发言原文
辩方在 Dkt. 383 中没有充分利用已经出现的退款和独立行为证据，导致 Dkt. 388 对共谋者陈述作出有利于政府的裁定。 现在如果再有证据证明夏和 Sara 实际上存在独立的资金控制、转移和利益分配关系，那么律师本来可能需要提出一个更有针对性的论证： The Government’s characterization of the Phoenix Farm leaders as participants acting within a single conspiracy failed to distinguish their alleged independent control, diversion, and disposition of investor funds from conduct undertaken at the direction of the charged enterprise. The Court therefore needed to examine the specific relationship between each declarant, the charged conspiracy, and each statement offered under Rule 801(d)(2)(E). 这不是说夏和 Sara 无罪，而是要求政府证明他们与郭的共谋之间究竟是什么关系。