审律师一样,中规中矩,结果没用
围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点,不等同于法院认定。
4. Insufficiency of the Evidence (Rule 29 Challenge) The Legal Argument: The defense will move under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, asserting that "no reasonable jury could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt" based on the record presented at trial. How...
这些除了程序性错误,其它都很难打吧,属于有争议的,就好像庭审律师一样,中规中矩,结果没用