MUBEITECH

ton*** 发言

发言时间:2026-08-08 21:54:57

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点,不等同于法院认定。

MarkdownJSON在批次中查看位置TGFB
发言原文
四段决定性原文 ECF 186(他的第一份) — §3771 是转述政府,不是自己主张 "In the GOVERNMENT'S MOTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3771 filed in March 2023, the United States characterizes the petitioners as 'victims' of the Defendants." ECF 247(托雷斯裁定,2024-03-07) — 通道在这里就被钉死了 起诉后的 Rule 41(g) "clearly barred by [21 U.S.C.] § 853(k)";唯一例外是 §853(n),而该附带程序 "may commence only after the sentence is entered by an order of forfeiture and notice is given to the public." 引 De Almeida, 459 F.3d at 381(§853(n) 是 "the only avenue")、Watts、DSI Assocs., 496 F.3d at 183 ECF 478(转折点) — 请求依据清单 + 第 I 节标题 "…as authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A)(i) … 21 U.S.C. §§ 853(i) and (n), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, Rule 41(g)…" 第 I 节 "STATUS AS VICTIM" | 第 III 节 "CONFLICT BETWEEN § 983 AND CVRA" ECF 612(最被忽略的一句) — 他自己写的 1,433 份合并宣誓书 "designed to cover the ancillary petition and the remission process. The challenge is that no client has yet communicated to undersigned counsel that the Defendants victimized them." 标题:Motion for … Return of Himalaya Exchange Depositors Victimized by the U.S. Government