Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 009

ntp*** asks when Guo originally broadcast his livestream advising followers to register as creditors.

him*** recalls that the remarks occurred during a broadcast with multiple participants, possibly the New Year livestream.

ntp*** concludes that the discussion took place during the 2023 New Year broadcast.

ntp*** shares a social media link concerning ongoing bankruptcy case matters.

rui*** contends that Guo's legal defense team is likely exerting strategic pressure.

him*** argues that early filings and farm-organized registrations were fraudulent, contending that Luc must scrutinize all applicants if reviews begin.

ntp*** asks whether new filings were submitted to the court on Jun 13, 2025.

ntp*** contends that community members cannot expect Guo to secure release without external effort.

ntp*** notes that Guo has remained completely cut off from the outside world for two years.

ntp*** asks chu*** to share a link to their analysis connecting Guo to the bankruptcy court.

chu*** describes conveying those viewpoints through disorganized voice messages rather than formal posts, offering to look back at September records.

chu*** recounts posting on X on Sep 27 of the prior year, noting their Gettr account was subsequently removed.

him*** contends that prosecutors ultimately chose not to pursue the obstruction of justice charge against Guo.

him*** points out that the obstruction determination was merely a judicial ruling rendered during Guo's bail proceedings.

him*** notes that chunk previously provided an analysis of why the prosecution abandoned that charge.

him*** argues that sentencing cannot proceed without establishing confirmed victim numbers and predicts judicial delays.

ntp*** alerts sar*** that Xiao Yang is targeting them in online commentary.

sar*** jokingly dismisses Xiao Yang's comments, remarking that being mentioned is an honor.

sar*** describes briefly entering Xiao Yang's chat group, criticizing its management and alleging rampant dishonesty.

ntp*** suspects that Xiao Yang deliberately blocked their invitation to prevent them from entering the group.

rui*** contends that Xiao Yang's group is attempting to eliminate core movement rhetoric.

chu*** quotes from their filing in document 679, asking the court to invalidate creditor registries and urging prosecutors to investigate Luc Geyer and alliance leadership under docket 671.

rui*** responds that the filing delivers a sharp psychological blow.

chu*** recounts attacking counsel representing digital bank claimants without knowing their identity.

him*** asks whether a separate legal case can be filed against those responsible for leaking personal information.

him*** contends that participants registered on the exchange can expose Geyer over victim representation issues.

him*** describes the unauthorized disclosure of personal information concerning an American citizen as a grave issue.

sar*** asks rui*** whether they will place a call to Guo's defense attorney earlier in the day.

rui*** recounts leaving a message the day before and expects counsel to return the call.

him*** doubts that the attorneys will take the initiative to return the phone call.

xin*** shares an online post regarding community debates.

ntp*** criticizes participants for displaying unprincipled, blind allegiance to movement figures.

ntp*** argues that shifting factions surround Guo whenever he surfaces, contending Chinese authorities had already encircled him from multiple angles.

him*** asks whether anyone obtained a case docket number regarding litigation against Luc by a peer's husband.

him*** informs rui*** that Doudou provided a response.

him*** inquires whether Doudou indicated that her husband had formally withdrawn his creditor registration.