Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 010

A participant says at least two lawyers would not respond to them, framing counsel as unreliable in practice. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant predicts another commentator will publicly accuse them of perjury if they continue pushing their position. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says a judge indicated only CVRA and 853(n) are available routes for third-party motions here. Community statements, not court findings.

The same participant advises checking those two statutes directly for third-party rights and protections before drafting filings. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant posts an X link presented as evidence on the issue of creditor-list challenges. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant posts a second X link linked to the same contested registration and motion context. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says most bankruptcy-linked issues can be undone, but conviction depends on the amount of independent evidence. Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant concurs that bankruptcy-related material may be struck, while reserving judgment on other evidence. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant questions why registering as creditors seems directed by Guo rather than by participants’ own choice. Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant speculates the backlash reflects perceived betrayal and emotional response from Guo. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says counsel is not paid by Guo but by government funds because of bankruptcy, and notes a livestream correction on this point. Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant questions whether public funding has limits and whether it could cover defendant-level multi-million-dollar legal bills. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant states the priority is to attack Luc’s creditor entry and says third-party intervention seems the only channel, largely limited to money-related claims, then asks what action can target Luc. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant points to a prior third-party motion, likely number 524, related to prosecutorial criminal investigation concerning Luc. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant critiques a livestreamer as antagonistic in a major case, including personal attacks on another member over status and intent. Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant calls the livestreamer and their followers theatrically pseudo-spiritual and dismissive. Community statements, not court findings.